Literature DB >> 9215227

Household and dwelling contact as risk factors for leprosy in northern Malawi.

P E Fine1, J A Sterne, J M Pönnighaus, L Bliss, J Saui, A Chihana, M Munthali, D K Warndorff.   

Abstract

Data on household and dwelling contact with known leprosy cases were available on more than 80,000 initially disease-free individuals followed up during the 1980s in a rural district of northern Malawi. A total of 331 new cases of leprosy were diagnosed among them. Individuals recorded as living in household or dwelling contact with multibacillary patients at the start of follow-up were at approximately five- to eightfold increased risk of leprosy, respectively, compared with individuals not living in such households or dwellings. Individuals living in household or dwelling contact with paucibacillary cases were both at approximately twofold increased risk. The higher risk associated with multibacillary contact and the fact that dwelling contact entailed a greater risk than household contact if the association was with multibacillary, but not with paucibacillary, disease suggest that paucibacillary cases may not themselves be sources of transmission, but rather just markers that a household has had contact with some (outside) source of infection. When household contact was considered alone, the risks of disease were appreciably higher for younger than for older contacts and for male compared with female contacts. Despite the elevated risk of leprosy associated with household or dwelling contact, only 15% of all incidence cases arose among recognized household contacts. Given the dynamic nature of household membership and consequent misclassification of contact status, the true contribution to overall incidence of contact within household or dwelling settings is likely to be much higher than this, perhaps 30% or higher. Considering the predilection of males for infectious multibacillary forms of the disease, the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae at an early age, in particular to males, may be of particular importance for the persistence of leprosy in endemic communities. Although residential contact with a multibacillary case is the strongest known determinant of leprosy risk, the vast majority of such contacts never manifest disease, which indicates a crucial role for genetic and/or environmental factors in the transmission of M. leprae infection and/or the pathogenesis of clinical leprosy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215227     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  44 in total

1.  Evaluation of various cytokines elicited during antigen-specific recall as potential risk indicators for the differential development of leprosy.

Authors:  L H Sampaio; A L M Sousa; M C Barcelos; S G Reed; M M A Stefani; M S Duthie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Presence of human T-cell responses to the Mycobacterium leprae 45-kilodalton antigen reflects infection with or exposure to M. leprae.

Authors:  A Macfarlane; R Mondragon-Gonzalez; F Vega-Lopez; B Wieles; J de Pena; O Rodriguez; R Suarez y de la Torre; R R de Vries; T H Ottenhoff; H M Dockrell
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-05

3.  Diversity of potential short tandem repeats in Mycobacterium leprae and application for molecular typing.

Authors:  Liangfen Zhang; Teky Budiawan; Masanori Matsuoka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Risk and protective factors for leprosy development determined by epidemiological surveillance of household contacts.

Authors:  Isabela M B Goulart; Dulcinéa O Bernardes Souza; Carolina R Marques; Vânia L Pimenta; Maria A Gonçalves; Luiz R Goulart
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-11-07

5.  Rational design and evaluation of a multiepitope chimeric fusion protein with the potential for leprosy diagnosis.

Authors:  Malcolm S Duthie; Marah N Hay; Cecile Z Morales; Lauren Carter; Raodoh Mohamath; Lucia Ito; Luiza K M Oyafuso; Marli I P Manini; Marivic V Balagon; Esterlina V Tan; Paul R Saunderson; Steven G Reed; Darrick Carter
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-12-16

6.  Multiplex PCR technique could be an alternative approach for early detection of leprosy among close contacts--a pilot study from India.

Authors:  Surajita Banerjee; Kamalesh Sarkar; Soma Gupta; Prasanta Sinha Mahapatra; Siddhartha Gupta; Samudra Guha; Debasis Bandhopadhayay; Chaitry Ghosal; Suman Kalyan Paine; Rathindra Nath Dutta; Nibir Biswas; Basudev Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Different mechanisms for heterogeneity in leprosy susceptibility can explain disease clustering within households.

Authors:  Egil Fischer; Sake De Vlas; Abraham Meima; Dik Habbema; Jan Richardus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prospective study of serological conversion as a risk factor for development of leprosy among household contacts.

Authors:  J T Douglas; R V Cellona; T T Fajardo; R M Abalos; M V F Balagon; P R Klatser
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-09

9.  Use of protein antigens for early serological diagnosis of leprosy.

Authors:  Malcolm S Duthie; Wakako Goto; Greg C Ireton; Stephen T Reece; Ludimila P V Cardoso; Celina M T Martelli; Mariane M A Stefani; Maria Nakatani; Robson Crusue de Jesus; Eduardo M Netto; Ma V F Balagon; Esterlina Tan; Robert H Gelber; Yumi Maeda; Masahiko Makino; Dan Hoft; Steven G Reed
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-09-26

10.  Genotyping of Mycobacterium leprae on the basis of the polymorphism of TTC repeats for analysis of leprosy transmission.

Authors:  Masanori Matsuoka; Liangfen Zhang; Teky Budiawan; Keisuke Saeki; Shinzo Izumi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.