Literature DB >> 9215186

Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.

W H Hindle1, E C Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document the observation that fine-needle aspiration of palpable breast masses by use of a modified technique performed shortly before mammography need not adversely interfere with mammographic interpretation nor produce falsely suspicious mammographic lesions that delay meaningful evaluation and management in this breast clinic. STUDY
DESIGN: In a retrospective record review 1007 women who were seen in the Breast Diagnostic Center at Women's and Children's Hospital from January 1992 until April 1995 and who had fine-needle aspiration of a palpable solid breast mass within 2 weeks before mammography were analyzed overall and in 10-year age group subsets. The mammographic reports of "suspicious" lesions were correlated with having had a prior fine-needle aspiration (within 2 weeks).
RESULTS: Of the 1007 women undergoing fine-needle aspirations, 91 had a cytologic or tissue biopsy specimen diagnosis of malignancy. Of these, 72 had "suspicious" mammograms and 19 had "nonsuspicious" mammograms. The calculated positive predictive value was 58%. The negative predictive value was 98%. Mammographic sensitivity was 79%. Specificity was 94%. Age stratification did not reveal any meaningful trends. Of the 916 patients with benign cytologic results of fine-needle aspiration specimens, 52 had "suspicious" mammograms and 864 had "nonsuspicious" mammograms.
CONCLUSION: For patient convenience and expeditious diagnosis of a palpable breast mass, fine-needle aspiration can be performed on the initial visit and mammograms subsequently taken within 2 weeks without undue clinical confusion or misleading mammographic findings. Concordance of the diagnostic triad consisting of (1) clinical impression (by history and examination), (2) fine-needle aspiration, and (3) mammography gives a reliable conclusion and can appropriately be used as the basis for clinical management of a breast mass. However, when there is doubt or anxiety about the diagnosis either on the part of the patient or the physician, a definitive histologic tissue diagnosis should obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215186     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70347-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Spectral-domain low coherence interferometry/optical coherence tomography system for fine needle breast biopsy guidance.

Authors:  N V Iftimia; M Mujat; T Ustun; R D Ferguson; V Danthu; D X Hammer
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Automated algorithm for breast tissue differentiation in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mircea Mujat; R Daniel Ferguson; Daniel X Hammer; Christopher Gittins; Nicusor Iftimia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Office management of a palpable breast lump with aspiration.

Authors:  Ruth E Heisey; David R McCready
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Clinical feasibility of microscopically-guided breast needle biopsy using a fiber-optic probe with computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Freddy T Nguyen; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Patricia A Johnson; Kendrith M Rowland; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-10

5.  Miniature swept source for point of care optical frequency domain imaging.

Authors:  Brian D Goldberg; S M R Motaghian Nezam; Priyanka Jillella; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.