Literature DB >> 9215328

Deaths caused by bedrails.

K Parker1, S H Miles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine how bedrails cause death in order to suggest clinical and ergonomic changes to prevent such deaths and to promote research to improve the use and design of bed systems.
DESIGN: A review of reports of adult deaths and injuries from bedrails contained in the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission Death Certificate File and its Reported Incidents File and its National Injury Information Clearinghouse Accident Investigations from 1993 to 1996. Deaths involving the use of vest restraints were excluded. We reconstructed, reenacted, and have graphically depicted major patterns of deaths. A review of the literature to 1966 was also done.
RESULTS: The 74 deaths described are categorized into three types: (1) 70% were entrapments between the mattress and a rail so that the face was pressed against the mattress, (2) 18% were entrapment and compression of the neck within the rails, and (3) 12% were deaths caused by being trapped by the rails after sliding partially off the bed and having the neck flexed or the chest compressed.
CONCLUSIONS: Deaths from bedrails are underrecognized and preventable clinical events that can occur in any medical setting. Preventing these events will require a unified redesign of the relationships between rails, mattresses, and beds, which are now often assembled and used as separate products. Clinicians can prevent many of these deaths by using bedrails much more judiciously, confirming the proper relationships between beds, rails and mattresses, and using alarms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215328     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  8 in total

1.  Electronic tagging of people with dementia who wander.

Authors:  Julian C Hughes; Stephen J Louw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-19

2.  [Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce physical restraints in nursing home residents with dementia].

Authors:  P Koczy; T Klie; M Kron; D Bredthauer; U Rissmann; S Branitzki; V Guerra; A Klein; T Pfundstein; Th Nikolaus; S Sander; C Becker
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Use of physical restraint in nursing homes: clinical-ethical considerations.

Authors:  C Gastmans; K Milisen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  A case-control study of patient, medication, and care-related risk factors for inpatient falls.

Authors:  Melissa J Krauss; Bradley Evanoff; Eileen Hitcho; Kinyungu E Ngugi; William Claiborne Dunagan; Irene Fischer; Stanley Birge; Shirley Johnson; Eileen Costantinou; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Do split-side rails present an increased risk to patient safety?

Authors:  S Hignett; P Griffiths
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-04

6.  Factors relating to the use of physical restraints in psychogeriatric care: a paradigm for elder abuse.

Authors:  D Bredthauer; C Becker; B Eichner; P Koczy; Th Nikolaus
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  The effect of a restraint reduction program on physical restraint rates in rehabilitation settings in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Claudia K Y Lai; Susan K Y Chow; Lorna K P Suen; Ivan Y C Wong
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2011-09-06

8.  Implementation of a Multicomponent intervention to Prevent Physical Restraints In Nursing home residenTs (IMPRINT): study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jens Abraham; Ralph Möhler; Adrienne Henkel; Ramona Kupfer; Andrea Icks; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Burkhard Haastert; Gabriele Meyer; Sascha Köpke
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.921

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.