Pelvic examination instruction and experience: a comparison of laywoman-trained and physician-trained students.

PURPOSE: To evaluate medical student performances of pelvic examinations after completion of the obstetrics-gynecology (ob-gyn) clinical clerkship in order to compare the effectiveness of training by laywomen serving as both teachers and patients with the effectiveness of training by an attending physician as teacher, with a lay-woman serving only as the patient. The study also examined whether students were given additional training and opportunities for practice during their clinical clerkships in other disciplines.
METHOD: Following completion of their ob-gyn clerk-ships in 1993 and 1994, a total of 81 students at two North Carolina medical schools answered a questionnaire eliciting demographic information, pelvic examination experience, and the content of the training they had received. The students then performed a pelvic examination on a standardized patient (SP). Their performances were evaluated by the SP using a 35-item scale, subdivided into technical and interpersonal skills. The data were analyzed by two-tailed t-tests, analysis of variance, and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: The laywoman-trained students demonstrated better interpersonal skills than did the physician-trained students (p = .01). No significant difference was found in technical skills. Nearly one-fourth of the students reported that communication skills had not been taught during their ob-gyn clerkships. The students reported performing pelvic examinations often on their ob-gyn rotation but infrequently on other rotations.
CONCLUSION: The authors recommend that teaching by laywomen be incorporated into the teaching of pelvic examinations and other aspects of a women's health curriculum. Interpersonal skills taught by laywomen in preclinical courses on pelvic examination may have a lasting effect that can be demonstrated after exposure to clinical clerkships. Clinical clerkships should then reinforce these skills.