Literature DB >> 9214661

Global similarities in nucleotide base composition among disparate functional classes of single-stranded RNA imply adaptive evolutionary convergence.

E Schultes1, P T Hraber, T H LaBean.   

Abstract

The number of distinct functional classes of single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) and the number of sequences representing them are substantial and continue to increase. Organizing this data in an evolutionary context is essential, yet traditional comparative sequence analyses require that homologous sites can be identified. This prevents comparative analysis between sequences of different functional classes that share no site-to-site sequence similarity. Analysis within a single evolutionary lineage also limits evolutionary inference because shared ancestry confounds properties of molecular structure and function that are historically contingent with those that are imposed for biophysical reasons. Here, we apply a method of comparative analysis to ssRNAs that is not restricted to homologous sequences, and therefore enables comparison between distantly related or unrelated sequences, minimizing the effects of shared ancestry. This method is based on statistical similarities in nucleotide base composition among different functional classes of ssRNAs. In order to denote base composition unambiguously, we have calculated the fraction G+A and G+U content, in addition to the more commonly used fraction G+C content. These three parameters define RNA composition space, which we have visualized using interactive graphics software. We have examined the distribution of nucleotide composition from 15 distinct functional classes of ssRNAs from organisms spanning the universal phylogenetic tree and artificial ribozymes evolved in vitro. Surprisingly, these distributions are biased consistently in G+A and G+U content, both within and between functional classes, regardless of the more variable G+C content. Additionally, an analysis of the base composition of secondary structural elements indicates that paired and unpaired nucleotides, known to have different evolutionary rates, also have significantly different compositional biases. These universal compositional biases observed among ssRNAs sharing little or no sequence similarity suggest, contrary to current understanding, that base composition biases constitute a convergent adaptation among a wide variety of molecular functions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9214661      PMCID: PMC1369525     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  21 in total

1.  In vitro RNA random pools are not structurally diverse: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Jana Gevertz; Hin Hark Gan; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Natural selection is not required to explain universal compositional patterns in rRNA secondary structure categories.

Authors:  Sandra Smit; Michael Yarus; Rob Knight
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Variation among species in proteomic sulphur content is related to environmental conditions.

Authors:  Jason G Bragg; Dominique Thomas; Peggy Baudouin-Cornu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A computational proposal for designing structured RNA pools for in vitro selection of RNAs.

Authors:  Namhee Kim; Hin Hark Gan; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  Natural and artificial RNAs occupy the same restricted region of sequence space.

Authors:  Ryan Kennedy; Manuel E Lladser; Zhiyuan Wu; Chen Zhang; Michael Yarus; Hans De Sterck; Rob Knight
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 6.  Improving the odds: Influence of starting pools on in vitro selection outcomes.

Authors:  Kelsey Pobanz; Andrej Lupták
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Monomer abundance distribution patterns as a universal biosignature: examples from terrestrial and digital life.

Authors:  Evan D Dorn; Kenneth H Nealson; Christoph Adami
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Distribution of genotype network sizes in sequence-to-structure genotype-phenotype maps.

Authors:  Susanna Manrubia; José A Cuesta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Different evolutionary trajectories of European avian-like and classical swine H1N1 influenza A viruses.

Authors:  Eleca J Dunham; Vivien G Dugan; Emilee K Kaser; Sarah E Perkins; Ian H Brown; Edward C Holmes; Jeffery K Taubenberger
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  RNA structure prediction from evolutionary patterns of nucleotide composition.

Authors:  S Smit; R Knight; J Heringa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.