L Robinson1, J Potterton, P Owen. 1. Department of Primary Health Care, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A training programme has been proposed for general practitioners (GPs) to perform ultrasound in primary care. This has generated considerable concern among radiologists as to the adequacy and appropriateness of such training. AIM: To assess the current provision of ultrasound services to primary care in the former Northern health region of England, the level of interest among GPs in undertaking recommended training, and the willingness or ability of radiology departments to provide it. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were sent to GPs (n = 334), their practice managers (n = 281) and all clinical directors/heads of radiology departments (n = 19) in the region. RESULTS: Altogether, 67% of GPs, 59% of practice managers, and 68% of radiologists returned questionnaires. Overall, 48% of GPs have open access to obstetric/gynaecological ultrasound compared with 77% for general diagnostic requests. A total of 73% of GPs would prefer an open access service and 15% a practice-based service. Some 48% of GPs were not interested, 36% moderately interested, and 16% very interested in participating in the training programme. Only two out of 13 radiology, departments were willing to provide such training. CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations from the Royal College of General Practitioners, around half the respondents in this survey do not have direct access to ultrasound for obstetric referrals, and a quarter for non-obstetric referrals. Interest shown by GPs in a primary care-led service is not mirrored by their radiology colleagues. Open access to ultrasound was considered the optimum service, suggesting that resources be targeted at improving hospital services rather than transferring facilities to primary care.
BACKGROUND: A training programme has been proposed for general practitioners (GPs) to perform ultrasound in primary care. This has generated considerable concern among radiologists as to the adequacy and appropriateness of such training. AIM: To assess the current provision of ultrasound services to primary care in the former Northern health region of England, the level of interest among GPs in undertaking recommended training, and the willingness or ability of radiology departments to provide it. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were sent to GPs (n = 334), their practice managers (n = 281) and all clinical directors/heads of radiology departments (n = 19) in the region. RESULTS: Altogether, 67% of GPs, 59% of practice managers, and 68% of radiologists returned questionnaires. Overall, 48% of GPs have open access to obstetric/gynaecological ultrasound compared with 77% for general diagnostic requests. A total of 73% of GPs would prefer an open access service and 15% a practice-based service. Some 48% of GPs were not interested, 36% moderately interested, and 16% very interested in participating in the training programme. Only two out of 13 radiology, departments were willing to provide such training. CONCLUSION: Despite recommendations from the Royal College of General Practitioners, around half the respondents in this survey do not have direct access to ultrasound for obstetric referrals, and a quarter for non-obstetric referrals. Interest shown by GPs in a primary care-led service is not mirrored by their radiology colleagues. Open access to ultrasound was considered the optimum service, suggesting that resources be targeted at improving hospital services rather than transferring facilities to primary care.
Authors: G I Hackett; M F Hudson; J B Wylie; A D Jackson; K M Small; P Harrison; J O'Brien; P Harrison Journal: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) Date: 1987-01-03