Literature DB >> 9212247

Primary- and secondary-like jaw-muscle spindle afferents have characteristic topographic distributions.

D Dessem1, R Donga, P Luo.   

Abstract

Single jaw-muscle spindle afferent axons were characterized physiologically and intracellularly stained to determine whether particular physiological types of spindle afferent show distinctive morphologies. Microelectrodes filled with either horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or biotinamide (Neurobiotin) were advanced into the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (Vme) in anesthetized rats. Intracellular recordings then were characterized by their response: to palpation of the jaw muscles; when pressure was applied to the teeth and during passive ramp and hold and sinusoidal jaw movement. Seventy-one afferents were characterized physiologically and injected with HRP; an additional 61 afferents were typed and injected with biotinamide. The response of 43 stained neurons was recorded in the presence of suxamethonium. The major projection areas of these afferents were the: trigeminal motor nucleus (Vmo); region dorsal to Vmo; reticular formation, spinal trigeminal nucleus, superior cerebellar peduncle and Vme. One afferent type was modulated strongly during stretching of the jaw-elevator muscles. Based on their high sensitivity during stretching of the jaw muscles and/or their silencing during the release phase of muscle stretch, these afferents were classified as primary-like spindle afferents. These afferents projected most strongly to Vmo. A second type of afferent was modulated only modestly during stretching of the jaw-elevator muscles. These tonic afferents were classified as secondary-like spindle afferents because of their low dynamic sensitivity during ramp muscle stretch and their continued discharge during the release phase of muscle stretch. Secondary-like afferents projected most strongly to the region dorsal to Vmo. Boutons (n = 3,834) from 11 afferents were studied in detail. Secondary-like afferents had statistically larger boutons within Vmo. In both secondary- and primary-like spindle afferents, only a small number of boutons were associated closely with the somata and proximal dendrites of trigeminal motoneurons. In these cases, however, two to five boutons appeared to contact individual motoneurons, implying multiple monosynaptic inputs to a selective subset of jaw-elevator motoneurons. Some "giant" boutons were present dorsal to Vmo and in Vme. These results demonstrate that dynamically sensitive and nondynamically sensitive jaw-elevator muscle spindle afferents project preferentially to different regions. Primary-like spindle afferents are capable of providing feedback related to the dynamic phases of muscle stretch and project most heavily to Vmo. Secondary-like spindle afferents can transmit a feedback signal associated with muscle length and project most strongly to the supratrigeminal region. Both types of afferent have projections caudal to Vmo that may serve longer latency jaw-muscle stretch reflexes and/or the projection of proprioceptive information to the thalamus and cerebellum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9212247     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.2925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Membrane resonance and subthreshold membrane oscillations in mesencephalic V neurons: participants in burst generation.

Authors:  N Wu; C F Hsiao; S H Chandler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spinal projection of spindle afferents of the longissimus lumborum muscles of the cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents (Ih) in neurones of the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  B S Khakh; G Henderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Physiological, morphological and neurochemical characterization of neurons modulated by movement.

Authors:  Dean Dessem
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The Cerebellar Cortex Receives Orofacial Proprioceptive Signals from the Supratrigeminal Nucleus via the Mossy Fiber Pathway in Rats.

Authors:  Yumi Tsutsumi; Fumihiko Sato; Takahiro Furuta; Katsuro Uchino; Masayuki Moritani; Yong Chul Bae; Takafumi Kato; Yoshihisa Tachibana; Atsushi Yoshida
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Spatiotemporal Profiles of Proprioception Processed by the Masseter Muscle Spindles in Rat Cerebral Cortex: An Optical Imaging Study.

Authors:  Satoshi Fujita; Mari Kaneko; Hiroko Nakamura; Masayuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 7.  Trigeminal, Visceral and Vestibular Inputs May Improve Cognitive Functions by Acting through the Locus Coeruleus and the Ascending Reticular Activating System: A New Hypothesis.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Cicco; Maria P Tramonti Fantozzi; Enrico Cataldo; Massimo Barresi; Luca Bruschini; Ugo Faraguna; Diego Manzoni
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.856

8.  Electromyography and Fos immunostaining study establish a possible functional link between trigeminal proprioception and the oculomotor system in rats.

Authors:  Houcheng Liang; Jingdong Zhang; Pifu Luo; Hongna Zhu; Ying Qiao; Anle Su; Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2017-01-19

9.  Suppression of the Swallowing Reflex during Rhythmic Jaw Movements Induced by Repetitive Electrical Stimulation of the Dorsomedial Part of the Central Amygdaloid Nucleus in Rats.

Authors:  Yoshihide Satoh; Kojun Tsuji
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.