Literature DB >> 9200808

Cardiorespiratory consequences to hobble restraint.

M Roeggla1, A Wagner, M Muellner, A Bur, H Roeggla, M M Hirschl, A N Laggner, G Roeggla.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Mechanical restraints in agitated, violent psychiatric patients are still sometimes in use in the initial phase of emergency treatment, especially when patients are taken to hospital by law enforcement. Sudden death has occurred in persons in hobble restraint. Cardiopulmonary response to prone or upright hobble restraint for three minutes was investigated in six male volunteers in randomised crossover trial.
RESULTS: No change was observed in the investigated cardiopulmonary parameters after hobble restraint in the upright position. After hobble restraint in the prone position, mean forced vital capacity decreased by 39.6%, mean forced exspiratory volume by 41%, mean end-tidal carbon dioxide increased by 14.7%, mean heart rate decreased by 21.3%, mean systolic blood pressure decreased by 32.3%, mean diastolic blood pressure decreased by 26.1% and mean cardiac output decreased by 37.4% (P for all reported changes < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Hobble restraint in the prone position leads to a dramatic impairment of hemodynamics and respiration. Upright position and frequent control of vital parameters are necessary to prevent a possibly fatal outcome in persons in hobble restraint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9200808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  6 in total

Review 1.  Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  E Sailas; M Fenton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Death by restraint.

Authors:  D Milliken
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Digital 3D reconstruction of two parahissian accessory bundles in a case of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Steffen; Michael Schaepman; Thomas Hardmeier; Wolf Schweitzer
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gisele Huf; Evandro S F Coutinho; Marco A V Ferreira; Silvana Ferreira; Flavia Mello; Clive E Adams
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Prone restraint cardiac arrest in in-custody and arrest-related deaths.

Authors:  Victor Weedn; Alon Steinberg; Pete Speth
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.717

Review 6.  Restraint physiology: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gary M Vilke
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.