Literature DB >> 9210121

Acoustic cues to place of articulation and the McGurk effect: the role of release bursts, aspiration, and formant transitions.

K P Green1, L W Norrix.   

Abstract

The McGurk effect demonstrates that the perceived place of articulation of an auditory consonant (such as/bi/) can be influenced by the simultaneous presentation of a videotape of a talker saying a conflicting consonant such as /gi/. Usually, such a presentation is perceived by observers as "di" or "delta i" (known as fusion responses). The reverse pairing (auditory /gi/ paired with a visual /bi/) results in "bgi." percepts. These are known as combination responses. In the current study, three experiments examined how acoustic information about place of articulation contained within the release bursts, aspiration, and voiced formants and transitions of a consonant contribute to the McGurk effect. In the first experiment, the release bursts and aspiration were deleted from the acoustic signal. This manipulation resulted in a smaller impact on McGurk "fusion" tokens relative to the McGurk "combination" tokens. This asymmetry may be related to the perceptual salience of the release bursts and aspiration for velar compared to the bilabial tokens used in this experiment and their importance for obtaining the combination percept. In Experiment 2, the release bursts and aspiration were increased in amplitude. Results revealed either no effect or a stronger McGurk effect for the manipulated tokens than for the intact tokens. This findings suggests that the McGurk effect for fusion tokens does not occur simply because the release bursts and aspiration are weak. In Experiment 3, low-pass filtering the second and higher formants and transitions was associated with the largest overall impact on the McGurk effect. This suggests that dynamic information contained within these formants is of primary importance in obtaining the McGurk effect. These cues are, however, context-dependent and vary as a function of talker and vowel context.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9210121     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4003.646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  11 in total

1.  Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.

Authors:  Lawrence Brancazio; Catherine T Best; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Quantified acoustic-optical speech signal incongruity identifies cortical sites of audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jintao Jiang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Psychophysics of the McGurk and other audiovisual speech integration effects.

Authors:  Jintao Jiang; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The role of speech production system in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2010-07-08

6.  Comparison of McGurk Effect across Three Consonant-Vowel Combinations in Kannada.

Authors:  Dhatri S Devaraju; Ajith Kumar U; Santosh Maruthy
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-12-07

7.  What is the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-10

8.  Distinct cortical locations for integration of audiovisual speech and the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Laura C Erickson; Brandon A Zielinski; Jennifer E V Zielinski; Guoying Liu; Peter E Turkeltaub; Amber M Leaver; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

9.  Skilled musicians are not subject to the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Gemma Massetti; Ezia Rizzi; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.