| Literature DB >> 9220324 |
R Hoedemaekers1, H ten Have, R Chadwick.
Abstract
Three recent reports on genetic screening published in the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands are discussed. Comparison of the Dutch report with the Danish and the Nuffield reports reveals that the Dutch report focuses on the aim of enlarging the scope for action, emphasising protection of autonomy and self-determination of the screenee more than the other two reports. The three reports have in common that the main concern is with concrete issue such as stigmatisation, discrimination, protection of the private sphere and issues linked with labour and insurance. Some potential long term consequences, however, tend to be neglected or underestimated. These omissions are pointed out.Keywords: Analytical Approach; Ethics and Mapping of the Human Genome (Danish Council of Ethics); Genetic Screening: Ethical Issues (Nuffield Council on Bioethics); Genetics and Reproduction; Genetische Screening (Dutch Health Council)
Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9220324 PMCID: PMC1377338 DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.3.135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903