Literature DB >> 9219465

Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants born at term: growth and development during the first year of life.

T Markestad1, T Vik, G Ahlsten, M Gebre-Medhin, R Skjaerven, G Jacobsen, H J Hoffman, L S Bakketeig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare growth patterns and psychomotor development of healthy small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and non-SGA infants, and identify factors predictive of outcome at 13 months of age.
METHOD: A total of 265 SGA infants and 329 non-SGA controls were identified from a multicenter cohort of 5722 para 1 and 2 women who had been followed during pregnancy. The infants were examined at 2 days and at 13 months of age. Psychomotor development at 13 months was assessed with The Bayley Scale of Infant Development.
RESULTS: The SGA infants showed partial catch-up growth, but had still lower (mean +/- SEM, p < 0.0001) weight (9750 +/- 65 vs 10505 +/- 67 g), crown-heel length (75.9 +/- 0.2 vs 77.5 +/- 0.2 cm) and head circumference (46.9 +/- 0.1 vs 47.7 +/- 0.1 cm) than the non-SGA infants at 13 months. The SGA children scored equally well on the motor (PDI 106.8 +/- 1.0 vs 107.2 +/- 0.8) but lower on the mental scale (MDI 112.1 +/- 0.8 vs 116.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001) of the Bayley Scale, and the asymmetric SGA scored lower than the symmetric SGA infants (MDI 110.2 +/- 1.3 vs 113.3 +/- 0.9, p = 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis the parents' growth parameters had the greatest effect on growth measures at 13 months while education and maternal smoking had no significant effect. SGA vs non-SGA status had the greatest effect on growth velocities during infancy. For mental development only SGA vs non-SGA status and the mothers' education made significant contributions, but only accounted for 6% of the variance.
CONCLUSION: The negative impact of intrauterine factors on growth are partly abolished by catch-up growth during infancy, and growth parameters at one year of age are mostly determined by genetic factors even in SGA infants. Decreased intrauterine growth may possibly have a negative effect on brain growth and mental developmental potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8835


  5 in total

1.  Cognitive development of term small for gestational age children at five years of age.

Authors:  K Sommerfelt; H W Andersson; K Sonnander; G Ahlsten; B Ellertsen; T Markestad; G Jacobsen; H J Hoffman; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Insulin sensitivity in children born small for gestational age (SGA).

Authors:  Caterina Geremia; Stefano Cianfarani
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2004-08-10

3.  Maternal nutritional status predicts adverse birth outcomes among HIV-infected rural Ugandan women receiving combination antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Sera Young; Katherine Murray; Julia Mwesigwa; Paul Natureeba; Beth Osterbauer; Jane Achan; Emmanuel Arinaitwe; Tamara Clark; Veronica Ades; Albert Plenty; Edwin Charlebois; Theodore Ruel; Moses Kamya; Diane Havlir; Deborah Cohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Maternal exposure to bisphenol-A and fetal growth restriction: a case-referent study.

Authors:  Igor Burstyn; Jonathan W Martin; Sanjay Beesoon; Fiona Bamforth; Qiaozhi Li; Yutaka Yasui; Nicola M Cherry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The frequency of pulmonary hypertension in newborn with intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  Ghulam Abbas; Shahid Shah; Muhammad Hanif; Abid Shah; Anees Ur Rehman; Sana Tahir; Komal Nayab; Arzoo Asghar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.