| Literature DB >> 9206472 |
F M Spear1, D M Mathews, V G Kokich.
Abstract
Orthodontists treat many patients who are missing maxillary lateral incisors and/or mandibular second premolars. In the past, if the canines could not be substituted for lateral incisors, conventional full-coverage bridges were the common restoration. Recently, resin-bonded Maryland bridges became a popular substitute for conventional bridges to avoid crowns on the nonrestored abutments. However, resin-bonded bridges have a poor long-term prognosis for retention, lasting on average about 10 years. Since implants were introduced into dentistry by Swedish researchers in the mid-1980s, they have become a promising substitute for conventional or resin-bonded bridges. However, to successfully place and restore single-tooth implants in young orthodontic patients several questions must be answered. This article will discuss the many interdisciplinary issues that are involved in placing and restoring single-tooth implants in orthodontic patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9206472 DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(97)80039-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Orthod ISSN: 1073-8746 Impact factor: 0.970