Literature DB >> 9219193

Preference values for visual states in patients planning to undergo cataract surgery.

E B Bass1, S Wills, I U Scott, J C Javitt, J M Tielsch, O D Schein, E P Steinberg.   

Abstract

To assess how preference values that cataract surgery patients assign to their preoperative visual states relate to visual acuity and problems in specific aspects of daily life, the authors interviewed 47 patients scheduled to have cataract surgery. Using a rating-scale technique with a scale from 0 (death) to 1 (excellent health), the patients had a mean preference value of 0.68 for their preoperative vision. Patients' preference values for their preoperative vision were more closely related to problems in specific aspects of daily life (especially feelings of depression and problems interacting with people) than to visual acuity in the operative eye, better eye, or worse eye, or a weighted average of visual acuities in both eyes. These results provide a rationale for relying more on patients' views about the effects of visual impairment than on measures of visual acuity when assessing the need for cataract surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219193     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  9 in total

1.  A utility analysis correlation with visual acuity: methodologies and vision in the better and poorer eyes.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; A F Smith; J Landy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Quality of life and relative importance: a comparison of time trade-off and conjoint analysis methods in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  P A Aspinall; A R Hill; B Dhillon; A M Armbrecht; P Nelson; C Lumsden; E Farini-Hudson; R Brice; A Vickers; P Buchholz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization--The Submacular Surgery Trials Vision Preference Value Scale: SST Report No. 6.

Authors:  Eric B Bass; Marsha J Marsh; Carol M Mangione; Neil M Bressler; Ashley L Childs; Li Ming Dong; Barbara S Hawkins; Harris A Jaffee; Päivi Miskala
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Using healthcare claims data for outcomes research and pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  H G Birnbaum; P Y Cremieux; P E Greenberg; J LeLorier; J A Ostrander; L Venditti
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Glaucoma patients' assessment of their visual function and quality of life.

Authors:  H D Jampel
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

6.  Vision Preference Value Scale and Patient Preferences in Choosing Therapy for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Interface Abnormality.

Authors:  Marguerite O Linz; Neil M Bressler; Voraporn Chaikitmongkol; Sobha Sivaprasad; Direk Patikulsila; Janejit Choovuthayakorn; Nawat Watanachai; Paradee Kunavisarut; Deepthy Menon; Mongkol Tadarati; Kátia Delalíbera Pacheco; Abanti Sanyal; Adrienne W Scott
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of 3 treatment strategies for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.

Authors:  R I Griffiths; G C Bleecker; D A Jabs; D T Dieterich; L Coleson; D Winters; R Wolitz; E P Steinberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and visual function in Japanese glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Hideko Sawada; Takeo Fukuchi; Haruki Abe
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-28

9.  High alert drugs screening using gradient boosting classifier.

Authors:  Pakpoom Wongyikul; Nuttamon Thongyot; Pannika Tantrakoolcharoen; Pusit Seephueng; Piyapong Khumrin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.