Literature DB >> 9199619

Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section turnaround time. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 32868 frozen sections in 700 hospitals.

D A Novis1, R J Zarbo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the intraoperative turnaround time for performing a frozen section (FS) and to examine pathology practice variables that influence it.
DESIGN: Over a 4-month period in 1995, participants in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement program prospectively collected data on up to 30 FS procedures performed on elective inpatient surgical cases and completed questionnaires profiling their FS practice characteristics.
SETTING: Surgical pathology laboratories serving private and public hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred institutions located in North America (667), Australia (12), New Zealand (1), the United Kingdom (3), Hong Kong (1), Mexico (1), and Norway (1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 90% FS block completion time defined as the time interval, in minutes, within which the fastest 90% of all FS blocks were completed, measured from the time pathologists received FS specimens to the time they communicated FS results to the surgeon.
RESULTS: Participants submitted data on 32868 FS blocks. Ninety percent of FS procedures were completed within 20 minutes. Frozen section turnaround times exceeding 20 minutes, termed outlier turnaround times, were more likely to occur when more than one pathologist participated in the FS diagnosis, pathology residents and medical students participated in the FS procedure, the pathologist had to retrieve and review previous case material during the FS procedure, the pathologist simultaneously received additional specimens from other FS cases, the pathologist was unable to reach a final FS diagnosis, and when technical problems occurred during the FS procedure. Seventy percent of all participating hospitals completed 90% of their frozen sections within 20 minutes. The institutional 90% completion times were shorter for hospitals containing 300 or fewer occupied beds than for those containing more than 300 occupied beds.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that 90% of FS block turnaround times can be performed within 20 minutes, measured from the time that pathologists receive FS specimens to the time that pathologists return FS diagnoses to surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9199619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  30 in total

1.  Intra-operative frozen section consultation: concepts, applications and limitations.

Authors:  Hasnan Jaafar
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2006-01

2.  The Eastern Québec Telepathology Network: a three-year experience of clinical diagnostic services.

Authors:  Bernard Têtu; Émilie Perron; Said Louahlia; Guy Paré; Marie-Claude Trudel; Julien Meyer
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  Imaging or Fiber Probe-Based Approach? Assessing Different Methods to Detect Near Infrared Autofluorescence for Intraoperative Parathyroid Identification.

Authors:  Giju Thomas; Malcolm H Squires; Tyler Metcalf; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; John E Phay
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Innovative surgical guidance for label-free real-time parathyroid identification.

Authors:  Giju Thomas; Melanie A McWade; John Q Nguyen; Melinda E Sanders; James T Broome; Naira Baregamian; Carmen C Solórzano; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Suspicious Yersinia granulomatous enterocolitis mimicking appendicitis.

Authors:  Tom Richardson; Michael Jones; Youssaf Akhtar; James Pollard
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-10-14

6.  Magnetically Promoted Rapid Immunofluorescence Staining for Frozen Tissue Sections.

Authors:  Tatsuya Onishi; Sachiko Matsuda; Yuki Nakamura; Junko Kuramoto; Akinori Tsuruma; Satoshi Sakamoto; Shunichi Suzuki; Daiichiro Fuchimoto; Akira Onishi; Shinichi Chikaki; Miki Kaneko; Akihiro Kuwahata; Masaki Sekino; Hiroshi Yasuno; Naohiro Hanyu; Tomoko Kurita; Hiroyuki Takei; Takashi Sakatani; Kanae Taruno; Seigo Nakamura; Tetsu Hayashida; Hiromitsu Jinno; Moriaki Kusakabe; Hiroshi Handa; Kaori Kameyama; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Multiscale nonlinear microscopy and widefield white light imaging enables rapid histological imaging of surgical specimen margins.

Authors:  Michael G Giacomelli; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Lucas C Cahill; Hilde Vardeh; Liza M Quintana; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; Jeff Brooker; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Deformable Registration of Histological Cancer Margins to Gross Hyperspectral Images using Demons.

Authors:  Martin Halicek; James V Little; Xu Wang; Zhuo Georgia Chen; Mihir Patel; Christopher C Griffith; Mark W El-Deiry; Nabil F Saba; Amy Y Chen; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03-06

9.  Comparing intraoperative parathyroid identification based on surgeon experience versus near infrared autofluorescence detection - A surgeon-blinded multi-centric study.

Authors:  Giju Thomas; Carmen C Solórzano; Naira Baregamian; Emmanuel A Mannoh; Rekha Gautam; Rebecca T Irlmeier; Fei Ye; Jon A Nelson; Samuel E Long; Paul G Gauger; Alexa Magner; Tyler Metcalf; Lawrence A Shirley; John E Phay; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Single acquisition label-free histology-like imaging with dual-contrast photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Ecclestone; Deepak Dinakaran; Parsin Haji Reza
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.