Literature DB >> 9202934

Monitoring depth of anaesthesia.

G Schneider1, P S Sebel.   

Abstract

In clinical practice, indirect and non-specific signs are used for monitoring anaesthetic adequacy. These include haemodynamic, respiratory, muscular and autonomic signs. These measures do not indicate adequacy of anaesthesia in a reliable manner. Many attempts have been made to find a more accurate monitor. Direct monitoring of anaesthetic effect should be possible by EEG measurement. EEG information can be reduced, condensed and simplified, leading to single numbers (spectral edge frequency and median frequency). These methods appear insufficient for assessing anaesthetic adequacy. The bispectral index, derived from bispectral analysis of the EEG, is a very promising tool for measuring adequacy of anaesthesia. An alternative approach is to monitor evoked potentials. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials may be helpful in assessing anaesthetic adequacy. Both techniques need further validation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9202934     DOI: 10.1097/00003643-199705001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl        ISSN: 0952-1941


  10 in total

Review 1.  Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery.

Authors:  Leslie C Jameson; Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Automation of anaesthesia: a review on multivariable control.

Authors:  Jing Jing Chang; S Syafiie; Raja Kamil; Thiam Aun Lim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Depth of general anaesthesia monitors.

Authors:  D Devika Rani; Ss Harsoor
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bojan Musizza; Samo Ribaric
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Optimised anaesthesia to reduce post operative cognitive decline (POCD) in older patients undergoing elective surgery, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Clive Ballard; Emma Jones; Nathan Gauge; Dag Aarsland; Odd Bjarte Nilsen; Brian K Saxby; David Lowery; Anne Corbett; Keith Wesnes; Eirini Katsaiti; James Arden; Derek Amoako; Derek Amaoko; Nicholas Prophet; Balaji Purushothaman; David Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accidental subcutaneous remifentanil infusion as a cause of delayed awakening after craniotomy.

Authors:  Alexander Wolfson; Cephas Swamidoss
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-11-03

7.  A wavelet transform based method to determine depth of anesthesia to prevent awareness during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Seyed Mortaza Mousavi; Ahmet Adamoğlu; Tamer Demiralp; Mahrokh G Shayesteh
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 8.  Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review.

Authors:  M T W Verhoeven; M A Gerritzen; L J Hellebrekers; B Kemp
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Verification of the performance of the Bispectral Index as a hypnotic depth indicator during dexmedetomidine sedation.

Authors:  Seunghee Ki; Dongeon Lee; Wonjin Lee; Kwangrae Cho; Yongjae Han; Jeonghan Lee
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2021-10-14

10.  Cortical functional activity in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Yiming Wang; Fangxian Chai; Hongming Zhang; Xingde Liu; Pingxia Xie; Lei Zheng; Lixia Yang; Lingjiang Li; Deyu Fang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.630

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.