Literature DB >> 9215824

Long-term follow-up of patients with good-risk germ cell tumors treated with etoposide and cisplatin.

H Xiao1, M Mazumdar, D F Bajorin, M Sarosdy, V Vlamis, J Spicer, J Ferrara, G J Bosl, R J Motzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the durability of response and overall survival for patients with good-risk metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT) treated with four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients treated with EP on two consecutive randomized trials for good-risk metastatic GCT were the subject of this retrospective study. The response to therapy, relapse and survival status, and results of salvage therapy are reported.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients (91%) achieved a complete response (CR). This included 182 patients (85%) who achieved a CR to chemotherapy alone and 13 patients (6%) who achieved a CR to chemotherapy plus surgical resection of viable GCT. Seventeen patients (9%) have relapsed from CR. The median time to relapse was 10 months, and the longest duration from treatment to relapse was 36 months in a patient who received three of four planned courses of therapy. Eight patients who either achieved an incomplete response (IR) or relapsed were rendered continuously disease-free by salvage therapy and are alive. One hundred eighty-three patients (86%) are alive at a median follow-up of 7.6 years.
CONCLUSION: Four cycles of EP constitute effective therapy and can be offered to patients with good-risk GCT. In patients with intermediate- and poor-risk GCT, clinical trials remain a priority to identify more effective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215824     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Kopp; Markus Kuczyk; Johannes Classen; Arnulf Stenzl; Lothar Kanz; Frank Mayer; Michael Bamberg; Jörg Thomas Hartmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael Jewett; Peter Chung; Sebastian Hotte; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eric Winquist; Scott North; Scott Tyldesley; Jeremy Sturgeon; Mary Gospodarowicz; Roanne Segal; Tina Cheng; Peter Venner; Malcolm Moore; Peter Albers; Robert Huddart; Craig Nichols; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  [Testicular cancer--is there an indication for adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy?].

Authors:  S Langenkamp; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of patients with testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  J T Hartmann; L Kanz; C Bokemeyer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Factors that impact the outcomes in testicular germ cell tumors in low-middle-income countries.

Authors:  S V Saju; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan; Trivadi S Ganesan; Manikandan Dhanushkodi; Anand Raja; Ganesarajah Selvaluxmy; Tenali Gnana Sagar
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Germ cell tumor and Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: A treatment dilemma.

Authors:  Abdul Hannan; Muhammad Faisal Khalid; Samia Yasmeen
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.