Literature DB >> 9220325

Requests for "inappropriate" treatment based on religious beliefs.

R D Orr1, L B Genesen.   

Abstract

Requests by patients or their families for treatment which the patient's physician considers to be "inappropriate" are becoming more frequent than refusals of treatment which the physician considers appropriate. Such requests are often based on the patient's religious beliefs about the attributes of God (sovereignty, omnipotence), the attributes of persons (sanctity of life), or the individual's personal relationship with God (communication, commands, etc). We present four such cases and discuss some of the basic religious tenets of the three Abrahamic faith traditions as they relate to such requests. We suggest that religious reasons for requesting "inappropriate" treatment are "special" and deserve serious consideration. We offer guidance to assist clinicians and clinical ethicists as they attempt to resolve these conflicts, emphasising the importance of understanding the religious beliefs of the patient/surrogate and suggesting the assistance of a religious interpreter. We suggest open discussion with patients and families of both the clinical situation and the theological basis for these requests. We also suggest that clinicians use additional religious doctrines or principles from patients' own traditions to balance the reasons behind the requests. We conclude that most persistent requests for "inappropriate" treatment should be honoured.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Religious Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9220325      PMCID: PMC1377339          DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.3.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  12 in total

Review 1.  Theology and bioethics.

Authors:  R A McCormick
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Informed demand for "non-beneficial" medical treatment.

Authors:  S H Miles
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Physicians' refusal of requested treatment. The case of Baby L.

Authors:  J J Paris; R K Crone; F Reardon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Must we always use CPR?

Authors:  L J Blackhall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The desperate case: CARE (costs, applicability, research, ethics)

Authors:  F D Moore
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care--the case of Baby K.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Beyond autonomy--physicians' refusal to use life-prolonging extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  J J Paris; M D Schreiber; M Statter; R Arensman; M Siegler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; N S Jecker; A R Jonsen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative.

Authors:  R S Olick
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1991-12

10.  Autonomy, religious values, and refusal of lifesaving medical treatment.

Authors:  M J Wreen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  10 in total

1.  Assessing the ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context.

Authors:  J F Buryska
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Transfusion contracts for Jehovah's Witnesses receiving organ transplants: ethical necessity or coercive pact?

Authors:  K A Bramstedt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-06

4.  Two worlds apart: religion and ethics.

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Medicine, ethics and religion: rational or irrational?

Authors:  R D Orr; L B Genesen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  The paediatrician and the rabbi.

Authors:  A Shuper; A Zeharia; J Balter-Seri; D Steier; M Mimouni
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Islamic perspectives on clinical intervention near the end-of-life: We can but must we?

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Omar Qureshi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

8.  Patient-centered care and cultural practices: process and criteria for evaluating adaptations of norms and standards in health care institutions.

Authors:  Matthew R Hunt
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2009-12

9.  Slowing Down Time: An Exploration of Personal Life Extension Desirability as it Relates to Religiosity and Specific Religious Beliefs.

Authors:  Scott Ballinger; Theresa Clement Tisdale; David L Sellen; Loren A Martin
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2017-02

10.  Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units.

Authors:  Matthew H Anstey; John L Adams; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.