Literature DB >> 9217027

An immunohistochemical assessment of cathepsin D in gastric carcinoma: its impact on clinical prognosis.

H Allgayer1, R Babic, K U Grützner, B C Beyer, A Tarabichi, F Wilhelm Schildberg, M M Heiss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the context of tumor-associated proteolysis, the prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast carcinoma has been studied but its role is controversial in relation to gastrointestinal carcinoma. The aim of the current study was to determine whether cathepsin D is a prognostic parameter for gastric carcinoma, and also to consider interaction with the urokinase-plasminogen activator (uPA) system as an established risk factor for tumor-associated proteolysis.
METHODS: In a consecutive prospective series of 203 gastric carcinoma patients, expression of cathepsin D in tumor cells was semiquantitatively analyzed with immunohistochemistry (scored 0-3). Median follow-up time was 31 months (range, 9-56 months). Kaplan-Meier (log rank) and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyze survival.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank statistics) revealed significant association of increasing cathepsin D detection with poorer disease free survival (P = 0.0042) and poorer overall survival (P = 0.0018) of curatively resected patients. Overall survival of all patients was not significantly correlated. Multivariate analysis of established risk factors for gastric carcinoma, including the uPA system, identified cathepsin D as a new and independent prognostic parameter for disease free survival (P = 0.020; relative risk, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-6.91). Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 as a representative of the uPA system was confirmed as a strong independent factor for disease free and overall survival. Chi-square analysis showed significant correlation of higher cathepsin D levels with Laurén's diffuse-type carcinomas and strong evidence of uPA receptor in tumor cells. However, a subgroup analysis performed according to Laurén's classification revealed a univariate prognostic impact of cathepsin D on both diffuse and intestinal types without independent value. For patients with high levels of uPA receptor (scores of 2 and 3, n = 132), a highly significant association of increasing evidence of cathepsin D with disease free survival (P < 0.0001) and overall survival (P < 0.0001) was observed for curatively resected patients. Significant association with survival was also observed for all patients (P = 0.0407).
CONCLUSIONS: Cathepsin D is a new functional prognostic parameter for gastric carcinoma patients with independent value for disease free survival. Moreover, this study indicates that consideration of more than one tumor-associated protease could lead to a more individualized estimation of risk for carcinoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9217027     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970715)80:2<179::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  Proteomic identification of differentially-expressed proteins in esophageal cancer in three ethnic groups in Xinjiang.

Authors:  Zan Liu; Jun-Guo Feng; Aerziguli Tuersun; Tao Liu; Hui Liu; Qing Liu; Shu-Tao Zheng; Cong-Gai Huang; Guo-Dong Lv; Ilyar Sheyhidin; Xiao-Mei Lu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Cathepsin D: an Mϕ-derived factor mediating increased endothelial cell permeability with implications for alteration of the blood-retinal barrier in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Finny Monickaraj; Paul G McGuire; Carolina Franco Nitta; Kaustabh Ghosh; Arup Das
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Significance of elevated levels of collagen type IV and hyaluronic acid in gastric juice and serum in gastric cancer and precancerous lesion.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Ruan; Ru-Tao Hong; Hui-Jun Xie; Nai-Zhong Hu; Jian-Ming Xu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Correlation between cathepsin D expression and p53 protein nuclear accumulation in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Ikeguchi; T Sakatani; T Ueta; K Fukuda; S Oka; K Hisamitsu; K Yamaguchi; S Tsujitani; N Kaibara
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Immunohistochemical molecular markers as predictors of curability of endoscopically resected submucosal colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Iwao Kaneko; Shinji Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Shigeto Yoshida; Toru Hiyama; Koji Arihiro; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Implication of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor induced neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis revealed by proteome analysis.

Authors:  Masayoshi Katano; Kazuki Okamoto; Mitsumi Arito; Yuki Kawakami; Manae S Kurokawa; Naoya Suematsu; Sonoko Shimada; Hiroshi Nakamura; Yang Xiang; Kayo Masuko; Kusuki Nishioka; Kazuo Yudoh; Tomohiro Kato
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Expression and Localization of Cathepsins B, D and G in Cancer Stem Cells in Liver Metastasis From Colon Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shreeja Mehrotra; Susrutha K Wickremesekera; Helen D Brasch; Bede Van Schaijik; Reginald W Marsh; Swee T Tan; Tinte Itinteang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-06-07

8.  Cathepsin E is a marker of gastric differentiation and signet-ring cell carcinoma of stomach: a novel suggestion on gastric tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Maki Konno-Shimizu; Nobutake Yamamichi; Ken-ichi Inada; Natsuko Kageyama-Yahara; Kazuya Shiogama; Yu Takahashi; Itsuko Asada-Hirayama; Mitsue Yamamichi-Nishina; Chiemi Nakayama; Satoshi Ono; Shinya Kodashima; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Yutaka Tsutsumi; Masao Ichinose; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cathepsin D Expression in Colorectal Cancer: From Proteomic Discovery through Validation Using Western Blotting, Immunohistochemistry, and Tissue Microarrays.

Authors:  Chandra Kirana; Hongjun Shi; Emma Laing; Kylie Hood; Rose Miller; Peter Bethwaite; John Keating; T William Jordan; Mark Hayes; Richard Stubbs
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2012-08-07

10.  AGR2 is associated with gastric cancer progression and poor survival.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Yongming Jin; Shaonan Xu; Jiayin Zheng; Q I Zhang; Yuanyu Wang; Jinping Chen; Yazeng Huang; Xujun He; Zhongsheng Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.