OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of double elevator palsy is poorly understood. We assessed two patients with this condition using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the appearance of the extraocular muscles. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Radiology department of a university-affiliated hospital in London, Ont. PATIENTS: Two patients from a private ophthalmology practice who had undergone complete transpositions of the horizontal rectus muscles to treat hypotropia associated with double elevator palsy. INTERVENTION: MRI. A volume scanning technique was used to obtain maximum information about the muscles. OUTCOME MEASURE: Appearance of the extraocular muscles. RESULTS: In both patients MRI showed decreased volume of the superior rectus muscle on the affected side. The other rectus muscles were normal. This suggested either congenital hypoplasia or paresis of the involved superior rectus muscle. In addition, the full tendon transpositions of the medial and lateral recti did not appreciably change the middle and deep orbital pathways of the transposed horizontal rectus muscles. CONCLUSIONS: MRI may be a useful adjunct to saccadic velocity assessments in differentiating between primary inferior rectus restriction, primary superior rectus paresis and congenital supranuclear elevator deficiency.
OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of double elevator palsy is poorly understood. We assessed two patients with this condition using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the appearance of the extraocular muscles. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Radiology department of a university-affiliated hospital in London, Ont. PATIENTS: Two patients from a private ophthalmology practice who had undergone complete transpositions of the horizontal rectus muscles to treat hypotropia associated with double elevator palsy. INTERVENTION: MRI. A volume scanning technique was used to obtain maximum information about the muscles. OUTCOME MEASURE: Appearance of the extraocular muscles. RESULTS: In both patients MRI showed decreased volume of the superior rectus muscle on the affected side. The other rectus muscles were normal. This suggested either congenital hypoplasia or paresis of the involved superior rectus muscle. In addition, the full tendon transpositions of the medial and lateral recti did not appreciably change the middle and deep orbital pathways of the transposed horizontal rectus muscles. CONCLUSIONS: MRI may be a useful adjunct to saccadic velocity assessments in differentiating between primary inferior rectus restriction, primary superior rectus paresis and congenital supranuclear elevator deficiency.