Literature DB >> 9202870

Is CAPD an effective treatment for ESRD patients with a weight over 80 kg?

I E Afthentopoulos1, D G Oreopoulos.   

Abstract

We studied the effectiveness of CAPD in large patients (> 80 kg) (group B, n = 49) by comparing them to a group of patients whose body weight was 60-80 kg (group A, n = 193). Patients in group B were two years younger (55.4 versus 57.7 years, p < 0.01), were predominantly male (M: F ratio 33/16 vs 84/109) and had slightly higher residual creatinine clearance (8 ml/min vs 6 ml/min) at the beginning of treatment. The prevalence of diabetes and the prevalence of comorbid conditions in the two groups were similar. The incidence of peritonitis was similar between the two groups. Patients with a large weight spent significantly fewer days in hospital (20.6 +/- 25 vs 23.4 +/- 35.0 days/year); reasons for hospitalization were similar, except for weakness/fatigue that was more frequent (10%) in group B than in group A (2%). The initial weekly dialysate volume was similar in the two groups (57 +/- 51 in group B and 56 +/- 101 in group A) and increased in both groups at the end of the study to 60 +/- 141 in group B and 61 +/- 171/week in group A. The weight of 6 patients in group B and 5 in group A decreased below the range of that group. On the contrary the weight of 28 patients in group A increased to the range of group B. Based on the final weight there were 166 patients whose weight was 60-80 kg, and 71 patients whose weight was over 80 kg (80-109 kg). Patient survival was similar between the two groups. There was a significantly higher death rate among those patients whose weight decreased in both groups compared to those whose weight increased or remained stable. We conclude that CAPD is an effective treatment in the management of ESRD patients with weights over 80 kg. There is a high mortality among patients whose weight decreases irrespective of their initial weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9202870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-0430            Impact factor:   0.975


  6 in total

1.  Possible factors contributing to similar peritoneal dialysis outcome in patients over 60 years of age and the younger ones.

Authors:  Alicja E Grzegorzewska; Magdalena Leander
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Peritoneal dialysis outcomes in a modern cohort of overweight patients.

Authors:  Shubha Ananthakrishnan; Nigar Sekercioglu; Rosilene M Elias; Joseph Kim; Dimitrios Oreopoulos; Maggie Chu; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Effect of body mass index on outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in India.

Authors:  Narayan Prasad; Archana Sinha; Amit Gupta; Raj Kumar Sharma; Dharmendra Bhadauria; Abhilash Chandra; Kashi Nath Prasad; Anupama Kaul
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Does body fat mass define survival in patients starting peritoneal dialysis?

Authors:  Soo Jeong Choi; Eun Jung Kim; Moo Yong Park; Jin Kuk Kim; Seung Duk Hwang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Frequency and microbiology of peritonitis and exit-site infection among obese peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Paul Komenda; Claudio Rigatto; Mauro Verrelli; Manish M Sood
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion by Nephrologist Using Minilaparotomy: Do Survival and Complications Vary in Obese?

Authors:  Pavitra Manu Dogra; Ranjith K Nair; Amit Katyal; G Shanmugraj; Ashok K Hooda; Anantharam Jairam; Satish Mendonca; Parikshit Singh Chauhan
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.