Literature DB >> 9223649

Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL.

S Perrett1, R Zahn, G Stenberg, A R Fersht.   

Abstract

The question of how chaperones rapidly bind non-native proteins of very different sequence and function has been examined by determining the effect of ionic strength on the refolding of barnase on GroEL, and on the thermal denaturation of barnase in the presence of GroEL and SecB. Both chaperones bind the denatured state of barnase, so lowering the T(m) value. The refolding of barnase in the presence of GroEL is multiphasic, the slowest phase corresponding to the refolding of a singly bound molecule of barnase in the complex with GroEL. The fastest phase is related to the association of barnase and GroEL. At high ratios of GroEL to barnase and low ionic strength (less than 200 mM) this fast phase corresponds to the observed rate of binding. The rate of association of barnase and GroEL was found to be highly dependent on ionic strength, and at high ionic strength (greater than 600 mM) the majority of barnase molecules escaped binding and refolded free in solution. The data are consistent with an initial, transient, ionic interaction between barnase and GroEL, before hydrophobic binding occurs, allowing diffusion-controlled association and slow dissociation of unfolded polypeptide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9223649     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  GroEL/S substrate specificity based on substrate unfolding propensity.

Authors:  Kristin N Parent; Carolyn M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Atomic force microscopy detects changes in the interaction forces between GroEL and substrate proteins.

Authors:  A Vinckier; P Gervasoni; F Zaugg; U Ziegler; P Lindner; P Groscurth; A Plückthun; G Semenza
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Chaperone-client interactions: Non-specificity engenders multifunctionality.

Authors:  Philipp Koldewey; Scott Horowitz; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Increased surface charge in the protein chaperone Spy enhances its anti-aggregation activity.

Authors:  Wei He; Jiayin Zhang; Veronika Sachsenhauser; Lili Wang; James C A Bardwell; Shu Quan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Allosteric inhibition of the NS2B-NS3 protease from dengue virus.

Authors:  Muslum Yildiz; Sumana Ghosh; Jeffrey A Bell; Woody Sherman; Jeanne A Hardy
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 8.  Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics.

Authors:  G Schreiber; G Haran; H-X Zhou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 9.  GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?

Authors:  Victor V Marchenkov; Gennady V Semisotnov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Forces Driving Chaperone Action.

Authors:  Philipp Koldewey; Frederick Stull; Scott Horowitz; Raoul Martin; James C A Bardwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.