Literature DB >> 9202542

Enterostomal complications: are emergently created enterostomas at greater risk?

A Del Pino1, J R Cintron, C P Orsay, R K Pearl, A Tan, H Abcarian.   

Abstract

It is not unusual for surgeons to have to construct a enterostoma during an emergency abdominal operation. The enterostomal complications, often overlooked, can be serious for the patient. There are many factors relating to stoma complications. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the emergency status of an operation is an independent risk. Over a 19-year period from 1976 to 1995, there were 1758 enterostomas constructed at our institution. Fifty-nine per cent were for emergent situations, defined as any operation performed for peritonitis, obstructions, or massive hemorrhage. The data pertaining to complications was compiled by the enterostomal therapist and prospectively recorded into an institutional database. Complications were characterized as skin problems, parastomal problems (infection, separation), retraction, stenosis, necrosis, prolapse, and herniation. There were 624 (35%) patients with recorded complications. It was not uncommon for a patient to have more than one complication. There were 500 (55%) skin problems, 111 (12%) parastomal problems, 104 (11%) retractions, 33 (4%) stenoses, 112 (12%) necroses, 28 (3%) prolapses, and 19 (3%) enterostomas herniated. Overall, there were 1044 emergently created enterostomas, and we found that 356 (34%) patients had a complication. The most common indications for emergency laparotomies were abdominal gunshot wounds (40%), bowel obstruction (20%), bowel perforation other than by gunshot or stab wound (15%), and diverticulitis (8%). Among the nonemergently created enterostomas (714), there were 268 (37%) with complications (P = 0.015). Our findings suggest that emergently created enterostomas are not at greater risk for complications, except for the ileostomy. Although further analysis of this particular subset must be undertaken, the technical intricacies of an ileostomy, including preoperative marking of the site, might have an important role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9202542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Lars Tue Sørensen; Ulla Hemmingsen; Finn Kallehave; Peer Wille-Jørgensen; Johan Kjaergaard; Lisbeth Nørgaard Møller; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Ostomy function after abdominoperineal resection--a clinical and patient evaluation.

Authors:  E Angenete; A Correa-Marinez; J Heath; E González; A Wedin; M Prytz; D Asplund; E Haglind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583].

Authors:  Nuh N Rahbari; Phillip Knebel; Meinhard Kieser; Thomas Bruckner; Detlef K Bartsch; Helmut Friess; Andre L Mihaljevic; Josef Stern; Markus K Diener; Sabine Voss; Inga Rossion; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  An interesting case of bishop-koop stoma prolapse.

Authors:  Bilal Mirza
Journal:  APSP J Case Rep       Date:  2010-12-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.