Literature DB >> 9216978

Spiral nerve cuff electrode for recordings of respiratory output.

M Sahin1, M A Haxhiu, D M Durand, I A Dreshaj.   

Abstract

The feasibility of using the spiral nerve cuff electrode design for recordings of respiratory output from the hypoglossal (HG) and phrenic nerves is demonstrated in anesthetized, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated cats. Raw neural discharges of the HG nerve were analyzed in terms of signal-to-noise ratios and frequency spectra. The rectified and integrated moving average activity of the HG nerve had a peak value of 1.74 +/- 0.21 microV and a baseline value of 0.72 +/- 0.11 microV at elevated respiratory drive induced by increases in CO2 or oxygen deprivation when recorded with 10-mm-long cuffs. The frequency content of the HG electroneurogram extended from several hundred hertz to 6 kHz. Spiral nerve cuff recordings without desheathing of the nerve provided large enough signal-to-noise ratios that allowed them to be used as a measure of respiratory output and had much wider frequency bandwidths than the hook electrode preparations. A major advantage of the cuff electrode over the hook electrode was its mechanical stability, which significantly improved the reproducibility of the recordings both in terms of signal amplitudes and frequency contents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9216978     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  9 in total

1.  A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Kathleen W Meacham; Richard J Giuly; Liang Guo; Shawn Hochman; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.838

2.  A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees.

Authors:  Philip P Vu; Alex K Vaskov; Zachary T Irwin; Phillip T Henning; Daniel R Lueders; Ann T Laidlaw; Alicia J Davis; Chrono S Nu; Deanna H Gates; R Brent Gillespie; Stephen W P Kemp; Theodore A Kung; Cynthia A Chestek; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Selective recovery of fascicular activity in peripheral nerves.

Authors:  B Wodlinger; D M Durand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Interfacing with the nervous system: a review of current bioelectric technologies.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Amin Mahmoodi; Jefferson W Chen; David T Chang; Omid Moshtaghi; Hamid R Djalilian; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  The future of upper extremity rehabilitation robotics: research and practice.

Authors:  Philip P Vu; Cynthia A Chestek; Samuel R Nason; Theodore A Kung; Stephen W P Kemp; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 6.  On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: review and discussion.

Authors:  Max Ortiz-Catalan; Rickard Brånemark; Bo Håkansson; Jean Delbeke
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Effect on signal-to-noise ratio of splitting the continuous contacts of cuff electrodes into smaller recording areas.

Authors:  Max Ortiz-Catalan; Jorge Marin-Millan; Jean Delbeke; Bo Håkansson; Rickard Brånemark
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Biomechanical and functional variation in rat sciatic nerve following cuff electrode implantation.

Authors:  Stephen M Restaino; Erkinay Abliz; Kelliann Wachrathit; Victor Krauthamer; Sameer B Shah
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Biological assessments of multifunctional hydrogel-decorated implantable neural cuff electrode for clinical neurology application.

Authors:  Han-Jun Kim; Dong Nyoung Heo; Yi Jae Lee; Sang Jin Lee; Ji Yoon Kang; Soo Hyun Lee; I I Keun Kwon; Sun Hee Do
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.