Literature DB >> 9216581

Surgical management of breast cancer in Australian women in 1993: analysis of Medicare statistics.

P S Craft1, J G Primrose, J A Lindner, P R McManus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns of surgical management of breast cancer among Australian women.
DESIGN: Retrospective survey of Medicare records (a national dataset of all services rendered on a "fee-for-service" basis for which a Medicare benefit has been paid). PATIENTS: All Australian women (4683) who underwent surgery consistent with being for breast cancer in 1993 and for which Medicare benefits were paid. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of women undergoing different forms of mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery and axillary surgery by patient age and State and region (urban or rural) of residence.
RESULTS: Modified radical mastectomy was the most common surgery, performed in 2097 of the 4683 women (44.8%), while 1868 (39.9%) had breast-conserving surgery. Frequency of breast conservation decreased significantly with age and varied significantly between States and region of residence. It ranged from 34% in Western Australia to 49% in South Australia and the Northern Territory, and from 34% among rural women to 42% among urban women. Axillary surgery was recorded for 83% of all women studied.
CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial geographical variation in patterns of surgical management for breast cancer. The tendency for rural women to undergo mastectomy rather than breast-conserving surgery may reflect the relative lack of access to postoperative radiotherapy. We are unable to explain the variation between States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9216581     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb123294.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  6 in total

1.  Geographic variation and physician specialization in the use of percutaneous biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Claire M B Holloway; Refik Saskin; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Walsh; James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon; Lindy Masya
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Systematic review of cancer treatment programmes in remote and rural areas.

Authors:  N C Campbell; L D Ritchie; J Cassidy; J Little
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Variations in outcomes by residential location for women with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paramita Dasgupta; Peter D Baade; Danny R Youlden; Gail Garvey; Joanne F Aitken; Isabella Wallington; Jennifer Chynoweth; Helen Zorbas; Philippa H Youl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Clinical outcome data for symptomatic breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Clinical Outcome Measures (BCCOM) Project.

Authors:  T Bates; O Kearins; I Monypenny; C Lagord; G Lawrence
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Indicators of breast cancer severity and appropriateness of surgery based on hospital administrative data in the Lazio Region, Italy.

Authors:  Patrizia Schifano; Paolo Papini; Nera Agabiti; Marina Scarinci; Piero Borgia; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.