Literature DB >> 9215205

Surgical intensive care unit care after ovarian cancer surgery: an analysis of indications.

M Amir1, M M Shabot, B Y Karlan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to develop a profile of preoperative and perioperative characteristics that would enable gynecologic oncologists to identify those patients with ovarian cancer who would benefit most from postoperative surgical intensive care unit care and thereby optimize resource utilization and cost effectiveness. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was performed of 85 patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit after cytoreductive surgery between Jan. 1, 1989, and Dec. 31, 1993. Fifty-three patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for < 24 hours were compared with 32 patients admitted for > 24 hours. Five preoperative characteristics (age, American Society of Anaesthesiology classification, body mass index, albumin, primary versus recurrent disease) and six perioperative characteristics (estimated blood loss, ascites, surgical time, bowel resection, Swan-Ganz catheter, ventilator dependence) were compared across the two groups by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: All preoperative variables were similar across the two groups. Ascites volume and length of surgery were not significant, whereas estimated blood loss was significant in the univariate analysis but not in the logistic regression analysis. Three perioperative variables were found to be predictive of extended surgical intensive care unit care by logistic regression analysis: placement of a Swan-Ganz catheter (odds ratio 4.31, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 16.4), bowel resection (odds ratio 13.0, 95% confidence interval 1.96 to 86.5), and ventilator dependence (excluded from logistic regression analysis for mathematic reasons).
CONCLUSIONS: The patient's preoperative medical condition proved to be less important than how she fares during surgery. The patient most likely to benefit from surgical intensive care unit care had undergone bowel resection, required invasive hemodynamic monitoring, or was ventilator dependent postoperatively. This patient profile may prove to be a useful screening tool to optimize resource utilization and cost effectiveness, but it cannot replace clinical judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215205     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70366-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Post-intensive care unit syndrome in gynecologic oncology patients.

Authors:  Camille C Gunderson; Adam C Walter; Rachel Ruskin; Kai Ding; Kathleen N Moore
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Postoperative Admission in Critical Care Units Following Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: Outcomes Based on a Systematic Review and Authors' Recommendations.

Authors:  Nikolaos Thomakos; Anastasia Prodromidou; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Nikolaos Machairas; Alexandros Rodolakis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Clinical Factors Associated with Longer Hospital Stay Following Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher G Smith; Daniel L Davenport; Justin Gorski; Anthony McDowell; Brian T Burgess; Tricia I Fredericks; Lauren A Baldwin; Rachel W Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Charles S Dietrich; Holly H Gallion; Edward J Pavlik; John R van Nagell; Frederick R Ueland
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-03

4.  Need for critical care in gynaecology: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Seppo Heinonen; Esko Tyrväinen; Jorma Penttinen; Seppo Saarikoski; Esko Ruokonen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.