Literature DB >> 9210278

Psychological factors in the longitudinal course of battering: when do the couples split up? When does the abuse decrease?

N S Jacobson1, J M Gottman, E Gortner, S Berns, J W Shortt.   

Abstract

The longitudinal course of battering was investigated over a 2-year time span. Forty-five batterers and their spouses were assessed with self-report, psychophysiological, and marital interaction measures. Both the stability of the relationship and of the battering were assessed. At the two-year follow-up, 62% of the couples were still married and living together, while 38% had separated or divorced. A combination of six variables, reflecting severity of husband emotional abuse, wife dissatisfaction, husband physiological arousal, and wife defending herself assertively, was 90.2% accurate in predicting separation or divorce 2 years later. Of the couples still living together at follow-up, 46% of the batterers did not reduce their levels of severe violence, while 54% did significantly decrease levels of violence. Husbands who continued to be severely violent at 2-year follow-up were more domineering, globally negative and emotionally abusive toward their wives at Time 1 than husbands who reduced their levels of violence. Even though 54% of the batterers decreased the frequency of violent acts over the 2-year period, only 7% achieved complete desistance. Moreover, husband emotional abuse did not decrease over the 2-year period, even when physical abuse did.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9210278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Vict        ISSN: 0886-6708


  14 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

2.  Women's strategic responses to violence in Nicaragua.

Authors:  M C Ellsberg; A Winkvist; R Peña; H Stenlund
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  The Hazards of Predicting Divorce Without Crossvalidation.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Amy M Smith Slep
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2001-05

4.  Examining the correlates of engagement and disengagement coping among help-seeking battered women.

Authors:  Casey T Taft; Patricia A Resick; Jillian Panuzio; Dawne S Vogt; Mindy B Mechanic
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2007

5.  Responses to and resources for intimate partner violence: qualitative findings from women, men, and service providers in rural Kenya.

Authors:  Merab Odero; Abigail M Hatcher; Chenoia Bryant; Maricianah Onono; Patrizia Romito; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Janet M Turan
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2013-11-18

6.  Intimate partner violence as a predictor of marital disruption in rural Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jennifer A Wagman; Blake Charvat; Marie E Thoma; Anthony Ndyanabo; Fred Nalugoda; Joseph Ssekasanvu; Grace Kigozi; David Serwadda; Joseph Kagaayi; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Emotional abuse in intimate relationships: the role of gender and age.

Authors:  Günnur Karakurt; Kristin E Silver
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2013

8.  The occurrence of female-to-male partner violence among male intimate partner violence offenders mandated to treatment: a brief research report.

Authors:  Cory A Crane; Samuel W Hawes; Dolores L Mandel; Caroline J Easton
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2014

9.  Men's Aggression Toward Women: A 10-Year Panel Study.

Authors:  Hyoun K Kim; Heidemarie K Laurent; Deborah M Capaldi; Alan Feingold
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2008-12

10.  Trajectories of physical and emotional marital aggression in midlife couples.

Authors:  Katrina A Vickerman; Gayla Margolin
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.