Literature DB >> 9222193

Intrathecal administration of recombinant human superoxide dismutase 1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a preliminary safety and pharmacokinetic study.

M E Cudkowicz1, L Warren, J W Francis, K J Lloyd, R M Friedlander, L F Borges, N Kassem, T L Munsat, R H Brown.   

Abstract

We undertook a safety and pharmacokinetic study of intrathecal (i.t.) recombinant human superoxide dismutase (rhSOD1). We administered rhSOD1 as an acute bolus in three sheep and 16 human subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Two sheep received chronic i.t. infusion of rhSOD1 (one at 17.7 mg per day, the second at 38.0 mg per day) for six months. Two of the 16 subjects had familial ALS and mutations in the gene for Cu/Zn SOD1. They both received i.t. infusion of rhSOD1 (5 to 10 mg per day) for 3 to 6 months. Intrathecal rhSOD1 administration was safe. Bolus i.t. administration of 0.25 mg rhSOD1 in sheep revealed a mean elimination half-life of 0.4 (SD +/- 0.06) hours, clearance of 12.2 +/- 3.2 ml per hour, and volume of distribution of 7.3 +/- 0.9 ml. After chronic i.t. infusion, the initial alpha-phase half-life was estimated as 1.2 hours and the extended beta-phase half-life was 15.0 hours. The mean clearance rate was 25.9 ml per hour and the steady-state volume of distribution was 920.6 ml. Bolus i.t. administration of 20 micrograms of rhSOD1 in ALS subjects revealed a mean elimination half-life of 2.2 +/- 0.8 hours, clearance of 1.2 +/- 0.6 ml per hour, and volume of distribution of 3.5 +/- 0.4 ml. With chronic i.t. infusion of 5 mg per day, cerebrospinal SOD1 levels increased approximately fortyfold. We detected no benefit of this treatment in the two patients with familial ALS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9222193     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.49.1.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  8 in total

Review 1.  RNA-targeted Therapeutics for ALS.

Authors:  Linga V Reddy; Timothy M Miller
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: new genetic analysis methodologies entailing new opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marangi; Bryan J Traynor
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Impaired extracellular secretion of mutant superoxide dismutase 1 associates with neurotoxicity in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Bradley J Turner; Julie D Atkin; Manal A Farg; Da Wei Zang; Alan Rembach; Elizabeth C Lopes; Justin D Patch; Andrew F Hill; Surindar S Cheema
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  New considerations in the design of clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  James D Berry; Merit E Cudkowicz
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of antioxidants and their impact on systemic oxidative stress.

Authors:  Edzard Schwedhelm; Renke Maas; Raphael Troost; Rainer H Böger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: progress and prospects for treatment.

Authors:  Michel Dib
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Distinctive features of the D101N and D101G variants of superoxide dismutase 1; two mutations that produce rapidly progressing motor neuron disease.

Authors:  Jacob Ayers; Herman Lelie; Aron Workman; Mercedes Prudencio; Hilda Brown; Susan Fromholt; Joan Valentine; Julian Whitelegge; David Borchelt
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.372

8.  Plasma methionine sulfoxide in persons with familial Alzheimer's disease mutations.

Authors:  John M Ringman; Andrew T Fithian; Karen Gylys; Jeffrey L Cummings; Giovanni Coppola; David Elashoff; Domenico Pratico; Jackob Moskovitz; Gal Bitan
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.959

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.