OBJECTIVES: This study prospectively compared the incremental prognostic benefit of exercise echocardiography with that of exercise testing in a large cohort. BACKGROUND: Exercise echocardiography is widely accepted as a diagnostic tool, but the prognostic information provided by this test, incremental to clinical and stress testing evaluation, is ill-defined. METHODS: Clinical, exercise and echocardiographic variables were studied in a consecutive group of 500 patients undergoing exercise echocardiography. After exclusion of patients who underwent revascularization within 3 months of the stress test (n = 16, 3%) and those lost to follow-up (n = 21, 4%), the remaining 463 patients (mean [+/-SD] age 57 +/- 12 years, 302 men) were followed-up for 44 +/- 11 months. Outcome was related to the exercise and echocardiographic findings, and the incremental prognostic benefit of exercise echocardiography was compared with that of standard exercise testing. RESULTS: Cardiac events occurred in 81 patients (17%), including 33 (7%) with spontaneous events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and unstable angina) and 48 with late revascularizations due to progressive symptoms. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, the likelihood of any cardiac event was increased in the presence of ischemia (relative risk [RR] 5.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.09 to 8.29, p < 0.001) and lessened by more maximal stress, measured as percent age-predicted maximal heart rate (RR per 5% increment 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92, p < 0.001). Spontaneous events were more strongly predicted by ischemia (RR 8.20, 95% CI 3.41 to 19.71, p < 0.001) and percent age-predicted maximal heart rate (RR per 5% increment 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.91, p < 0.001). An interactive logistic regression model showed that the addition of echocardiographic to exercise and clinical data offered incremental predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of ischemia on the exercise echocardiogram can predict whether patients will experience an event. This relation is independent of, and incremental to, clinical and exercise data.
OBJECTIVES: This study prospectively compared the incremental prognostic benefit of exercise echocardiography with that of exercise testing in a large cohort. BACKGROUND: Exercise echocardiography is widely accepted as a diagnostic tool, but the prognostic information provided by this test, incremental to clinical and stress testing evaluation, is ill-defined. METHODS: Clinical, exercise and echocardiographic variables were studied in a consecutive group of 500 patients undergoing exercise echocardiography. After exclusion of patients who underwent revascularization within 3 months of the stress test (n = 16, 3%) and those lost to follow-up (n = 21, 4%), the remaining 463 patients (mean [+/-SD] age 57 +/- 12 years, 302 men) were followed-up for 44 +/- 11 months. Outcome was related to the exercise and echocardiographic findings, and the incremental prognostic benefit of exercise echocardiography was compared with that of standard exercise testing. RESULTS: Cardiac events occurred in 81 patients (17%), including 33 (7%) with spontaneous events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and unstable angina) and 48 with late revascularizations due to progressive symptoms. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, the likelihood of any cardiac event was increased in the presence of ischemia (relative risk [RR] 5.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.09 to 8.29, p < 0.001) and lessened by more maximal stress, measured as percent age-predicted maximal heart rate (RR per 5% increment 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92, p < 0.001). Spontaneous events were more strongly predicted by ischemia (RR 8.20, 95% CI 3.41 to 19.71, p < 0.001) and percent age-predicted maximal heart rate (RR per 5% increment 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.91, p < 0.001). An interactive logistic regression model showed that the addition of echocardiographic to exercise and clinical data offered incremental predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of ischemia on the exercise echocardiogram can predict whether patients will experience an event. This relation is independent of, and incremental to, clinical and exercise data.
Authors: Melissa A Daubert; Joseph Sivak; Allison Dunning; Pamela S Douglas; Brian Coyne; Tracy Y Wang; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Angela Lowenstern; Karen P Alexander; C Larry Hill; Brooke Alhanti; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael G Nanna; Rajendra H Mehta; Lawton S Cooper; Renee P Bullock-Palmer; Udo Hoffmann; Pamela S Douglas Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Sorin Giusca; Sebastian Kelle; Eike Nagel; Sebastian Johannes Buss; Valentina Puntmann; Ernst Wellnhofer; Eckart Fleck; Hugo Albert Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joselina L M Oliveira; José A S Barreto-Filho; Carla R P Oliveira; Thaiana A Santana; Fernando D Anjos-Andrade; Erica O Alves; Adão C Nascimento-Junior; Thiago J S Góes; Nathalie O Santana; Francis L Vasconcelos; Martha A Barreto; Argemiro D'Oliveira Junior; Roberto Salvatori; Manuel H Aguiar-Oliveira; Antônio C S Sousa Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Carlos Cotrim; Isabel João; Paula Fazendas; Ana R Almeida; Luís Lopes; Bruno Stuart; Inês Cruz; Daniel Caldeira; Maria José Loureiro; Gonçalo Morgado; Hélder Pereira Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 2.062