Literature DB >> 9215332

Surrogate and physician understanding of patients' preferences for living permanently in a nursing home.

T J Mattimore1, N S Wenger, N A Desbiens, J M Teno, M B Hamel, H Liu, R Califf, A F Connors, J Lynn, R K Oye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' willingness to live permanently in a nursing home and surrogate and physician understanding of that preference.
DESIGN: Evaluation of cross-sectional interview data from a cohort study.
SETTING: Five academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Seriously ill hospitalized adults enrolled in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). MEASUREMENTS: Patients' willingness to live permanently in a nursing home was measured on a 5-point scale ranging from "very willing" to "rather die." Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify patient demographic and clinical characteristics associated with this preference. Surrogate and physician perceptions of patient preferences were compared with patients' responses, and factors associated independently with surrogate and physician understanding of patient preference were identified.
RESULTS: Of 9105 patients, 3262 (36%) provided responses to the study question: 7% were "very willing" to live permanently in a nursing home, 19% "somewhat willing," 11% "somewhat unwilling," 26% "very unwilling," and 30% would "rather die." Older age was associated independently with less willingness to live permanently in a nursing home (odds ratio [OR] = .90 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 0.96). Patients with more education (OR = 1.03 per year; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) and more disabilities (OR = 1.05 per disability; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.09), and black patients (OR = 1.46 compared with white patients; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.76) were more willing to live in a nursing home. Surrogates understood 61% of patients' nursing home preferences but identified only 35% of patients who were willing to live permanently in a nursing home. Physicians identified 18% of patients willing to live permanently in a nursing home.
CONCLUSION: Patient attitudes about living permanently in a nursing home can be elicited, cannot be reliably predicted from demographic and clinical variables, and are frequently misunderstood by surrogates and physicians. Elicitation of patient preferences regarding permanent nursing home placement should be explored before patients become unable to participate in decision making in order to enhance the concordance of patient preference with the way they spend the end of their lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215332     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01508.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  33 in total

1.  Outcome trajectories for assisted living and nursing facility residents in Oregon.

Authors:  J R Frytak; R A Kane; M D Finch; R L Kane; R Maude-Griffin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Need for, availability of, and barriers to the provision of long-term care services for older American Indians.

Authors:  Lori L Jervis; M Yvonne Jackson; Spero M Manson
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2002-12

Review 3.  Optimizing the management of elderly colorectal surgery patients.

Authors:  Kok-Yang Tan; Fumio Konishi; Lawrence Tan; Wui-Kin Chin; Hean-Yee Ong; Phyllis Tan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.

Authors:  Lauren W Cohen; Sheryl Zimmerman; David Reed; Patrick Brown; Barbara J Bowers; Kimberly Nolet; Sandra Hudak; Susan Horn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; G Caleb Alexander; John Lantos
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Physical performance characteristics of assisted living residents and risk for adverse health outcomes.

Authors:  Carol A Giuliani; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Nan S Park; Lori A Schrodt; Franzi Rokoske; Philip D Sloane; Sheryl Zimmerman
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2008-04

Review 7.  Long stay care and the NHS: discontinuities between policy and practice.

Authors:  A R Turrell; C M Castleden; B Freestone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-03

8.  The Care Span: Medicaid savings resulted when community health workers matched those with needs to home and community care.

Authors:  Holly C Felix; Glen P Mays; M Kathryn Stewart; Naomi Cottoms; Mary Olson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Home Return After Surgery in Patients Aged over 85 Years is Associated with Preoperative Albumin Levels, the Type of Surgery, and APACHE II Score.

Authors:  Bora Lee; Sungwon Na; Miran Park; Sungyeon Ham; Jeongmin Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Defining and Measuring Nursing Home Placement.

Authors:  Vincent Mor; Kali S Thomas; Momotazur Rahman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.