Literature DB >> 9215327

Effects of a restraint reduction intervention and OBRA '87 regulations on psychoactive drug use in nursing homes.

E L Siegler1, E Capezuti, G Maislin, M Baumgarten, L Evans, N Strumpf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in psychoactive drug use in nursing homes after implementation of physical restraint reduction interventions and mandates of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA '87).
METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a controlled clinical trial that took place in three nursing homes: a control home, one that received an educational intervention, and one that received an educational/consultation intervention. All three homes were influenced by the OBRA mandates. Complete pre- and 6 months' post-intervention data on use of psychoactive drugs and physical restraints were available for 446 resident subjects. Changes were first analyzed with the resident subjects as the unit of analysis and then using the nursing home ward (n = 16) as the unit of analysis.
RESULTS: While physical restraint use declined in the home that received the educational/consultation intervention, neither neuroleptic nor benzodiazepine use increased in any of the homes after the interventions. The percentage of residents taking neuroleptics declined in the control home (18.6% to 11.3%, P = .014). Benzodiazepine use, which was more prevalent than described previously in the literature, declined in all three homes (P < .001). Of those residents whose physical restraints were discontinued, only 2% were started on neuroleptics. When the effect of OBRA mandates on appropriateness of neuroleptic use was examined, the percentage of residents on neuroleptics who lacked an OBRA-approved indication declined from 21.3% to 14.6% in the total sample, and from 39.9% to 8% in the control home.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce physical restraint did not lead to an increase in psychoactive drug use; further, reduction in both can occur simultaneously. OBRA mandates regarding psychoactive drug use were not uniformly effective, but appear, at minimum, to have increased awareness of the indications for neuroleptics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215327     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01503.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  9 in total

Review 1.  Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  E Sailas; M Fenton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

2.  OBRA 1987 and the quality of nursing home care.

Authors:  Virender Kumar; Edward C Norton; William E Encinosa
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2006-03

3.  The effects of public reporting on physical restraints and antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe cognitive impairment.

Authors:  R Tamara Konetzka; Daniel J Brauner; Joseph Shega; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 4.  Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents.

Authors:  Tanja Richter; Gabriele Meyer; Ralph Möhler; Sascha Köpke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 5.  Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints in long-term geriatric care.

Authors:  Ralph Möhler; Tanja Richter; Sascha Köpke; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-02-16

6.  Medicare payment policy in skilled nursing facilities: Lessons from a history of mixed success.

Authors:  Rachel Prusynski
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals.

Authors:  Ian D Cameron; Suzanne M Dyer; Claire E Panagoda; Geoffrey R Murray; Keith D Hill; Robert G Cumming; Ngaire Kerse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-07

Review 8.  A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists: what is the quality of the evidence?

Authors:  Faith Donald; Kelley Kilpatrick; Kim Reid; Nancy Carter; Ruth Martin-Misener; Denise Bryant-Lukosius; Patricia Harbman; Sharon Kaasalainen; Deborah A Marshall; Renee Charbonneau-Smith; Erin E Donald; Monique Lloyd; Abigail Wickson-Griffiths; Jennifer Yost; Pamela Baxter; Esther Sangster-Gormley; Pamela Hubley; Célyne Laflamme; Marsha Campbell-Yeo; Sheri Price; Jennifer Boyko; Alba DiCenso
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-01

9.  Patients Aged 80 Years or Older are Encountered More Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use.

Authors:  Li Mo; Ding Ding; Shi-Yun Pu; Qin-Hui Liu; Hong Li; Bi-Rong Dong; Xiao-Yan Yang; Jin-Han He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.