Literature DB >> 9222576

Measuring the effectiveness of a pilot continuing medical education program.

J A Moran1, P Kirk, M Kopelow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a learner-centred, small group CME program intended to improve the clinical performance of family physicians identified as having serious practice deficiencies by the University of Manitoba's Clinical Assessment and Enhancement Program.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized control trial in which data were collected from patients' charts and physician performance was evaluated. Differences in subjects' scores were tested at program entry and at 6 months and 18 months later using a two-way analysis of variance.
SETTING: Family medicine practices in Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen family physicians: five study subjects and 10 control subjects. The five study subjects were identified as needing CME to improve their clinical performance. The 10 control subjects were randomly selected.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants attended a 10-session, learner-centred, small group CME program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical care, preventive care, charting, and the use of drugs were the variables assessed.
RESULTS: Study subjects' initial scores were much lower than those of controls, but improved significantly during the CME program.
CONCLUSION: A learner-centred, small group CME program can improve clinical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9222576      PMCID: PMC2146281     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  6 in total

1.  Models for continuing professional education.

Authors:  D J Belsheim
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-12

Review 2.  The past, present, and future of continuing medical education. Achievements and opportunities, computers and recertification.

Authors:  P R Manning; D W Petit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The effectiveness of continuing medical education: eight research reports.

Authors:  L S Stein
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1981-02

4.  A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education.

Authors:  R B Haynes; D A Davis; A McKibbon; P Tugwell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Continuing medical education: the case for contamination.

Authors:  S E Goldfinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The effects of continuing medical education on family doctor performance in office practice: a randomized control study.

Authors:  P A Jennett; O E Laxdal; R C Hayton; D J Klaassen; R W Swanson; T W Wilson; H J Spooner; G W Mainprize; R E Wickett
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.251

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The objective assessment of general practitioners' educational needs: an under-researched area?

Authors:  P Myers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings.

Authors:  U Freudenstein; A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference?

Authors:  P Cantillon; R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

4.  Problem based learning in continuing medical education: a review of controlled evaluation studies.

Authors:  P B A Smits; J H A M Verbeek; C D de Buisonjé
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.