Literature DB >> 9202989

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using surgically retrieved epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in cases of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia.

I Fahmy1, R Mansour, M Aboulghar, G Serour, A Kamal, N A Tawab, A M Ramzy, Y Amin.   

Abstract

This was a retrospective study of 115 patients who underwent 124 cycles of ICSI using surgically retrieved spermatozoa. The objective was to compare the results of ICSI in patients with obstructive azoospermia using epididymal spermatozoa (36 cycles) or testicular spermatozoa (58 cycles) with ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia using testicular spermatozoa (30 cycles). When epididymal spermatozoa were used for ICSI, the fertilization rate per injected metaphase-II oocyte and the clinical pregnancy rate per ICSI cycle were 60.4 and 25%, respectively. When testicular spermatozoa were used in obstructive cases, the fertilization rate and pregnancy rate were 57.9 and 34.5%. In non-obstructive cases the fertilization and pregnancy rates were 41.2 and 16.6%. When patients with obstructive azoospermia were regrouped according to the cause of obstruction, the fertilization and pregnancy rates were 59.1 and 35.1% in acquired obstruction and 58.7 and 24.3% in congenital obstruction. The fertilization and pregnancy rates were not statistically different (p > 0.05) when testicular or epididymal spermatozoa were used in obstructive cases; neither was statistically different (p > 0.05) when compared in patients with congenital and acquired obstruction. On the other hand, the fertilization and pregnancy rates in cases with non-obstructive azoospermia were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than in obstructive cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9202989     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.00103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  4 in total

1.  Fresh MESA improved embryo fertilization, cleavage, blastula formation and implantation rates after failed TESA in couples with obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; Elisheva M Rovner; Eric Gonzalez; David Weiner
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in azoospermic men who underwent testicular sperm extraction vs. microdissection testicular sperm extraction: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Serajoddin Vahidi; Nima Narimani; Saeid Abouei; Ali Sadeghi; Keivan Lorian; Amirhossein Rahavian
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-10-10

Review 3.  Reproductive Chances of Men with Azoospermia Due to Spermatogenic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Caroline Kang; Nahid Punjani; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Azoospermia: vasal agenesis.

Authors:  J Sam Fisher; Edward D Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.