Literature DB >> 9219186

Use of influence diagrams to structure medical decisions.

R F Nease1, D K Owens.   

Abstract

Influence diagrams are compact representations of decision problems that are mathematically equivalent to decision trees. The authors present five important principles for structuring a decision as an influence diagram: 1) start at the value node and work back to the decision nodes; 2) draw the arcs in the direction that makes the probabilities easiest to assess; 3) use informational arcs to specify which events will have been observed at the time each decision is made; 4) ensure that missing arcs reflect intentional assertions about conditional independence and the timing of observations; and 5) ensure that there are no cycles in the influence diagram. They then build an influence diagram for the problem of staging non-small-cell lung cancer as an illustration. Influence diagrams offer several strengths for structuring medical decisions. They represent graphically and compactly the probabilistic relationships between parameters in the model. Influence diagrams also allow the model to be structured in a fashion that eases the necessary probability assessments, regardless of whether the assessments are based on available evidence or on expert judgment. Influence diagrams provide an important complement to decision trees, especially for representing probabilistic relationships among variables in a decision model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219186     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  12 in total

Review 1.  Modelling methods for pharmacoeconomics and health technology assessment: an overview and guide.

Authors:  James E Stahl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Use of medical informatics to implement and develop clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D K Owens
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-03

3.  Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--2.

Authors:  Mark Roberts; Louise B Russell; A David Paltiel; Michael Chambers; Phil McEwan; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Apply influence diagrams for utility analysis of paying the weight-reducing expenses: a case study in taiwan.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Pei-Ran Sun; Chi-Chang Chang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Knowledge-based method for building patient decision-analytic tools.

Authors:  Amar K Das; Bilal A Ahmed; Yael Garten; Jeremy I Robin; Mary K Goldstein
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Modeling miRNA-mRNA interactions that cause phenotypic abnormality in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sanghoon Lee; Xia Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Leaky Noisy-OR Bayesian Network Applied to Genetic Counseling in Dogs.

Authors:  Johann C Detilleux
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Decision analytic modeling for the economic analysis of proton radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wade P Smith; Patrick J Richard; Jing Zeng; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Ramesh Rengan; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

9.  A new method for predicting patient survivorship using efficient bayesian network learning.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Diyang Xue; Adam Brufsky; Seema Khan; Richard Neapolitan
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-02-13

10.  Optimal sequence of tests for the mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Manuel Luque; Francisco Javier Díez; Carlos Disdier
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.