PURPOSE: The Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) has established useful criteria for the diagnosis of polycythemia vera. In some circumstances, an increase of plasma volume (PV) masks that of red cell mass (RCM), with hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht) remaining normal. This defines the concept of inapparent polycythemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients seen in the hematology unit with the diagnosis of polycythemia vera were studied. There were 55 males and 48 females with a median age of 59 years. Ninety-five patients fulfilled the PVSG criteria. Spontaneous erythroid colonies and low serum erythropoietin level confirmed the diagnosis in the 8 other cases. Patients were classified according to Hb and Ht level. RESULTS: Group A consisted of 85 patients with increased Hb and Ht defined, respectively, by Hb > 18 g/dl, Ht > 0.52 in males and Hb > 16 g/dL, Ht>0.47 in females. Group B included 18 patients (17%) with inapparent polycythemia vera (IPV) defined by a normal Hb and Ht value at diagnosis. In this group, the reasons to perform RCM were as follows: splenomegaly associated with increased platelets and/or leucocytes counts (n = 8), portal vein thrombosis (n = 5), increased platelets or leucocytes counts without splenomegaly (n = 3), and isolated splenomegaly (n = 2). The two groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, leucocyte, serum iron, and platelet level. Hemoglobin and Ht levels were significantly different between the two groups. The difference between the PV was indeed highly significant. The mean PV increase was + 9.5% (nL < +20%) in group A versus + 36.3% in group B (P < 0.00005). Red cell mass was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased Hb or Ht should constitute the sole criteria for RCM determination. In the context of portal vein thrombosis, isolated hyperleucocytosis, thrombocytosis, or splenomegaly, a RCM should be performed. The frequency of IPV remains to be specified but the diagnosis of polycythemia vera is probably underestimated.
PURPOSE: The Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) has established useful criteria for the diagnosis of polycythemia vera. In some circumstances, an increase of plasma volume (PV) masks that of red cell mass (RCM), with hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht) remaining normal. This defines the concept of inapparent polycythemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients seen in the hematology unit with the diagnosis of polycythemia vera were studied. There were 55 males and 48 females with a median age of 59 years. Ninety-five patients fulfilled the PVSG criteria. Spontaneous erythroid colonies and low serum erythropoietin level confirmed the diagnosis in the 8 other cases. Patients were classified according to Hb and Ht level. RESULTS: Group A consisted of 85 patients with increased Hb and Ht defined, respectively, by Hb > 18 g/dl, Ht > 0.52 in males and Hb > 16 g/dL, Ht>0.47 in females. Group B included 18 patients (17%) with inapparent polycythemia vera (IPV) defined by a normal Hb and Ht value at diagnosis. In this group, the reasons to perform RCM were as follows: splenomegaly associated with increased platelets and/or leucocytes counts (n = 8), portal vein thrombosis (n = 5), increased platelets or leucocytes counts without splenomegaly (n = 3), and isolated splenomegaly (n = 2). The two groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, leucocyte, serum iron, and platelet level. Hemoglobin and Ht levels were significantly different between the two groups. The difference between the PV was indeed highly significant. The mean PV increase was + 9.5% (nL < +20%) in group A versus + 36.3% in group B (P < 0.00005). Red cell mass was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased Hb or Ht should constitute the sole criteria for RCM determination. In the context of portal vein thrombosis, isolated hyperleucocytosis, thrombocytosis, or splenomegaly, a RCM should be performed. The frequency of IPV remains to be specified but the diagnosis of polycythemia vera is probably underestimated.
Authors: Jerry L Spivak; Michael Considine; Donna M Williams; Conover C Talbot; Ophelia Rogers; Alison R Moliterno; Chunfa Jie; Michael F Ochs Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesca R Ponziani; Maria A Zocco; Chiara Campanale; Emanuele Rinninella; Annalisa Tortora; Luca Di Maurizio; Giuseppe Bombardieri; Raimondo De Cristofaro; Anna M De Gaetano; Raffaele Landolfi; Antonio Gasbarrini Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 5.742