Literature DB >> 9200582

Defining and evaluating quality for ambulatory care educational programs.

J L Bowen1, J A Stearns, C Dohner, J Blackman, D Simpson.   

Abstract

As the training of medical students and residents increasingly moves to ambulatory care settings, clerkship and program directors must find a way to use their limited resources to guide the development and evaluation of the quality of these ambulatory-based learning experiences. To evaluate quality, directors must first define, in operational and measurable terms, what is meant by the term "quality" as it is applied to ambulatory-based education. Using educational theories and the definition of quality used by health care systems, the authors propose an operational definition of quality for guiding the planning, implementation, and evaluation of ambulatory care educational programs. They assert that quality is achieved through the interaction of an optimal learning environment, defined educational goals and positive outcomes, participant satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. By describing the components of quality along with examples of measurable indicators, the authors provide a foundation for the evaluation and improvement of instructional innovations in ambulatory care education for the benefit of teachers, learners, and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9200582     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199706000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Teaching the teachers: national survey of faculty development in departments of medicine of U.S. teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Jeanne M Clark; Thomas K Houston; Ken Kolodner; William T Branch; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Pharmacy preceptors' views on the value and optimal frequency of quality assurance visits to advanced pharmacy practice experience sites.

Authors:  Nancy E Burgett; Vincent C Dennis; Shannan D Wideman; Alice E Kirkpatrick; Diana L Randall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  University of California Commission on the Future of Medical Education. July 1997. Final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

4.  Moving forward in GME reform: a 4 + 1 model of resident ambulatory training.

Authors:  Saima I Chaudhry; Sandy Balwan; Karen A Friedman; Suzanne Sunday; Basit Chaudhry; Deborah Dimisa; Alice Fornari
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Continuity clinic satisfaction and valuation in residency training.

Authors:  Stephen D Sisson; Romsai Boonyasai; Kimberly Baker-Genaw; Julie Silverstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Medical Students' and Residents' preferred site characteristics and preceptor behaviours for learning in the ambulatory setting: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Karen W Schultz; John Kirby; Dianne Delva; Marshall Godwin; Sarita Verma; Richard Birtwhistle; Chris Knapper; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.