Literature DB >> 9217332

How well do ambulatory care groups predict expenditures on mental health and substance abuse patients?

S L Ettner1, E H Notman.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the ability of Ambulatory Care Groups (ACGs) to prospectively predict mental health and substance abuse expenditures and total health care expenditures of persons enrolled in the New Hampshire Medicaid Program during fiscal years 1993 and 1994. A series of multi-part models is estimated separately for adults and children and a synthetic R-squared and the mean absolute predictive error are calculated. The results show that with the exception of predicting total expenditures for children, ACGs do not perform as well as simple models containing various demographic and prior mental health/substance abuse utilization measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9217332     DOI: 10.1007/bf02042518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health        ISSN: 0894-587X


  11 in total

1.  Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.

Authors:  S L Ettner; R G Frank; T G McGuire; R C Hermann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Do adjusted clinical groups eliminate incentives for HMOs to avoid substance abusers? Evidence from the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program.

Authors:  Susan L Ettner; Steven Johnson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Improving risk adjustment of self-reported mental health outcomes.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Sharmila Chatterjee; Mark E Glickman; Avron Spiro; Pradipta Seal; Susan V Eisen
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Using risk adjustment approaches in child welfare performance measurement: Applications and insights from health and mental health settings.

Authors:  Ramesh Raghavan
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2010-01-01

5.  [Comparative study at 4 health centres of efficiency, measured on the basis of ambulatory care groups].

Authors:  Josep Serrat Tarrés; Antoni Sicras Mainar; Josep Ramón Llopart López; Ruth Navarro Artieda; Josep Codes Marco; Josep Antón González Ares
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Risk adjustment of capitation payments to behavioral health care carve-outs: how well do existing methodologies account for psychiatric disability?

Authors:  S L Ettner; R G Frank; T Mark; M W Smith
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-02

7.  Diagnostic cost groups (DCGs) and concurrent utilization among patients with substance abuse disorders.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Susan A Loveland; Jennifer J Anderson; Cheryl S Hankin; James N Breckenridge; Dan R Berlowitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The mental health care context and patient characteristics: implications for provider job satisfaction.

Authors:  C Raymond Bingham; Marcia Valenstein; Frederic C Blow; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Solutions for adverse selection in behavioral health care.

Authors:  R G Frank; T G McGuire; J P Bae; A Rupp
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1997

10.  Predicting Future High-Cost Schizophrenia Patients Using High-Dimensional Administrative Data.

Authors:  Yajuan Wang; Vijay Iyengar; Jianying Hu; David Kho; Erin Falconer; John P Docherty; Gigi Y Yuen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.