Literature DB >> 9207678

Aesthetic outcome of breast implant removal in 85 consecutive patients.

D T Netscher1, S Sharma, J Thornby, M Peltier, A Lyos, M Fater, A Mosharrafa.   

Abstract

As we began to see increasing numbers of women concerned about their gel-filled breast implants, we became aware that we could not advise them with any degree of confidence what they might expect in terms of aesthetic result after implant removal. We decided to review the records and outcomes over a 2-year period of a number of patients who underwent implant removal. Eighty-five consecutive patients were reviewed, 69 of whom had undergone cosmetic augmentation and 16 of whom had breast reconstruction with silicone gel implant(s). Thirty-nine of the 69 cosmetic augmentation patients had removal of implants alone, and 27 had removal accompanied by mastopexy. Three had reaugmentation with saline-filled implants; one had replacement with saline-filled implants. Fifteen of the 16 reconstruction patients underwent autogenous tissue transfer. Preoperative and postoperative photographs of all patients were mixed randomly and rated by two independent raters in four aesthetic categories on a five-point scoring system. Repeatability was measured several weeks later, when each rater scored randomly selected photographs from this patient pool. The patients also performed their own outcome evaluations by means of questionnaire. We discovered that cosmetic augmentation patients who undergo implant removal only often suffer adverse aesthetic results. The postremoval appearance of many cosmetic augmentation patients actually will be improved over their preoperative appearance when mastopexy is performed in conjunction with implant removal. The study demonstrated that patients with certain body types could expect a particular outcome; i.e., women with asthenic builds and older patients with lax, striated breast skin generally had unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes with implant removal only. Patients selected for autogenous breast reconstruction had favorable results, with extended latissimus dorsi and TRAM flaps yielding equally good outcomes. The study allows us to offer patients an optimistic view of postoperative results following breast implant removal. We have begun to advise selected patients that implant removal accompanied by mastopexy provides a more pleasing aesthetic outcome than implant removal alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9207678     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199707000-00032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Implant Replacement or Removal: What Happens after Capsular Contracture? A German Study Examining Breast Implant Revision Surgery and Patient Choices in 946 Cases.

Authors:  Shafreena Kühn; Mara Anna Georgijewitsch; Andrej Wehle; Moritz Billner; Lara Küenzlen; Jens Rothenberger; Ulrich Michael Rieger
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.268

2.  Dual pedicle mastopexy technique for reorientation of volume and shape after subglandular and submuscular breast implant removal.

Authors:  Raffi Gurunluoglu; Edward Kubek; Jamie Arton
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-09-16

3.  Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction postmastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Tim Goodacre; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Use of autologous fat grafting in reconstruction following mastectomy and breast conserving surgery: An updated systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Mimi R Borrelli; Naeem Dowlut; Mohsin F Butt; Sam Freeman; Ter-Er Orkar; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2017-08-24

5.  Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in DIEAP Flap versus Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rossella Sgarzani; Luca Negosanti; Paolo Giovanni Morselli; Veronica Vietti Michelina; Luigi Maria Lapalorcia; Riccardo Cipriani
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.