Literature DB >> 9209954

Prevalence and clinical significance of combined K-ras mutation and p53 aberration in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

S T Dergham1, M C Dugan, R Kucway, W Du, D S Kamarauskiene, V K Vaitkevicius, J D Crissman, F H Sarkar.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: This study could not attribute survival differences to the coincident acquisition of two common genetic alterations, K-ras mutation and p53 overexpression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Additionally, our data indicate the converse to be true: Those patients lacking both K-ras mutation and aberrant p53 expression showed the shortest survival when compared with cases showing either alteration or both. This study also showed the negative effect of K-ras mutation and p53 expression on pancreas cancer patients' survival after treatment with either radiation therapy or chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Mutations of the oncogene K-ras at codon 12 are reported to be the most common genetic alteration in pancreatic carcinoma, whereas either overexpression or mutation of the tumor suppressor p53 gene is considered the most common genetic alteration in neoplasia of all types. p53 overexpression has been attributed to survival differences in pancreatic carcinoma, but such association is still controversial. No studies have fully documented the combined incidence of K-ras and p53 alterations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, or their combined effect on patient survival in a large case series. The influence of radiation or chemotherapy in groups showing both, either, or neither mutation is also undocumented.
METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 76 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were cut for DNA extraction for K-ras analysis and immunohistochemical staining for aberrant p53 expression. K-ras mutation was determined by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and slot-blot allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridization of PCR-amplified DNA product p53 expression was scored on the basis of percent nuclear staining with the MAb DO7.
RESULTS: Sixty-four of 76 cases (84%) showed K-ras mutation, p53 expression, or both, K-ras was mutated in 55 of 76 cases (72%). p53 was expressed in 33 of 76 cases (43%). Twenty-four of 76 cases (31%) showed both K-ras mutation and p53 expression. The presence of both alterations was not related to significant differences in tumor grade, stage, or survival compared to either alteration alone. A sizable subset (16% of cases) lacked either alteration, and surprisingly, this group showed the shortest median survival compared to those with K-ras mutation, p53 expression, or both (p = 0.024). Patients whose tumors were K-ras-negative showed the greatest difference in median survival with radiation therapy (median survival 30.8 mo vs 7.8 mo with no radiation, p = 0.005).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9209954     DOI: 10.1007/bf02822384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pancreatol        ISSN: 0169-4197


  25 in total

Review 1.  K-ras mutation and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C Caldas; S E Kern
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1995-08

2.  Activation of Raf by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  U Kasid; S Suy; P Dent; S Ray; T L Whiteside; T W Sturgill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Importance of pathologic staging in the surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas.

Authors:  A S Hermreck; C Y Thomas; S R Friesen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Correlation between p53 immunostaining patterns and gene sequence mutations in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D W Visscher; F H Sarkar; R K Shimoyama; J D Crissman
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  1996-09

5.  p53 mutations in pancreatic carcinoma and evidence of common involvement of homocopolymer tracts in DNA microdeletions.

Authors:  M S Redston; C Caldas; A B Seymour; R H Hruban; L da Costa; C J Yeo; S E Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Frequent c-Ki-ras oncogene activation in mucous cell hyperplasias of pancreas suffering from chronic inflammation.

Authors:  A Yanagisawa; K Ohtake; K Ohashi; M Hori; T Kitagawa; H Sugano; Y Kato
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 expression in human pancreatic carcinomas.

Authors:  S Y Zhang; B Ruggeri; P Agarwal; A F Sorling; T Obara; H Ura; M Namiki; A J Klein-Szanto
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Cancer statistics, 1996.

Authors:  S L Parker; T Tong; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  K-ras and p53 gene mutations in pancreatic cancer: ductal and nonductal tumors progress through different genetic lesions.

Authors:  N S Pellegata; F Sessa; B Renault; M Bonato; B E Leone; E Solcia; G N Ranzani
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Association of p53 gene mutations with short survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Nakamori; K Yashima; Y Murakami; O Ishikawa; H Ohigashi; S Imaoka; S Yaegashi; Y Konishi; T Sekiya
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1995-02
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Boris Blechacz; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Expression of growth factor receptors, oncogenes and suppressor genes, and their relationship to pathological features, staging and survival.

Authors:  Antonio Lozano-Leon; Begona Vieites Perez-Quintela; Julio Iglesias-García; Jose Lariño-Noia; Evaristo Varo; Jeronimo Forteza; J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Clinical significance of K-ras and c-erbB-2 mutations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Renata Talar-Wojnarowska; Anita Gasiorowska; Beata Smolarz; Hanna Romanowicz-Makowska; Janusz Strzelczyk; Adam Janiak; Andrzej Kulig; Ewa Malecka-Panas
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

4.  The molecular targets for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alexios S Strimpakos; Kostas N Syrigos; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  The Significance of p53 and K-ras Immunocytochemical Staining in the Diagnosis of Malignant Biliary Obstruction by Brush Cytology during ERCP.

Authors:  Young Sup Kim; Ho Gak Kim; Jimin Han; Change Jae Hur; Byeong Suk Kim; Jin Tae Jung; Joong Goo Kwon; Eun Young Kim; Chang-Ho Cho; Yoon Kyung Sohn
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Prognostic factors in resectable pancreatic cancer: p53 and bcl-2.

Authors:  R J Bold; K R Hess; A S Pearson; A M Grau; F A Sinicrope; M Jennings; D J McConkey; C D Bucana; K R Cleary; P A Hallin; P J Chiao; J L Abbruzzese; D B Evans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Ras in cancer and developmental diseases.

Authors:  Alberto Fernández-Medarde; Eugenio Santos
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2011-03

8.  Clinical significance of p16 protein expression loss and aberrant p53 protein expression in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Joon Jeong; Young Nyun Park; Joon Seong Park; Dong-Sup Yoon; Hoon Sang Chi; Byong Ro Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  TLN-4601 suppresses growth and induces apoptosis of pancreatic carcinoma cells through inhibition of Ras-ERK MAPK signaling.

Authors:  Paul M Campbell; Nadia Boufaied; James J Fiordalisi; Adrienne D Cox; Pierre Falardeau; Channing J Der; Henriette Gourdeau
Journal:  J Mol Signal       Date:  2010-11-02

Review 10.  K-Ras mutation detection in liquid biopsy and tumor tissue as prognostic biomarker in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Li; Yuanting Zheng; Hong Sun; Rongyuan Zhuang; Jing Liu; Tianshu Liu; Weimin Cai
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.