BACKGROUND: Several chemotherapy studies have suggested that continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is more effective than bolus 5-FU. In addition, 5-FU and cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum-II (cisplatin) in combination have been shown to have synergistic cytotoxicity against several human neoplasms. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of continuous infusion of 5-FU and low dose cisplatin infusion (FP therapy) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma. The relationship between the response to FP therapy and several factors was also examined. METHODS: A total of 26 patients fulfilling standard eligibility criteria were enrolled in the trial. FP therapy consisted of 5-FU (350 mg/m2/day every day by continuous infusion) and cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2/day in 100 mL of normal saline infused over 1 hour on Days 1-5 every week) for 4 weeks. RESULTS: A complete response was observed in 2 cases and a partial response in 11 cases, for an overall response rate of 50%. Patients with good performance status (PS) (0-1) and differentiated histologic type showed higher response rates (50.0% and 63.6%, respectively) than patients with poor PS (2 or 3) and undifferentiated histologic type (28.6% and 35.3%, respectively), although there were no significant differences. Patients with low serum levels of immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP) showed a significantly higher response rate (71.4%) than those with high IAP levels (0%). Toxic effects included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting; these were not life-threatening and did not require treatment interruption. CONCLUSIONS: FP therapy is a promising regimen for patients with advanced and recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma. Serum levels of IAP may predict chemosensitivity.
BACKGROUND: Several chemotherapy studies have suggested that continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is more effective than bolus 5-FU. In addition, 5-FU and cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum-II (cisplatin) in combination have been shown to have synergistic cytotoxicity against several humanneoplasms. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of continuous infusion of 5-FU and low dose cisplatin infusion (FP therapy) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma. The relationship between the response to FP therapy and several factors was also examined. METHODS: A total of 26 patients fulfilling standard eligibility criteria were enrolled in the trial. FP therapy consisted of 5-FU (350 mg/m2/day every day by continuous infusion) and cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2/day in 100 mL of normal saline infused over 1 hour on Days 1-5 every week) for 4 weeks. RESULTS: A complete response was observed in 2 cases and a partial response in 11 cases, for an overall response rate of 50%. Patients with good performance status (PS) (0-1) and differentiated histologic type showed higher response rates (50.0% and 63.6%, respectively) than patients with poor PS (2 or 3) and undifferentiated histologic type (28.6% and 35.3%, respectively), although there were no significant differences. Patients with low serum levels of immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP) showed a significantly higher response rate (71.4%) than those with high IAP levels (0%). Toxic effects included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting; these were not life-threatening and did not require treatment interruption. CONCLUSIONS: FP therapy is a promising regimen for patients with advanced and recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma. Serum levels of IAP may predict chemosensitivity.