Literature DB >> 9220333

Compensation for subjects of medical research: the moral rights of patients and the power of research ethics committees.

S Guest1.   

Abstract

Awareness of the morally significant distinction between research and innovative therapy reveals serious gaps in the legal provision for compensation in the UK for injured subjects of medical research. Major problems are limitations inherent in negligence actions and a culture that emphasises indemnifying researchers before compensating victims. Medical research morally requires compensation on a no-fault basis even where there is proper consent on the part of the research subject. In particular, for drug research, there is insufficient provision in the current patient guidelines of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, since they make "no legal commitment" to paying compensation for injury to patient subjects. There is a need for the provision of both adequate insurance and contractual arrangements for making payments. The solution is for Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) to make use of their power to withhold approval of medical research where compensation is not legally enforceable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9220333      PMCID: PMC1377348          DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.3.181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Scrutinising research ethics committees.

Authors:  Tim Marshall; Peter Moodie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-24
  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Compensation for the subjects of medical research.

Authors:  S Guest
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Compensating subjects of medical research.

Authors:  T Hope
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Ethics in exercise science research.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees.

Authors:  Rebecca H Li; Mary C Wacholtz; Mark Barnes; Liam Boggs; Susan Callery-D'Amico; Amy Davis; Alla Digilova; David Forster; Kate Heffernan; Maeve Luthin; Holly Fernandez Lynch; Lindsay McNair; Jennifer E Miller; Jacquelyn Murphy; Luann Van Campen; Mark Wilenzick; Delia Wolf; Cris Woolston; Carmen Aldinger; Barbara E Bierer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Disparate compensation policies for research related injury in an era of multinational trials: a case study of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

Authors:  George Rugare Chingarande; Keymanthri Moodley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.