Literature DB >> 9211392

A comparison of RIGR and SVD dynamic imaging methods.

J M Hanson1, Z P Liang, R L Magin, J L Duerk, P C Lauterbur.   

Abstract

Several constrained imaging methods have recently been proposed for dynamic imaging applications. This paper compares two of these methods: the Reduced-encoding Imaging by Generalized-series Reconstruction (RIGR) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods. RIGR utilizes a priori data for optimal image reconstruction whereas the SVD method seeks to optimize data acquisition. However, this study shows that the existing SVD encoding method tends to bias the data acquisition scheme toward reproducing the known features in the reference image. This characteristic of the SVD encoding method reduces its capability to capture new image features and makes it less suitable than RIGR for dynamic imaging applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9211392     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910380122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  2 in total

1.  Bayesian parallel imaging with edge-preserving priors.

Authors:  Ashish Raj; Gurmeet Singh; Ramin Zabih; Bryan Kressler; Yi Wang; Norbert Schuff; Michael Weiner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  SVD compression for magnetic resonance fingerprinting in the time domain.

Authors:  Debra F McGivney; Eric Pierre; Dan Ma; Yun Jiang; Haris Saybasili; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 10.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.