Literature DB >> 9205819

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of bioavailability for two prodrugs of methylprednisolone.

P T Daley-Yates1, A J Gregory, C D Brooks.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to establish whether pharmacokinetic differences between two pro-drugs of methylprednisolone (MP) are likely to be of clinical significance.
METHODS: This study was a single-blind, randomized, crossover design comparing the bioequivalence of MP released from the pro-drugs Promedrol (MP suleptanate) and Solu-Medrol (MP succinate) after a single 250 mg (MP equivalent) intramuscular injection to 20 healthy male volunteers. Bioequivalence was assessed by conventional pharmacokinetic analysis, by measuring pharmacodynamic responses plus a novel approach using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling. The main measure of pharmacodynamic response was whole blood histamine (WBH), a measure of basophil numbers.
RESULTS: The MP Cmax was less for MP suleptanate due to a longer absorption halflife of the prodrug from the intramuscular injection site. The bioavailability of MP was equivalent when based on AUC with a MP suleptanate median 108% of the MP succinate value (90% CI: 102-114%). For Cmax the MP suleptanate median was 81% of the MP succinate value (90% CI: 75-88%). The tmax for MP from MP suleptanate was delayed relative to MP succinate. The median difference was 200% (90% non-parametric CI: 141-283%). The area under the WBH effect-time curve (AUEC) and the maximum response (Emax) were found to be equivalent (90% CI: 98-113% and 93-109% respectively). The maximum changes in other white blood cell counts, blood glucose concentration and the parameters of the pharmacodynamic sigmoid Emax model (EC50, Emax and gamma) were also not significantly different between prodrugs.
CONCLUSIONS: MP suleptanate is an acceptable pharmaceutical alternative to MP succinate. The use of both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response data together gives greater confidence in the conclusions compared with those based only on conventional pharmacokinetic bioequivalence analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9205819      PMCID: PMC2042793          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00598.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  4 in total

1.  Modeling receptor/gene-mediated effects of corticosteroids on hepatic tyrosine aminotransferase dynamics in rats: dual regulation by endogenous and exogenous corticosteroids.

Authors:  Anasuya Hazra; Nancy Pyszczynski; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone after intravenous and intramuscular administration in rats.

Authors:  Anasuya Hazra; Nancy Pyszczynski; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.627

3.  Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Methylprednisolone in Neonates Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Christoph P Hornik; Daniel Gonzalez; Julie Dumond; Huali Wu; Eric M Graham; Kevin D Hill; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-23

4.  Description of a Novel Mechanism Possibly Explaining the Antiproliferative Properties of Glucocorticoids in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Fibroblasts Based on Glucocorticoid Receptor GR and NFAT5.

Authors:  Sandrine Herbelet; Boel De Paepe; Jan L De Bleecker
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.