BACKGROUND: A comparison of the oral bioavailability of cyclosporine from the original formulation (CsA) and from the new formulation, cyclosporine for microemulsion (CsA-ME), was made in pediatric maintenance liver transplant patients within two age groups (group 1, ages 1-5 years; group 2, ages 6-17 years) in an open-label, multicenter, randomized crossover trial. All patients were at least 6 months past transplantation and were receiving CsA maintenance therapy. METHODS: In study period 1 (days 1 through 14), patients were administered either CsA or CsA-ME at the same b.i.d. dosage as their maintenance therapy. Upon entry into period 2 (days 15 through 28), patients were converted to the alternate formulation at a 1:1 mg dose ratio. On day 29, all patients returned to the CsA treatment administered at study entry, with follow-up on day 35. Dosage adjustments were not allowed with either CsA or CsA-ME. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiling was performed at the end of periods 1 and 2. RESULTS: Both the mean area under the concentration-versus-time curve and the mean maximum blood concentration of cyclosporine-both normalized for dose-were significantly increased: by 66% and 109%, respectively, in patients receiving CsA-ME compared with those receiving CsA in group 1 and by 39% and 75%, respectively, in group 2. During this study, liver function remained stable, and serum creatinine and blood pressure did not differ significantly between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows increased bioavailability in all patients converted to CsA-ME, with the greatest increase seen in patients with the lowest initial cyclosporinebioavailability. The tolerability was similar between the two formulations during this study.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A comparison of the oral bioavailability of cyclosporine from the original formulation (CsA) and from the new formulation, cyclosporine for microemulsion (CsA-ME), was made in pediatric maintenance liver transplant patients within two age groups (group 1, ages 1-5 years; group 2, ages 6-17 years) in an open-label, multicenter, randomized crossover trial. All patients were at least 6 months past transplantation and were receiving CsA maintenance therapy. METHODS: In study period 1 (days 1 through 14), patients were administered either CsA or CsA-ME at the same b.i.d. dosage as their maintenance therapy. Upon entry into period 2 (days 15 through 28), patients were converted to the alternate formulation at a 1:1 mg dose ratio. On day 29, all patients returned to the CsA treatment administered at study entry, with follow-up on day 35. Dosage adjustments were not allowed with either CsA or CsA-ME. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiling was performed at the end of periods 1 and 2. RESULTS: Both the mean area under the concentration-versus-time curve and the mean maximum blood concentration of cyclosporine-both normalized for dose-were significantly increased: by 66% and 109%, respectively, in patients receiving CsA-ME compared with those receiving CsA in group 1 and by 39% and 75%, respectively, in group 2. During this study, liver function remained stable, and serum creatinine and blood pressure did not differ significantly between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows increased bioavailability in all patients converted to CsA-ME, with the greatest increase seen in patients with the lowest initial cyclosporine bioavailability. The tolerability was similar between the two formulations during this study.
Authors: María del Mar Fernández De Gatta; Dolores Santos-Buelga; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; María José García Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2002 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Atholl Johnston; Philip Belitsky; Ulrich Frei; John Horvath; Peter Hoyer; J Harold Helderman; Michael Oellerich; Stephen Pollard; Hany Riad; Paolo Rigotti; Paul Keown; Björn Nashan Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-06-17 Impact factor: 2.953