Literature DB >> 9212599

De facto gatekeeping and informed consent in intensive care.

R C Burrows1, R E Hodgson.   

Abstract

Medical decision-making is based on the doctrine of informed consent which is, in turn, based on autonomy, which represents one of four pillars of medical ethics, the others being beneficence, non-malfeasance and social justice. Decision-making in intensive care with respect to the withdrawal of treatment, in particular ventilator therapy, is often extremely difficult for patients or their relatives and they would rather not make any decision other than to insist on the maintenance of therapy in spite of sound, reasonable medical advice that such therapy is of no value to the patient. Aside from issues of a dignified death, this is likely to be to the detriment of other patients who might be refused admission to intensive care and thus is counter to the dictates of social justice. Under these circumstances, there would appear to be a need to give authority to the reasonable medical decision to discontinue resuscitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9212599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Law        ISSN: 0723-1393


  2 in total

1.  What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.

Authors:  H El-Wakeel; G J Taylor; J J T Tate
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Informed consent: the rate-limiting step in acute stroke trials.

Authors:  David Z Rose; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.