Literature DB >> 9215023

Comparison of the effects of ketamine-midazolam with those of fentanyl-midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during major spine surgery.

O Langeron1, F Lille, O Zerhouni, G Orliaguet, G Saillant, B Riou, P Coriat.   

Abstract

Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) allow monitoring of spinal cord function during surgery. Ketamine has been shown to enhance CSEP amplitude, but there is no previous study comparing its effects with those of other anaesthetic regimens. Therefore, we have compared the effects of ketamine with those of fentanyl, both combined with midazolam, on CSEP monitoring during major spine surgery. Twenty patients with normal preoperative CSEP were allocated randomly to a ketamine or fentanyl group. Anaesthesia was induced with ketamine 3 mg kg-1 or fentanyl 6 micrograms kg-1 i.v., and midazolam 0.3 mg kg-1 i.v in both groups, and maintained with continuous i.v infusion of ketamine 2 mg kg-1 h-1 or fentanyl 3 micrograms kg-1 h-1, combined in both groups with midazolam 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1 and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. CSEP were elicited by tibial posterior nerve stimulation and measured P1 and N1 latencies, and P1-N1 amplitude, CSEP were recorded before and after induction, at 15 min, 1 and 2 h after induction, during skin closure and after removal of nitrous oxide. Both groups were comparable in characteristics, duration of surgery, mean arterial pressure and temperature. CSEP latencies were not significantly affected in either group. CSEP amplitude decreased significantly over time in the fentanyl group (from mean 2.02 (SEM 0.41) to 0.95 (0.17) microV, P < 0.05), but not in the ketamine group (from 1.33 (0.36) to 1.05 (0.31) microV, ns). Nevertheless, we did not observe any significant differences in amplitudes or latencies between the two groups. The delay in obtaining the first voluntary postoperative motor response was significantly greater in the ketamine group (170 (54) vs 55 (17) min, P < 0.01). Both ketamine and fentanyl allowed us to obtain reliable CSEP during major spine surgery, and there were no significant difference between these two anaesthetic regimens for CSEP monitoring, but a longer delay for voluntary postoperative motor assessment was observed in the ketamine group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215023     DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.6.701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Anesthesia and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in children.

Authors:  Tod Sloan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Ketamine pharmacology: an update (pharmacodynamics and molecular aspects, recent findings).

Authors:  Georges Mion; Thierry Villevieille
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.243

4.  Ketamine-Based Anesthetic Protocols and Evoked Potential Monitoring: A Risk/Benefit Overview.

Authors:  Nicoleta Stoicea; Gregory Versteeg; Diana Florescu; Nicholas Joseph; Juan Fiorda-Diaz; Víctor Navarrete; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.