F Monier-Gavelle1, J L Duband. 1. Institut Jacques Monod, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) et Université Paris 7-Denis Diderot, CNRS et Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75252 Paris, France.
Abstract
During embryonic development, cell migration and cell differentiation are associated with dynamic modulations both in time and space of the repertoire and function of adhesion receptors, but the nature of the mechanisms responsible for their coordinated occurrence remains to be elucidated. Thus, migrating neural crest cells adhere to fibronectin in an integrin-dependent manner while maintaining reduced N-cadherin-mediated intercellular contacts. In the present study we provide evidence that, in these cells, the control of N-cadherin may rely directly on the activity of integrins involved in the process of cell motion. Prevention of neural crest cell migration using RGD peptides or antibodies to fibronectin and to beta1 and beta3 integrins caused rapid N-cadherin-mediated cell clustering. Restoration of stable intercellular contacts resulted essentially from the recruitment of an intracellular pool of N-cadherin molecules that accumulated into adherens junctions in tight association with the cytoskeleton and not from the redistribution of a preexisting pool of surface N-cadherin molecules. In addition, agents that cause elevation of intracellular Ca2+ after entry across the plasma membrane were potent inhibitors of cell aggregation and reduced the N-cadherin- mediated junctions in the cells. Finally, elevated serine/ threonine phosphorylation of catenins associated with N-cadherin accompanied the restoration of intercellular contacts. These results indicate that, in migrating neural crest cells, beta1 and beta3 integrins are at the origin of a cascade of signaling events that involve transmembrane Ca2+ fluxes, followed by activation of phosphatases and kinases, and that ultimately control the surface distribution and activity of N-cadherin. Such a direct coupling between adhesion receptors by means of intracellular signals may be significant for the coordinated interplay between cell-cell and cell-substratum adhesion that occurs during embryonic development, in wound healing, and during tumor invasion and metastasis.
During embryonic development, cell migration and cell differentiation are associated with dynamic modulations both in time and space of the repertoire and function of adhesion receptors, but the nature of the mechanisms responsible for their coordinated occurrence remains to be elucidated. Thus, migrating neural crest cells adhere to fibronectin in an integrin-dependent manner while maintaining reduced N-cadherin-mediated intercellular contacts. In the present study we provide evidence that, in these cells, the control of N-cadherin may rely directly on the activity of integrins involved in the process of cell motion. Prevention of neural crest cell migration using RGD peptides or antibodies to fibronectin and to beta1 and beta3 integrins caused rapid N-cadherin-mediated cell clustering. Restoration of stable intercellular contacts resulted essentially from the recruitment of an intracellular pool of N-cadherin molecules that accumulated into adherens junctions in tight association with the cytoskeleton and not from the redistribution of a preexisting pool of surface N-cadherin molecules. In addition, agents that cause elevation of intracellular Ca2+ after entry across the plasma membrane were potent inhibitors of cell aggregation and reduced the N-cadherin- mediated junctions in the cells. Finally, elevated serine/ threonine phosphorylation of catenins associated with N-cadherin accompanied the restoration of intercellular contacts. These results indicate that, in migrating neural crest cells, beta1 and beta3 integrins are at the origin of a cascade of signaling events that involve transmembrane Ca2+ fluxes, followed by activation of phosphatases and kinases, and that ultimately control the surface distribution and activity of N-cadherin. Such a direct coupling between adhesion receptors by means of intracellular signals may be significant for the coordinated interplay between cell-cell and cell-substratum adhesion that occurs during embryonic development, in wound healing, and during tumor invasion and metastasis.
Cadherins are integral membrane receptors that
mediate Ca2+-dependent cell–cell adhesion among
most, if not all, tissues (for reviews see 31, 96). At
the cellular level, cadherins are primarily concentrated in
the adherens junctions where they are connected with the
actin cytoskeleton. In these junctions, cadherin molecules
interact through their cytoplasmic domains with cytoskeleton-
associated proteins, namely α-, β-, and γ-catenins, α-actinin, and p120
as, and this association is essential for their
cell-binding function (for reviews see 33, 62).Although they form complex multimolecular structures,
adherens junctions are highly dynamic and can be repeatedly and rapidly assembled and disassembled. In particular, during embryonic development and tumor progression, groups of cells are constantly remodeled so that
neighboring cells that are initially in tight contact become
separated, disperse into adjacent tissues, and ultimately
reassociate with other cell types in different locations of
the organism. A large number of data has been accumulated recently about the possible mechanisms involved in
the down-regulation of cell–cell associations in tumor cells
allowing their dissemination throughout the body (see for
review 95). In a variety of infiltrating humancancers,
E-cadherin was found to be either absent or at least in significantly reduced amounts (e.g., see 30, 103). Consistent
with this finding, noninvasive transformed cells in vitro become invasive upon abolishing E-cadherin function or expression by antibodies or by introduction of E-cadherin
antisense RNA (4, 106). Conversely, transfection of highly
invasive epithelial tumor cell lines by E-cadherin cDNA
totally abrogates their invasiveness potential (106). A number of tumors, however, can disaggregate and metastasize
despite an abundant expression of cadherin molecules on
the cells' surface. In these cases, several mechanisms have
been proposed that would account for the suppression of
cadherin activity (48, 64, 89, 107). In particular, elevated
levels of tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin, p120
as,
and, to a lesser extent, of cadherins are believed to cause
unstable cell–cell adhesion in invasive cancer cell lines or
in cultured cells transformed with a v-src gene (5, 35, 49,
65, 92, 108, 109). However, this assumption has been challenged recently in a study revealing that phosphorylation
of β-catenin is dispensable for diminishing cadherin-mediated cell–cell associations in src-transformed cells (93).In contrast with tumor cells, relatively little is known
about the mechanisms involved in the regulation of cadherin-based cellular interactions during embryonic development. Because of their spectacular migration throughout the embryo, accompanied by sequential modulations
in their intercellular cohesion, neural crest cells provide a
powerful paradigm for exploring these mechanisms (see
for reviews 12, 26, 28, 56, 75). Thus, various in vivo studies
clearly established an inverse correlation between the expression of N-cadherin and the migratory behavior of neural crest cells, suggesting a precisely regulated, negative
control of the expression and function of N-cadherin molecules during migration (2, 13, 23, 37, 73). Under in vitro
conditions, consistent with the in vivo situation, neural
crest cells do not establish extensive and stable intercellular contacts during migration. However, they express intact
N-cadherin molecules on their surface but, contrasting with
nonmotile cells, the bulk of these molecules are excluded
from the regions of cell–cell contacts (71). In addition, inhibition of serine-threonine kinases, tyrosine kinases, and
phosphotyrosine phosphatases by specific inhibitors restored tight cell–cell cohesion among cells accompanied by
N-cadherin accumulation to the regions of intercellular
contacts, suggesting that N-cadherin–mediated interactions
in migrating neural crest cells are under the control of a
complex cascade of intracellular signals involving kinases
and phosphatases and presumably elicited by surface receptors (71).Receptors for growth factors have been proposed to
control E-cadherin activity in various epithelial cell lines,
such as MDCK, carcinoma, and mammary cells. In particular, the EGF receptor has been identified among the
proteins associated with E-cadherin and catenins, and
binding to its ligand provokes immediate tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin followed by rapid deterioration
of adherens junctions (45). Conversely, expression of Wnt-1,
a gene encoding a putative growth factor, results in enhancement of β-catenin and E-cadherin expression accompanied by increased stability of the catenin–cadherin
complex and greater cell adhesion (42). In migrating neural crest cells, the nature of the cell surface receptors eliciting the cascade of intracellular signals that would regulate
N-cadherin–based junctions is not known yet. Interestingly, at the end of migration, as cells aggregate into peripheral ganglia, N-cadherin is reexpressed on their surface coincidently with the disappearance of fibronectin (2,
13, 23, 37, 73, 99), suggesting that, locally, the lack of an
appropriate substratum for migration could provoke N-cadherin–mediated aggregation of neural crest cells. As integrins have been shown to constitute the major receptors
for extracellular matrix molecules involved in neural crest
cell migration (11, 20, 21, 53), this raises the intriguing possibility that they might be part of the regulatory mechanism
of N-cadherin activity in neural crest cells. In the present
study we demonstrate in vitro that blocking neural crest cell
migration by agents that interfere with fibronectin-to-integrin
interactions causes rapid N-cadherin–mediated cell–cell
aggregation. This aggregation process is mediated by a cytoplasmic pool of N-cadherin molecules recruited to the
membrane and incorporated into adherens junctions in association with cytoskeletal elements. We also found that
the control of cadherin function in neural crest cells is via
transmembrane Ca2+ fluxes possibly mediated by voltage-independent Ca2+ channels activated by integrins involved
in cell migration. Finally, we provide evidence that phosphorylation of β- and γ-catenins and of a 180-kD protein is
increased most likely on serine and threonine residues in
aggregated neural crest cells. Our data are therefore in favor
of the existence of cross talk mechanisms between cell–cell
and cell–substratum adhesion systems responsible for their
coordinated activity in migrating cells.
Materials and Methods
Adhesive Proteins and Antibodies
Bovine and human plasma fibronectin and Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser (RGDS)
peptides were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Gly-Arg-Asp-Gly-Ser (GRDGS) peptides were provided by Dr. K.M. Yamada (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Cyclic Gly-Pen-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro-Cys-Ala (GPenGRGDSPCA) peptides were purchased from GIBCO BRL (Gaithersburg, MD). The mAb 333 to humanfibronectin (3, 27), the polyclonal antibody (2992) directed against the
chicken β1 integrin subunit (17, 21), and the mAbs ES66-8 and ES46-8
also to the chicken β1 subunit (22, 24, 72) were kindly provided by Dr.
K.M. Yamada. The CSAT hybridoma (anti–chicken β1 integrin subunit;
44) was kindly donated by Dr. C. Buck (The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA). The mAb LM609 to the human αvβ3 integrin cross-reacting
with its avian counterpart (14, 20) was a gift of Dr. D.A. Cheresh (The
Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). The mAb HP2/1 to the human
α4 integrin chain (82) was kindly provided by Dr. F. Sanchez-Madrid
(Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain). The mAb B5G10 to the human
α4 chain (38) was kindly provided by Dr. M.E. Hemler (The Dana Farber
Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) or purchased from UBI (Euromedex,
France). Both antibodies were found to recognize the α4 integrin subunit
in a variety of species including quail (59). The mAb P1B5 to the human
α3 integrin subunit (111) was purchased from Becton Dickinson & Co.
(Mountain View, CA). Using both immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry, we could demonstrate that this antibody recognizes the avian
α3 integrin subunit. mAbs to chickenN-cadherin (mAb CC-11 and ID-7.2.3; 23, 110) were a kind gift of Dr B. Geiger (The Weizmann Institute,
Rehovot, Israel). The rat mAb NCD-2 to chickenN-cadherin (36) was
kindly donated by Dr. M. Takeichi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). A
rabbit antiserum directed against a peptide corresponding to the 24
COOH-terminal amino acids of chickenN-cadherin and the mAb PT-66
antiphosphotyrosine were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.
Metabolic Agents
Drugs that affect macromolecule synthesis and signal transduction pathways are listed on Table I. They were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Co., Biomol Research Laboratories (Tebu, France), or Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp. (La Jolla, CA). Agents of limited aqueous solubility were
prepared as stock solutions in a minimum volume of solvent, e.g., DMSO
or methanol, to reduce solvent concentration in assays below 0.1% (vol/
vol). Effects of solvents were evaluated in separate controls and were
found not to affect cell viability, spreading, and motility. Each agent was
tested for toxicity. Cell viability was assessed by cell morphology under an
inverted microscope and by videomicroscopy. As recommended by the
manufacturers, metabolic agents were generally used at concentrations
ranging from 1× to 100× the inhibition constants or the concentrations of
50% inhibition measured in vitro (values obtained generally from Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp. or Biomol Research Laboratories).
Table I
List of Metabolic Agents Used in the Present Study
Metabolic agent
Effect
Source
Solvent/stock
concentration
Concentration
range studied
References
Cycloheximide
Inhibits protein synthesis
Sigma
DMSO/10 mg/ml
0.01–10 μg/ml
/
Tunicamycin
Inhibits N-glycosylation
Sigma
Methanol/1 mg/ml
0.01–1 μg/ml
/
Brefeldin A
Inhibits secretion
Sigma
Methanol/5 mg/ml
0.01–5 μg/ml
50
Monensin
Inhibits secretion
Sigma
Methanol/10 mM
0.01–1 μM
81
Ionomycin
Ca2+ ionophore
Sigma
DMSO/10 mM
0.01–5 μM
100
A23187
Ca2+ ionophore
Sigma
DMSO/1 mM
1–100 nM
81
Thapsigargin
Inhibits Ca2+ ATPase
Sigma
DMSO/10 mM
0.1–50 nM
98
Nifedipine
Ca2+ channel blocker
Sigma
DMSO/100 mM
1–100 μM
67
NiCl
Ca2+ channel blocker
Sigma
H2O/500 mM
0.05–5 mM
47
Staurosporine
Inhibits ser-thr kinases
Sigma
DMSO/2 mM
0.1–100 nM
97
H7
Inhibits ser-thr kinases
Sigma
DMSO/100 mM
1–100 μM
40
Bisindolylmaleimide
Inhibits PKC
Calbiochem
DMSO/25 mM
0.5–50 μM
101
Sphingosine
Inhibits PKC
Sigma
DMSO/30 mM
0.3–30 μM
34
PMA
Stimulates PKC
Sigma
DMSO/10 mg/ml
0.01–10 μg/ml
77
Calmidazolium
Inhibits calmodulin
Sigma
DMSO/100 mM
1–10 μM
32
Trifluoperazine
Inhibits calmodulin
Sigma
DMSO/100 mM
1–25 μM
32
Erbstatin analog
Inhibits tyr kinases
Biomol
DMSO/100 mM
0.01–100 μM
104
Herbimycin A
Inhibits tyr kinases
Biomol
DMSO/2 mg/ml
0.02–2 μg/ml
102
Tyrphostin 25
Inhibits tyr kinases
Sigma
DMSO/500 mM
0.05–1,000 μM
61
Embryos and Cell Cultures
Japanese quail embryos were used throughout the study. Eggs were incubated at 38 ± 1°C and staged according to the number of somite pairs.
Neural crest cell cultures were generated essentially as described (25).
Neural tubes were deposited in bacteriological petri dishes coated with fibronectin at 2–5 μg/ml in PBS followed by saturation with heat-denatured
BSA at 10 mg/ml in PBS. Cells were cultured in DME supplemented with
3% bovine serum previously depleted in fibronectin. Time-lapse videomicroscopy analyses were performed in Terasaki plates as described elsewhere (27).
Immunofluorescent Staining
For immunofluorescent labeling of cell cultures, neural tubes were explanted onto fibronectin-coated glass coverslips. Cultures were fixed either in cold methanol for 5 min followed by cold acetone for 1 min to retain the total cellular pool of N-cadherin, or in 3.7% formaldehyde–0.2%
Triton X-100–5% sucrose in PBS for 3 min followed by a 1-h incubation in
3.7% formaldehyde–5% sucrose in PBS to visualize the detergent-insoluble pool. After several rinses in PBS, cultures were subjected to immunofluorescent staining using biotinylated secondary antibodies and fluorescein-conjugated streptavidin (Amersham Intl., Little Chalfont, UK).
Preparations were observed with an epifluorescence microscope (Leica,
Wetzlar, Germany) and photographed using TMAX-400 Kodak film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY).
Cell Extraction with Triton X-100
For preparation of Triton X-100–insoluble fractions of cells, neural crest
cells were obtained from an equal number of neural tube explants for each
experimental condition. Cells were rinsed in PBS and extracted at 4°C for
15 min in ice-cold extraction buffer consisting of 2.5% Triton X-100, 0.1 M
Tris, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM PMSF, 1 mM leupeptin, 10
μg/ml aprotinin, and 10 μg/ml pepstatin A. The cells were then scraped
from the dish in extraction buffer and the cell residue was pelleted at
11,000 g for 10 min. The pellet corresponding to the Triton-insoluble fraction was resuspended at 90°C for 5 min in SDS sample buffer. Protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit
(BCA; Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). The samples were subsequently subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting analysis.
Immunoblotting
For immunoblotting of whole cell extracts, neural crest cells were obtained from an equal number of neural tube explants for each experimental condition. Cells were detached from the substratum using a solution of
0.01% trypsin (type XI; Sigma Chemical Co.) in 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.2, 0.15 M
NaCl, 10 mM Hepes, and 2 mM CaCl2 at 37°C for 5–7 min. Once cells
were detached, trypsin was inactivated by addition of 0.01% soybeantrypsin inhibitor (type II; Sigma Chemical Co.). Cells were then collected
by centrifugation, counted, and lysed at 90°C with SDS sample buffer under reducing conditions. The extracts were clarified by centrifugation and
subjected to SDS-PAGE after determination of protein concentration using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit. PAGE was performed in Laemmli
buffer system on slab 7.5%-polyacrylamide minigels. The protein bands
were electroblotted for 1.5 h onto nitrocellulose in 50 mM Tris-glycine,
20% methanol buffer. The nitrocellulose membranes were then incubated
with BSA at 5 mg/ml in PBS for 1 h at ambient temperature, followed by
incubation with antibody solution for 12 h at 4°C. The sheets were rinsed
in PBS supplemented with 0.2% Tween-20 and incubated first with biotinylated secondary antibodies for 1 h, and then with 125I-streptavidin (Amersham Intl.) at 0.1 μCi/ml for 1 h at room temperature. After rinsing, the
nitrocellulose was dried and subjected to autoradiography. Immunolabelings were quantitated with a PhosphorImager using the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Immunoprecipitation
For immunoprecipitation, neural crest cells obtained from an equal number of neural tube explants for each experimental condition were metabolically labeled at 37°C with [35S]methionine (Amersham Intl.) at 250
μCi/ml or with [32P]orthophosphate (Amersham Intl.) at 1 mCi/ml for 5–8 h.
The viability of cells during labeling was regularly confirmed with an inverted microscope. After radioactive labeling, cells were washed four
times in PBS supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2 and MgCl2 and were extracted for 20 min on ice with extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris, pH 7.2, 0.15 M
NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1% NP-40, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM PMSF, 1 mM leupeptin, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml pepstatin A). Sodium orthovanadate (Na3V04) was added to the extraction buffer at the final concentration of 0.5 mM in the case of [32P]orthophosphate labeling. All subsequent
steps were performed at 4°C. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at
11,000 g for 15 min. The extracts containing equal amounts of acid-precipitable radioactivity were preabsorbed by incubation with nonimmune rabbit serum for 30 min under constant mixing followed by a 1-h incubation
with a 50% suspension of protein A–Sepharose (Sigma Chemical Co.).
After centrifugation to remove the beads, extracts were incubated with
constant mixing, first in the presence of rabbit antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin for 2 h, and then with an excess of a 50% suspension of protein A–Sepharose for 1 h. The beads were subsequently
washed five times with 1% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.2, 0.15 M
NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, and protease inhibitors and, when necessary, 0.5 mM
Na3V04, and extracted at 95°C for 5 min in 2% SDS in 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.2,
0.15 M NaCl. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on 7.5%-acrylamide
gels under reducing conditions and subjected to fluorography or autoradiography. Immune precipitates from 32P-labeled cells were quantitated
with a PhosphorImager.
Results
Induction of Neural Crest Cell Aggregation upon
Inhibition of Fibronectin Adhesion In Vitro
We determined at first whether neural crest cell aggregation could occur in vitro upon inhibition of cell locomotion
on fibronectin, using a battery of agents known to interfere with the binding of integrins to fibronectin, i.e., RGDSpeptides and inhibitory antibodies to fibronectin or to integrins (8, 10, 21, 27, 83). GRDGS peptides and noninhibitory antibodies were used as controls. Neural tube explants were deposited on fibronectin substrata, and neural
crest cells were allowed to migrate out of the explant for
∼15 h. Under these conditions, the neural crest population
organized into an outgrowth of ∼1,500–2,000 cells around
the neural tube. Inhibitory probes were then added to the
culture medium, and their effects on the cell culture were
evaluated for the subsequent 5–8 h.In the presence of GRDGS peptides at 1 mg/ml (Fig. 1
a)
or of noninhibitory antibodies to fibronectin or to integrins, neural crest cells retained a well-spread morphology
with several processes per cell during the time course of
the experiment. Although the cell population was dense,
the contours of individual cells could be easily visualized,
allowing us to distinguish them from their neighbors.
Videomicroscopy studies revealed that cells exchanged
neighbors frequently and formed only transient intercellular contacts.
Figure 1
Inhibition of neural crest cell adhesion to fibronectin by RGDS peptides or antibodies to fibronectin and integrins provokes
cell clustering. Neural crest cells were cultured for 15 h on fibronectin substrata at 3 μg/ml. Cells were subsequently confronted for 5 h
with control GRDGS peptides (a), RGDS peptides (b) both at 1 mg/ml, mAb 333 to fibronectin at 50 μg/ml (c), polyclonal antibodies
2992 anti–β1 integrins at 1 mg/ml (d), mAb HP2/1 to the α4 integrin subunit at 40 μg/ml (e), and mAb LM609 ascite to the αVβ3 integrin at dilution 1:100 (f). In the presence of RGDS peptides and antibodies to fibronectin and β1 integrins, most neural crest cells are retracted and regrouped into compact clusters. In the presence of antibodies to the α4 and αVβ3 integrins, cells remain flattened but form
a monolayer of tightly adherent cells. Bar, 50 μm.
When neural crest cells were confronted with RGDSpeptides at 0.5–2 mg/ml, cells retracted immediately and
became round within an hour after addition of the peptide.
Coincidently, adjacent cells regrouped and formed clusters
that gradually increased in size as they collided with other
clusters or isolated cells. After 5 h in the presence of the
peptide (Fig. 1
b), most cells formed aggregates of about
several cells up to 10 cells. The situation did not evolve significantly during the subsequent hours. By videomicroscopy, it could be observed that, once cells joined clusters
and adhered to them, they rarely detached from them. At
lower concentrations of the peptide (e.g., 0.1 mg/ml), cell
retraction was less extensive and cells became round only
occasionally. However, a significant proportion of the cells
established tight intercellular contacts and formed small
clusters of spread cells (not shown).In the presence of the inhibitory mAb 333 to fibronectin
at 50 μg/ml, neural crest cells retracted, but a number of
them did not round up; instead, they showed an elongated,
bipolar morphology. However, these cells were connected
with their neighbors and formed a continuous network of
cells (Fig. 1
c). Cells that rounded up also formed compact
aggregates, but of sizes generally smaller than in the presence of RGDSpeptides.Polyclonal antibodies 2992 to the β1 integrin subunit at
0.5–1 mg/ml produced the same degree of retraction and
aggregation of neural crest cells as mAb 333 (Fig. 1
d).
Similarly, mAb CSAT also directed against the β1 subunit
caused extensive cell aggregation at 10–50 μg/ml (not
shown). Conversely, the noninhibitory mAbs ES46-8 and
ES66-8 to the β1 chain did not cause neural crest cell aggregation. As migrating neural crest cells express multiple
β1 integrins, including α3β1, α4β1, α5β1, and αvβ1, as potential fibronectin receptors (Delannet, M., S. Testaz, and
J.-L. Duband, manuscript in preparation), specific antibodies to the various α chains have been assayed for causing neural crest cell aggregation. Among them, the function-blocking mAb HP2/1 to the α4 chain caused at 20–50
μg/ml only limited retraction of cell processes but provoked progressively, after several hours, an important regroupment of neighboring cells that organized locally as a
dense monolayer resembling a cluster of epithelial cells
(Fig. 1
e). The nonblocking mAb B5G10 to α4, in contrast,
did not induce neural crest cell compaction. Finally, mAb
P1B5 to the α3 chain did not affect the cohesion of neural
crest cells at all the concentrations tested (not shown). In
addition to β1 integrins, neural crest cells have also been
found to use β3 integrins for migration on extracellular
matrices (20; Delannet, M., S. Testaz, and J.-L. Duband,
manuscript in preparation). The effect of the inhibitory
mAb LM609 to the αvβ3 integrin complex on neural crest
cell cohesion was then evaluated. Like mAb HP2/1, this
antibody provoked a substantial cell clustering but no apparent rounding up of the cells (Fig. 1
f). However, in contrast with mAb HP2/1, mAb LM609 effect was rapid as it
could be detected only after an hour of incubation. Finally,
cyclic Gly-Pen-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro-Cys-Ala (GPenGRG DSPCA) peptides known to affect selectively αv integrins (79) induced aggregation of neural crest cells at 0.1–1
mg/ml (not shown).To quantify the degree of aggregation induced by the
peptides and the antibodies, the number of particles was
counted in a representative region of the neural crest outgrowth. The surface of the region considered was ∼0.2
mm2, corresponding approximately to one-fifth to one-tenth of the total surface occupied by the neural crest population. A particle was defined as an entity that could be
distinguished from its neighbors, i.e., an isolated cell, either round or spread, which showed little or no intercellular contacts with other cells, an aggregate of round cells, or
a monolayer of tightly apposed cells. Table II shows the
number of particles obtained with peptides and antibodies
to fibronectin and to integrins at various concentrations
after 5 h of incubation. This time was chosen essentially
because the number of particles did not evolve significantly during the subsequent hours. About 200–250 particles were found in the absence of any competitor or in the
presence of GRDGS peptides or noninhibitory antibodies
(e.g., mAb ES66-8 to β1 and mAb B5G10 to α4) even at
high doses. In contrast, both the RGD-containing peptides
(RGDS and GPenGRGDSPCA) and inhibitory antibodies to integrins (mAb CSAT and Ab 2992 to β1, mAb
HP2/1 to α4, and mAb LM609 to αvβ3) or to fibronectin
(mAb 333) caused neural crest cell aggregation in a dose-dependent manner; the number of particles dropped to
∼50 in the presence of the inhibitors at the highest concentrations tested.
Table II
Quantitation of the Effect of Competitors of
Fibronectin–Integrin Interactions on the Cohesion of Neural
Crest Cells
Inhibitor of cell–substratum
adhesion
Concentration
Number of
particles
μg/ml
None
/
230 ± 20
RGDS
100
165 ± 19
500
78 ± 5
1,000
50 ± 2
2,000
53 ± 7
GRDGS
1,000
215 ± 10
GPenGRGDSPCA
100
137 ± 24
250
99 ± 14
500
58 ± 14
1,000
64 ± 18
mAb 333 anti-fibronectin
5
129 ± 60
50
56 ± 14
Ab 2992 anti-β1 integrin
100
113 ± 12
1,000
42 ± 5
mAb CSAT anti-β1 integrin
10
162 ± 25
20
54 ± 9
40
44 ± 10
mAb ES66-8 anti-β1 integrin
100
215 ± 10
mAb HP2/1 anti-α4 integrin
10
138 ± 22
20
80 ± 24
40
68 ± 15
mAb B5G10 anti-α4 integrin
50
220 ± 25
mAb LM609 anti-αVβ3 integrin
1/250*
203 ± 16
1/100*
88 ± 38
1/25*
67 ± 11
Results are expressed as the number of particles that were counted in an arbitrarily defined region of each neural crest outgrowth and covering ∼0.2 mm2, after 5 h of incubation with the competitor. Values represent the mean ± SD of a minimum of eight
measurements in at least two independent experiments.
Dilution of ascitic fluid.
Cell Aggregation Induced by Inhibitors of Substratum
Adhesion Is Mediated by N-cadherin
We then examined whether neural crest cell aggregation
upon inhibition of cell adhesion to fibronectin was mediated by N-cadherin, using both functional and immunodetection assays. Neural crest cells were confronted with
RGDSpeptides or antibodies to integrins in the presence
of antibodies to N-cadherin either inhibitory or not. Fig. 2
shows the morphology and cohesion of cells and Table III
gives the values of the numbers of particles. The inhibitory
mAbs to N-cadherin tested (mAbs NCD-2 or A-CAMCC-11) severely blocked aggregation induced by the RGDSpeptides in a dose-dependent manner. The number of particles systematically reached values >150 at the highest
concentration of the mAbs tested. Most cells remained round
and isolated, and the few clusters that could be detected
were composed of no more than five cells that were loosely
attached together (Fig. 2
a). In contrast, the noninhibitory
mAb A-CAM ID-7.2.3 did not perturb cell aggregation at
all (Fig. 2
b). The inhibitory mAbs to N-cadherin were also
extremely potent in blocking cell aggregation induced by
antibodies to fibronectin or to the β1 integrin subunit (not
shown), by mAb HP2/1 to the α4 subunit (Fig. 2
c), by mAb
LM609 to the αvβ3 integrin (Fig. 2
d), or lastly by the cyclic
GPenGRGDSPCA peptide (not shown).
Figure 2
Neural crest cell aggregation induced by RGDS peptides and antibodies to integrins is mediated by N-cadherin. Effect of antibodies to N-cadherin on neural crest cell aggregation induced by RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml (a and b), by mAb HP2/1 to α4 integrin
subunit at 40 μg/ml (c), and by mAb LM609 ascite to the αVβ3 integrin at dilution 1:100 (d). Cells were confronted during 5 h with peptides or anti-integrin antibodies in the presence of antibodies to N-cadherin either inhibitory (A-CAM CC-11; a, c, and d) or noninhibitory (A-CAM ID-7.2.3; b), both at 5 μg/ml. Note that cells treated with both anti–N-cadherin antibodies and antibodies to α4 or αVβ3
integrins are less spread than when antibodies to N-cadherin are omitted (compare with Fig. 1, e and f). Bar, 50 μm.
Table III
Effect of Antibodies to N-cadherin on Neural Crest
Cell Aggregation Induced by RGDS-containing Peptides or by
Antibodies to Integrins
Inhibitor of cell–substratum
adhesion
Antibody to
N-cadherin
Antibody
concentration
Number of
particles
μg/ml
None
None
/
227 ± 12
None
A-CAM CC-11
5
250 ± 11
RGDS 1 mg/ml
None
/
55 ± 8
NCD-2
5
151 ± 16
A-CAM CC-11
5
219 ± 49
1
130 ± 15
0.25
95 ± 13
A-CAM ID-7.2.3
5
71 ± 15
GPenGRGDSPCA 0.5 mg/ml
None
/
51 ± 10
A-CAM CC-11
5
244 ± 27
Ab 2992 1 mg/ml
None
/
35 ± 5
A-CAM CC-11
5
203 ± 24
mAb HP2/1 40 μg/ml
None
/
86 ± 21
A-CAM CC-11
5
201 ± 18
mAb LM609 1/100
None
/
62 ± 16
A-CAM CC-11
5
250 ± 30
Results are expressed as the number of particles that were counted in an arbitrarily defined region of each neural crest outgrowth after 5 h of treatment. Values represent the
mean ± SD of a minimum of 10 measurements in at least two independent experiments.
The surface expression of N-cadherin was analyzed by
immunofluorescence. As shown previously (71), when formaldehyde fixation combined with Triton X-100 was used
to reveal the insoluble pool of N-cadherin, immunoreactivity was essentially concentrated at the tip of the cell processes in regions of intercellular contacts in the absence of
any adhesion inhibitor (Fig. 3
a). When cells were fixed in
cold methanol to visualize the total cellular pool of N-cadherin, a diffuse staining over the entire cell surface became
also apparent (not shown, but see 71). Aggregates of cells
in the presence of RGDSpeptides or anti–β1 integrin antibodies showed a conspicuous staining over the entire cell
surface and in regions of cell–cell contacts, both in cells
fixed with methanol and with formaldehyde and Triton
X-100 (Fig. 3, b and c). In cells treated with mAb HP2/1
(Fig. 3
d) or mAb LM609 (not shown), immunoreactivity
was distributed in cell peripheries in an almost continuous
belt in regions of cell–cell contacts, regardless of the type
of fixation used.
Figure 3
Immunofluorescence staining for N-cadherin on neural crest cells confronted with RGDS peptides or antibodies to integrins.
Cells cultured on fibronectin were incubated for 5 h to control nonperturbing peptides (a), to RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml (b), to mAb
CSAT to β1 integrins at 20 μg/ml (c), or to mAb HP2/1 to α4 integrin subunit at 40 μg/ml (d), fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde in the presence of 0.2% Triton X-100, and processed for immunofluorescence staining. Under normal conditions, N-cadherin immunoreactivity is
essentially concentrated at the tip of cell processes in contact with other cells (arrows). In cells aggregated by RGDS peptides, N-cadherin staining is conspicuous over most of the cell surface, particularly in regions of cell–cell contacts. In cells treated with mAb CSAT
or HP2/1, staining is essentially accumulated in the cell periphery in areas of intercellular contacts. Bar, 20 μm.
The relative amounts of N-cadherin synthesized and
expressed in aggregated and nonaggregated cells were
evaluated by immunoblots and immunoprecipitations of
[35S]methionine-labeled extracts of cells using polyclonal
antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of the N-cadherin
molecule. In immunoblots of total cell extracts, the antibodies recognized mainly a band of ∼130 kD, corresponding to N-cadherin (36), as well as a faint band of a higher
molecular mass, corresponding to its biosynthetic precursor (78). As shown in Fig. 4
a, lanes 1–3, aggregated and
nonaggregated neural crest cells expressed similar amounts
of N-cadherin, and no difference in the apparent molecular mass of the protein was observed. Quantitation of the
intensity of the bands using a PhosphorImager demonstrated that the total amount of N-cadherin was nearly
identical in nontreated cells and in cells treated with RGDSpeptides or antibodies to integrins. In immune precipitates
of metabolically labeled cell extracts, both N-cadherin and
its precursor were in similar amounts in treated and nontreated extracts (Fig. 4
b). Likewise, the other components
that were coprecipitated with N-cadherin, including α-, β-,
and γ-catenins, showed also almost identical electrophoretic patterns in all extracts. Finally, we have evaluated by
immunoblotting the relative amount of N-cadherin in the
Triton X-100–insoluble fraction of cells that presumably
reflects the proportion of cadherin molecules associated
with the cytoskeleton (1, 41, 66, 74). Consistent with the
immunofluorescence studies, the relative amount of N-cadherin in the Triton X-100–insoluble fraction of cells was
significantly higher in treated cells (Fig. 4
a, lanes 4–6).
PhosphorImager quantitation analyses of six independent
experiments showed a mean increase of 36% and 54% in
cells confronted with mAb CSAT and RGDSpeptides, respectively. The proportion of N-cadherin molecules in the
Triton X-100–insoluble pool relative to the total cellular
amount of N-cadherin was estimated to be ∼30–35% in
untreated neural crest cells and reached 50% in cells
treated with peptides or antibodies. Thus, induction of cell
clustering upon inhibition of fibronectin adhesion corresponded primarily to an increase in the proportion of cadherin–catenin complexes associated with the cytoskeleton.
Figure 4
Immunoblot and immunoprecipitation analyses of
N-cadherin expression and localization in neural crest cells using
antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of the N-cadherin molecule. (a) Immunoblot of total cell extracts (lanes 1–3) and of Triton X-100–insoluble fractions (lanes 4–6) of untreated cells (lanes
1 and 4) and of cells confronted with the mAb CSAT anti-β1 integrin at 20 μg/ml (lanes 2 and 5) and RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml
(lanes 3 and 6). Equal amounts of material were loaded in lanes
1–3 and 4–6, respectively. The relative intensities of the N-cadherin bands in the Triton X-100–insoluble fractions measured using a PhosphorImager were estimated to be 100, 133, and 145%
for the untreated, mAb CSAT–treated, and RGDS peptide–
treated cells, respectively. (b) Immunoprecipitation of extracts of
metabolically labeled neural crest cells in the absence of inhibitors of substratum adhesion (lane 1) or in the presence of the
mAb CSAT anti-β1 integrin at 20 μg/ml (lane 2) and RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml (lane 3). Equal amounts of material were loaded
in each lane. Arrows point at N-cadherin and its biosynthetic precursor at 130 and 135 kD, respectively, and arrowheads at α-, β-,
and γ-catenins at ∼105, 95, and 85 kD. Positions of molecular
mass markers are indicated on the left.
Cell Aggregation Requires Recruitment of an
Intracellular Pool of N-cadherin Molecules
We next determined whether the increase in cell cohesion
in cells treated with inhibitors of integrin function resulted
from the redistribution of the preexisting N-cadherin molecules on the cell surface or from the recruitment of a cytoplasmic pool of molecules into the developing junctions.
To address this question, we first analyzed the effects of
agents known to affect macromolecule synthesis and secretion on the aggregation of neural crest cells. Cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, caused a significant decrease of cell aggregation in the presence of RGDSpeptides, but only after a long preincubation period of at
least 5 h (Figs. 5
a and 6 a). After shorter preincubations
(1–3 h), it did not affect cell clustering at all. In contrast,
brefeldin A, a potent inhibitor of protein transfer from the
Golgi apparatus to the membrane, abrogated cell aggregation almost totally at concentrations above 1 μg/ml, and no
preincubation with the drug was required to obtain strong
inhibition (Fig. 5
b). Cells were round and isolated and
only occasionally regrouped into clusters of less than five
cells (Fig. 6
a). Likewise, monensin, a sodium ionophore
also known to perturb glycoprotein secretion, produced
the same effect as brefeldin A (Fig. 5
c). In agreement with
previous studies (90), tunicamycin, an inhibitor of N-glycosylation, did not affect cell aggregation even at high doses
(not shown). Expression of N-cadherin in cells treated
with RGDSpeptides in the presence of these drugs was
analyzed by immunoblotting (Fig. 7
a). Cycloheximide
caused the complete disappearance of the biosynthetic
precursor of N-cadherin. In contrast, brefeldin A and
monensin provoked an important increase in the amount
of the precursor, probably resulting from its accumulation
in the ER. When cells were confronted with RGDSpeptides in the presence of brefeldin A (or monensin) combined with cycloheximide, the amount of the precursor
band was considerably reduced. Interestingly, treatment
with brefeldin A reduced the proportion of the N-cadherin
amount in the Triton X-100–insoluble pool to levels close
to those found in control cells in the absence of RGDSpeptides (Fig. 7
b).
Figure 5
Neural crest cell aggregation is mediated by N-cadherin molecules recruited from
an intracellular pool. (a–c) Effects of inhibitors of macromolecule synthesis (cycloheximide; a)
and secretion (brefeldin and
monensin; b and c) on neural
crest cell aggregation induced by
RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml.
Cells were preincubated with cycloheximide for 1–5 h or with
brefeldin A or monensin for 30
min, before addition of the peptides for the subsequent 5 h. (d)
Effect of low temperatures on
neural crest cell aggregation.
Cells were confronted with
RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml at 37°
or 18°C for 5 h or were incubated first at 18°C in the presence or not of the peptides for 3 h
followed by a 2-h incubation at
37°C. (e) Effect of removal of
the surface pool of N-cadherin
molecules on neural crest cell
aggregation. Cells were treated
or not for 5 min with a trypsin
solution at 0.001% in Ca2+-free
medium before addition of the
RGDS peptides at 1 μg/ml for
the subsequent 5 h. Results are
expressed as the number of particles that were counted in an arbitrarily defined region of each
neural crest outgrowth and covering ∼0.2 mm2. Values represent the mean ± SD of a minimum of eight measurements in
at least two independent experiments.
Figure 6
(a and b) Cell–cell interactions among cells confronted during 5 h with peptides in the presence of cycloheximide at 0.1 mg/ml
(a) and brefeldin A at 1 μg/ml (b). In the case of cycloheximide, cells were preincubated with the drug for ∼5 h before addition of the
peptide. (c–f) Cell–cell interactions among cells treated (c) or not (d) with RGDS peptides at 18°C during 5 h and among cells treated
first at 18°C during 3 h and then at 37°C during 2 h either in the absence (e) or presence (f) of RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml. Bar, 50 μm.
Figure 7
Immunoblotting analyses of N-cadherin expression and
localization in cells treated with inhibitors of protein synthesis
and secretion using antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of the
N-cadherin molecule. (a) Total cell extracts of untreated cells
(lane 1) and of cells treated with RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml
alone (lane 2) or in combination with cycloheximide at 0.1 μg/ml
(lane 3), brefeldin A at 1 μg/ml (lane 4), and brefeldin A plus cycloheximide (lane 5). (b) Triton X-100–insoluble fractions of untreated cells (lane 1) and of cells treated with RGDS peptides at 1
mg/ml in combination with brefeldin A at 1 μg/ml (lane 2) or
alone (lane 3). The relative intensities of the N-cadherin bands in
the Triton X-100–insoluble fractions measured using a PhosphorImager were estimated to be 100, 108, and 161% for lanes 1, 2,
and 3, respectively. Arrows point at N-cadherin and its biosynthetic precursor at 130 and 135 kD. Positions of molecular mass
markers are indicated on the left. Equal amounts of material
were loaded in each lane in a and b, respectively.
We also evaluated whether neural crest cell clustering
could be achieved with RGDSpeptides at low temperatures (i.e., below 20°C), as it is known that cytoplasmic vesicular traffic and protein secretions are considerably reduced at those temperatures. Cells incubated at 18–20°C in
the absence of peptides remained attached to the substratum and, although they showed a slight retraction of cellular extensions, they did not regroup into clusters (Figs. 5
d
and 6 c). Cells treated for 5 h with RGD peptides at the
same temperatures did not regroup into multicellular aggregates, and values for the number of particles were comparable to controls in the absence of peptides (Figs. 5
d
and 6 d). However, when cells were shifted to 37°C after a
preincubation period of 3 h at 18°C in the presence of peptides, aggregation was restored to levels normally obtained
when cells were continuously treated at 37°C (Figs. 5
d and
6 f ). In contrast, in the absence of peptides, cells shifted
from 18° to 37°C regained their flattened morphology and
did not form clusters (Figs. 5
d and 6 e).Finally, to further demonstrate that the preexisting pool
of surface N-cadherin molecules is dispensable for neural
crest cell aggregation caused by RGDSpeptides, we analyzed the effect of these peptides on cells that have been
briefly treated with trypsin to remove surface N-cadherin
molecules. Cells were incubated for 5–10 min with trypsin
at low concentrations (0.001%) in Ca2+-free medium, followed by incubation with 0.01% soybean trypsin inhibitor,
a treatment sufficient to remove the bulk of surface cadherin molecules without damaging other surface molecules (94). In addition, to prevent extensive inactivation of
integrins and cell detachment from the substratum, Mg2+
at 2 mM was added to the trypsin solution. Under these
conditions, cells remained spread onto the bottom of the
dish and cell processes retracted only slightly (Fig. 8
a).
The reduction in surface N-cadherin after trypsin treatment was assessed both by immunostaining of cells and by
immunoblotting. By immunofluorescence, N-cadherin staining was almost undetectable on the cells' surface and was
confined intracellularly to perinuclear vesicles (Fig. 8
b, compare with Fig. 3
a). PhosphorImager quantitation analyses
of immunoblots of total cell extracts showed a 80% reduction in the overall amount of N-cadherin, the remaining
20% corresponding possibly to the intracellular pool of
N-cadherin molecules inaccessible to the enzyme treatment (not shown). When confronted with RGDSpeptides
at 1 mg/ml, neural crest cells treated with trypsin formed
aggregates of sizes very similar to those in untreated cells
(Figs. 5
e and 8 c), and we did not observe any delay in cell
clustering.
Figure 8
Effect of removal of the surface pool of N-cadherin molecules on neural crest cell aggregation. (a and b) Morphology of neural crest cells (a) and immunofluorescence staining for N-cadherin on neural crest cells (b), immediately after a 5-min treatment with
a trypsin solution at 0.001% in Ca2+-free medium. N-cadherin staining has almost entirely disappeared from the cell surface including
from intercellular contacts (arrow) and is only detectable intracellularly. (c) Cell–cell interactions among neural crest cells confronted
for 5 h with RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml after trypsin treatment. Note that cells form aggregates as compact as untreated cells. Bars: (a)
50 μm; (b) 20 μm.
N-cadherin Function in Neural Crest Cells Is
Dependent upon Transmembrane Ca2+ Fluxes and
Activity of Kinases
The results described above show that inhibition of integrin activity by adhesion blockers causes rapid cell–cell
aggregation mediated by N-cadherin molecules that are
recruited from a trypsin-resistant pool that is likely translocated to the cell surface and presumably associated with
the actin cytoskeleton. We have shown previously that, in
motile neural crest cells, N-cadherin–based junctions can
be restored upon inhibition of tyrosine kinases, phosphotyrosine phosphatases, and protein kinases C, suggesting
that, during migration, N-cadherin activity is repressed by
a cascade of intracellular signaling events (71). To determine which signals are elicited by integrins, we have analyzed the effects of agents known to interfere specifically
with signaling pathways on the neural crest cell aggregation induced by RGDSpeptides or antibodies to integrins.
Agents were also tested in the absence of these adhesion
blockers.As described previously (71), inhibitors of tyrosine kinases, such as herbimycin, tyrphostins, or erbstatin analog,
and inhibitors of protein kinases C, such as bisindolylmaleimide and sphingosine, all produced rapid and strong clustering of neural crest cells in the absence of RGDSpeptides or anti-integrin antibodies. In addition, these agents
neither amplified nor diminished peptide- or antibody-
induced cell aggregation (not shown). On the other hand,
phorbol esters, which activate protein kinases C, and inhibitors of calmodulin-dependent kinases, such as calmidazolium and trifluoperazine, did not interfere with the effect of RGDSpeptides on neural crest cells nor did they
provoke cell aggregation when applied alone (not shown).In contrast, the Ca2+ ionophores, ionomycin and the
compound A23187, were both found to inhibit in a dose-dependent manner the RGDS peptide-induced aggregation of neural crest cells (Fig. 9, a and b). This inhibitory
effect was apparently restricted to Ca2+ ionophores, as
valinomycin, a potassium ionophore, was ineffective on
neural crest cell aggregation at all the concentrations tested
(not shown). At high concentrations, ionomycin and A23187
totally abrogated cell aggregation and, at low concentrations, both compounds still diminished cell aggregation
significantly (Fig. 9, a and b). In the presence of these
drugs, neural crest cells treated with RGDSpeptides were
round and isolated and, when present, clusters of cells
were composed of a few individuals (Fig. 10
a). Ionomycin
also blocked in a dose-dependent manner clustering of
neural crest cells in the presence of cyclic GpenGRGDSPCA peptides and of antibodies to β1 integrins, to the α4
subunit or to αvβ3 (Fig. 9
a). Interestingly, in the absence
of RGDSpeptides or of antibodies to integrins, ionomycin
and A23187 reduced significantly the degree of cell cohesion among the neural crest cell population (Figs. 9, a and
b, and 10 b).
Figure 9
Quantitation of the
effect of agents that affect
transmembrane Ca2+ fluxes
and intracellular Ca2+ concentration on the aggregation of neural crest cells. In c,
the mAb A-CAM CC-11 was
applied at the concentration
of 5 μg/ml. Results are expressed as the number of
particles that were counted
in an arbitrarily defined region of each neural crest outgrowth and covering ∼0.2
mm2, after 5 h of incubation
with the agent combined or
not with RGDS peptides
and antibodies to integrins.
Values represent the mean ±
SD of a minimum of eight
measurements in at least two
independent experiments.
Figure 10
(a and b) Effect of the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin on neural crest cell aggregation induced by RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml. Cells
were confronted during 5 h with ionomycin at 1 μM in the presence (a) or absence (b) of RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml. (c and d) Effects of
Ni2+, a blocker of voltage-independent Ca2+ channels (c), and nifedipine, a blocker of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (d), on neural
crest cell cohesion in the absence of RGDS peptides after 5 h of treatment. (e and f) Immunofluorescence staining for N-cadherin on
neural crest cells treated with ionomycin at 1 μM in the presence (e) or absence (f) of RGDS peptides. Note that N-cadherin staining has
almost entirely disappeared from the regions of cell–cell contacts in cells treated with ionomycin alone (arrow). Bars: (a) 50 μm; (e) 20 μm.
As Ca2+ ionophores severely reduced neural crest cell
aggregation, we tested whether agents known for blocking
Ca2+ channels would produce the opposite effect in the
absence of peptides or antibodies to integrins. La3+, a
commonly used blocker of voltage-independent Ca2+
channels, could not be used because it precipitated phosphate from the culture medium and neural crest cells did
not survive long in phosphate-depleted media. However,
as shown in Fig. 9
c, Ni2+, another blocker of voltage-independent Ca2+ channels, provoked a rapid cell aggregation
among the neural crest population at concentrations between 0.5 and 5 mM. In the presence of 2.5 mM Ni2+, for
example, cells remained spread but with few cellular processes, and they formed extensive intercellular contacts as
in epithelial sheets (Fig. 10
c). This clustering effect of
Ni2+ on neural crest cells could be abolished by antibodies
to N-cadherin (Fig. 9
c). In contrast, none of various inhibitors of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels tested, like
nifedipine (Figs. 9
d and 10 d) and verapamil (data not
shown), induced aggregation of neural crest cells. These
data therefore suggest that the control of N-cadherin activity in neural crest cells involves voltage-independent,
receptor-activated Ca2+ channels. To further confirm this
hypothesis, we evaluated the effect of thapsigargin, an inhibitor of the ER Ca2+-ATPase known to cause a transient increase of cytosolic free Ca2+ without involvement
of extracellular Ca2+, hydrolysis of phosphoinositides, and
activation of protein kinases C (98). We found that thapsigargin did not perturb aggregation of neural crest cells at
all the concentrations tested (Fig. 9
e).Expression of N-cadherin on neural crest cells confronted with RGDSpeptides in the presence of ionomycin
(or A23187) was further analyzed by immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence. Ionomycin
did not affect the overall content of N-cadherin in cells
treated with RGDS (Fig. 11
a). Consistent with this finding, by immunofluorescence, we observed no major change
in the intensity of N-cadherin immunoreactivity on neural
crest cells with RGDSpeptides plus ionomycin (Fig. 10
e),
compared with peptides alone (Fig. 3
b). Isolated round
cells showed a strong staining on their surface. However,
ionomycin significantly reduced the relative amount of
N-cadherin in the Triton X-100–insoluble fraction of neural crest cells, even in cells that were not treated with
RGDSpeptides (Fig. 11
b). Quantitative analyses using a
PhosphorImager revealed that the N-cadherin content in
the Triton X-100–insoluble pool of cells with ionomycin is
∼80% of that in control cells. This reduction was also observed in immunofluorescence studies showing an almost
complete absence of intercellular contacts in cells treated
with ionomycin alone (Fig. 10
f).
Figure 11
Immunoblotting analyses of N-cadherin expression
and localization in cells treated with Ca2+ ionophores using antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of the N-cadherin molecule. (a)
Total cell extracts of untreated cells (lane 1) and of cells treated
with RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml in combination with ionomycin
at 1 μM (lane 2). (b) Triton X-100–insoluble fractions of untreated cells (lane 1) and of cells treated with ionomycin at 1 μM
(lane 2). The relative intensities of the N-cadherin bands in the
Triton X-100–insoluble fractions measured using a PhosphorImager were estimated to be 100 and 85% for the untreated and the
ionomycin-treated cells, respectively. Arrows point at N-cadherin
at 130 kD. Positions of molecular mass markers are indicated on
the left. Equal amounts of material were loaded in each lane in a
and b, respectively.
Elevation of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration is
known to initiate a complex series of cytoplasmic signaling
events, among which activation of the calmodulin-dependent serine-threonine kinases and the phosphatase calcineurin is most important. To investigate which downstream events might be activated after Ca2+ influxes in
neural crest cells, we have tested whether the effect of ionomycin on RGDS peptide-induced neural crest cell aggregation could be challenged by addition of various kinase
inhibitors. Neural crest cells were first confronted with
RGDSpeptides in the presence of ionomycin for ∼3 h,
i.e., until cells were clearly round and isolated, kinase inhibitors were then added, and the intercellular contacts
were scored during the subsequent hours. As shown in Table IV, staurosporine and H7, which affect a broad spectrum of serine-threonine kinases, were able to significantly
reverse the effect of ionomycin on neural crest cells. In
contrast, ionomycin effect could not be abolished by addition of inhibitors of tyrosine kinases or of protein kinases
C alone.
Table IV
Reversal of Ionomycin Effect by Addition of
Kinase Inhibitors
Initial
treatment
Kinase
inhibitor
Number of
particles
None
None
210 ± 20
RGDS 1 mg/ml
None
40 ± 8
RGDS + ionomycin 1 μM
None
240 ± 17
None
Staurosporine 100 nM
68 ± 6
RGDS + ionomycin
Staurosporine 100 nM
111 ± 20
None
H7 250 μM
77 ± 17
RGDS + ionomycin
H7 250 μM
98 ± 15
None
Sphingosine 25 μM
52 ± 7
RGDS + ionomycin
Sphingosine 25 μM
220 ± 41
None
Bisindolylmaleimide 25 μM
70 ± 5
RGDS + ionomycin
Bisindolylmaleimide 25 μM
196 ± 22
None
Herbimycin 2 μg/ml
24 ± 19
RGDS + ionomycin
Herbimycin 2 μg/ml
220 ± 40
Neural crest cells were first treated with RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml combined with
ionomycin at 1 μM until they became round and isolated (designated as initial treatment), inhibitors of kinases were then added, and the cohesion of the cell population
was analyzed during the following 3–5 h. Results are expressed as the number of particles that were counted in an arbitrarily defined region of each neural crest outgrowth
after 5 h of treatment. Values represent the mean ± SD of a minimum of 10 measurements in at least two independent experiments.
Cell Aggregation Is Correlated with Changes in
Catenin Phosphorylation
Elevation of tyrosine phosphorylation of constituents of
adherens junctions, including β-catenin and cadherins, has
been proposed to cause alterations in their stability (5, 35,
65, 92, 108, 109). We then examined whether phosphorylation of N-cadherin and catenin molecules was modified in
neural crest cells upon treatment with RGDSpeptides.
Cells incubated or not with peptides were metabolically labeled with 32P, extracted with detergents, and subjected to
immunoprecipitations using antibodies to the cytoplasmic
domain of N-cadherin. As shown on Fig. 12
a, N-cadherin
was phosphorylated in neural crest cells whether or not they
were confronted with peptides. Quantitation of the radioactivity incorporated into the bands with a PhosphorImager revealed that the level of phosphorylation of N-cadherin was not significantly different in RGDS-treated and
untreated cells. In contrast, a number of other bands that
coprecipitated with N-cadherin, and more particularly
β- and γ-catenins and a band of ∼180 kD, were phosphorylated strongly in cells treated with RGD peptides and
only poorly in untreated cells. We next analyzed the tyrosine-specific phosphorylation of N-cadherin and catenins.
N-cadherin–catenin complexes were immunoprecipitated
using antibodies to N-cadherin and analyzed for reactivity
to anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies by immunoblotting
(Fig. 12
b). No bands corresponding to N-cadherin, catenins,
or the 180-kD protein reacted with the antibodies to phosphotyrosine in extracts of both RGDS-treated and untreated cells, suggesting that elevation of phosphorylation
upon RGDS peptide treatment occurred primarily on serine
and threonine residues.
Figure 12
Analysis of N-cadherin phosphorylation in neural
crest cells confronted with RGDS peptides. (a) Immunoprecipitation of total cell extracts of 32P-labeled untreated neural crest
cells (lane 1) and cells treated with RGDS peptides at 1 mg/ml
(lane 2) using antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of the N-cadherin molecule. (b) Tyrosine phosphorylation of N-cadherin in
neural crest cells. Extracts of untreated (lane 1) and RGDS-treated (lane 2) neural crest cells first were immunoprecipitated
with antibodies to the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin, and then
were analyzed for tyrosine phosphorylation using immunoblotting with antibodies to phosphotyrosine. (Lanes 3 and 4) Total
extracts of untreated and RGDS-treated cells, respectively, subjected to immunoblotting using antibodies to phosphotyrosine.
The arrow points at N-cadherin, and arrowheads point at α-, β-,
and γ-catenins at ∼105, 95, and 85 kD. Positions of molecular
mass markers are indicated on the left. Equal amounts of material were loaded in each lane in a and b, respectively.
Discussion
Descriptive studies of the expression patterns of cell-to-cell
and cell-to-substratum adhesion molecules during the development of the neural crest have revealed precisely coordinated and dynamic modulations in the repertoire of
adhesion systems both at initiation and cessation of cell
migration (see for reviews 26, 28, 46, 58). Recent functional studies further demonstrated that, at the onset of
migration, neural crest cells gradually acquire cell-to-substratum adhesion mediated by integrins and that, conversely, N-cadherin–based cell–cell contacts are reduced
as a result of intracellular processes involving signaling
events (19, 71, 76). However, the regulatory mechanisms
that both spatially and temporally control the occurrence
of these changes are poorly understood. In particular, the
inverse correlation between the activity of N-cadherin and
the migratory behavior of cells raises the important, as yet
unanswered question as to whether the cell–cell and cell–
substratum adhesion systems in neural crest cells are regulated separately by distinct mechanisms or, alternatively, if
they belong to a cascade of tightly connected, interdependent events. In the present study, to address this question
of the possible inter relationship between the cell–cell and
cell–substratum adhesion systems, we investigated whether
repression of N-cadherin function in neural crest cells
might be directly related to the integrin-dependent migratory process or if this event requires additional signals independently of cell motion. Although they do not exclude
the possible implication of external factors, our data are in
favor of a direct, negative control of the surface distribution and activity of N-cadherin by intracellular signals elicited by integrins during cell migration, thus exemplifying
possible cross talk mechanisms between cell–cell and cell–
substratum adhesion systems in neural crest cells.Formation of adherens junctions is a complex, multistep
process that has been much studied in epithelial MDCK
cells (1, 41, 66, 74). In these cells, E-cadherin and β-catenin are first assembled in the ER and progressively exported to the plasma membrane where they become soon
associated with α-catenin. While the synthesis of N-cadherin and formation of cadherin–catenin complexes in
migrating neural crest cells does not differ significantly
from that of MDCK cells or of other nonmotile cells,
there appear to be major differences in the stabilization of
the developing contacts. In stationary MDCK cells, the
E-cadherin–catenin complexes are almost immediately
and entirely incorporated into adherens junctions in association with the cytoskeleton upon arrival at the plasma
membrane, providing rapid initiation of tight cell–cell interactions. In neural crest cells, in contrast, the bulk of the
N-cadherin–catenin complexes is kept excluded from adherens junctions, with only ∼30% of the cadherin molecules being incorporated into the Triton X-100–insoluble
fraction, thus resulting in caracteristically unstable intercellular contacts. In the presence of RGDSpeptides or
anti-integrin antibodies, while the overall surface amount
of N-cadherin is not substantially modified, the proportion
of N-cadherin molecules in the Triton-X-100–insoluble
cellular fraction is significantly increased. In addition, inhibition of intracellular vesicular traffic abrogated cell
aggregation. These data suggest that, upon addition of inhibitors of substratum adhesion, newly synthesized N-cadherin–catenin complexes are preferably targeted into the
transient cell–cell contacts, which in turn become stabilized. Most importantly, the preexisting pool of N-cadherin molecules that are initially diffuse over the cell surface is apparently not recruited to adherens junctions when
RGDSpeptides or anti-integrin antibodies are added, thus
implying that these molecules may be possibly irreversibly
inactivated. Therefore, our data raise the intriguing possibility that, in neural crest cells, integrins might regulate
N-cadherin activity in an exquisite manner that would essentially consist of keeping cell–cell contacts transient by
preventing accumulation of cadherin–catenin complexes
into these contacts.The integrin-dependent control of N-cadherin activity in
migrating neural crest cells appeared to involve intracellular signaling events. More specifically, the effects of agents
selected for elevating the intracellular Ca2+ concentration
or for affecting Ca2+ channels suggest that transmembrane
Ca2+ fluxes across the plasma membrane may be a major
step in the signaling cascade involved in the repression of
cadherin function. Transient increase in the intracellular
Ca2+ concentration is one of the numerous signal transduction pathways that are triggered by integrin engagement (see for reviews 18, 52, 91, 112). In endothelial cells,
for example, this rise in intracellular Ca2+ occurs upon adhesion to fibronectin and vitronectin but not to collagen,
and it is mediated by αv integrins (84, 85). In addition, the
integrin-associated protein, a 50-kD protein physically associated with the αvβ3 integrin, is apparently required for
this event (15, 87). Our finding that blocking αvβ3 integrin
with specific inhibitory antibodies causes rapid neural
crest cell clustering therefore suggests that this particular
integrin might be responsible for the transmembrane Ca2+
fluxes that would initiate the cascade of events that ultimately repress N-cadherin activity. Whether integrin-associated protein or another mechanism coupling integrins to
calcium signaling is involved in this process remains, however, to be determined (91).Interestingly, it has been shown that the αvβ3 integrin-mediated Ca2+ influxes observed in endothelial cells and
in neutrophils are required for cell locomotion on vitronectin and fibronectin but are dispensable for cell
spreading (57, 63, 85). This would then suggest that the
control of N-cadherin activity by integrin-dependent signals in neural crest cells may be intimately and specifically
related to cell motion. Consistent with this finding, aggregation of neural crest cells was achieved upon inhibition of
α4β1 and αvβ3, which are precisely the major integrins implicated in the dynamics of cell locomotion on fibronectin
and vitronectin in neural crest cells as well as in various
other cell types (e.g., see 16, 20, 27, 57; Delannet, M., S.
Testaz, and J.-L. Duband, manuscript in preparation). In
addition, noninhibitory antibodies to integrins were systematically ineffective in inducing cell aggregation, thus
ruling out the possibility that cell aggregation might result
from the clustering effect of the antibodies, known to activate a number of the integrin-dependent intracellular signaling events (68, 69). On the other hand, neural crest cells
cultured on high affinity substrata composed of antibodies
to the β1 integrin subunit or migrating in vitro from immature neural tube explants exhibit reduced locomotory
competence, move as a cohesive cell sheet, and form extensive cell–cell contacts essentially as a result of the inability of cells to detach from the substratum (19, 24). Interestingly, in contrast with nonmotile cells that display
broad and stable adherens junctions while being firmly anchored to the extracellular matrix (21, 71), transformed
cells and tumor cells also maintain reduced cell–cell contacts while showing active integrin-dependent migratory
properties (see for reviews 9, 95, 105), suggesting that control of cadherin activity by integrins might be a general
feature common to all motile cells.We tentatively searched for the intracellular events that
are secondarily activated after Ca2+ entry through the
membrane in neural crest cells. We found that inhibitors
of serine-threonine kinases with limited selectivity such as
H7 and staurosporine but not by inhibitors of protein kinases C, such as bisindolylmaleimide, could reverse to
some extent the effect of the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin
on neural crest cell aggregation, meaning that the propagation of the Ca2+ signal involves kinases distinct from
protein kinases C. Other known targets of Ca2+, such as
the Ca2+-dependent serine-threonine phosphatase calcineurin, are likely to be also triggered in neural crest cells
(see below), but this has not been investigated in the
present study. Inhibitors of tyrosine kinases, such as herbimycin, could not, in contrast, challenge the effect of Ca2+
ionophores. However, tyrosine kinases and phosphotyrosine phosphatases have been shown previously to participate in the regulation of N-cadherin–based junctions in
migrating neural crest cells (71). A plausible explanation is
that the activity of these tyrosine kinases and phosphotyrosine phosphatases may not be directly connected with
integrin signals, but instead would be driven by other surface receptors. The nature of these receptors remains to be
determined, but receptors for growth factors with tyrosine
kinase activity are likely candidates. Several recent studies
have indeed demonstrated the linkage of cadherins to signaling pathways elicited by receptors for the EGF, the
hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, and Wnt-1 (42, 45,
88). Therefore, N-cadherin activity in neural crest cells
would possibly be under the dual control of integrins and
growth factor receptors. Synergistic interactions between
signals originating from matrix and growth factor receptors have been found previously to be critical for the occurrence of a variety of cellular events such as cell proliferation and cell migration (e.g., see 51, 70, 86).In an attempt to determine how, at the molecular level,
N-cadherin activity is restored in neural crest cells, we
searched for possible changes in the phosphorylation level
of N-cadherin molecules during aggregation, and we found
that β- and γ-catenins, as well as a 180-kD protein, became
heavily phosphorylated most likely on serine-threonine
residues in aggregated cells. This situation is in striking
contrast with the one found in transformed cells. In these
cells, inactivation of cadherin molecules was found to be
accompanied by elevated tyrosine phosphorylation of
catenins (5, 35, 49, 65, 92, 108, 109), whereas, in neural
crest cells, activation correlates with increased serine/threonine phosphorylation of the same set of molecules. Thus,
β- and γ-catenins would possibly exist under three different forms differing in their level of phosphorylation: an
“active” form phosphorylated essentially on serine and
threonine residues, which is incorporated into stable associations with the actin cytoskeleton, and two “inactive”
forms that are not found in stable contacts and that are either hypophosphorylated or hyperphosphorylated on tyrosine residues. Moreover, this would suggest that the intimate mechanisms of regulation of cadherin activity, and
more broadly of cell adhesion, might be fundamentally different in normal, embryonic cells and in transformed cells,
and that abnormal tyrosine phosphorylation of surface
proteins causing their inactivation may be specific for virally infected cells. On the other hand, the nature of the
180-kD protein associated with N-cadherin has not been
determined yet, but a protein exhibiting a similar molecular mass and identified as the EGF receptor has been described in immune precipitates of MDCK cells and humanA431carcinoma cells using antibodies to E-cadherin and
to catenins (e.g., see 41, 45). In this event, our observation
would raise the intriguing possibility that changes in the
activity of integrins would affect the level of phosphorylation and eventually the activity of the EGF receptor in
neural crest cells.The absence of phosphorylation of catenins in migrating
neural crest cells is likely to result from the activity of the
Ca2+-dependent serine-threonine phosphatase calcineurin activated by integrin-mediated Ca2+ influxes. Most interestingly, calcineurin has also been found to be implicated in the regulation of cell-to-substratum adhesion in
CHO cells and in migrating neutrophils (for reviews see
39, 80, 91). In CHO cells, inhibition of calcineurin activity
was found to abolish interaction between the α5β1 integrin and fibronectin in an in vitro assay (80). In motile
neutrophils, in contrast, inhibition of Ca2+ entry or of calcineurin activity was found to reduce cell motility merely
because it prevented cell detachment from the substratum
and not cell attachment or spreading (39). Thus, in these
cells, calcineurin inhibition provokes accumulation of the
αvβ3 integrin to the ventral surface of the cell at the trailing edge, suggesting that its function would consist chiefly
in down-regulating binding of αvβ3 integrin to the substratum (55). In this context, the αvβ3 integrin can be regarded in motile cells, such as neural crest cells and neutrophils, as a key regulatory element that would be at the
origin of a cascade of signals involving Ca2+ fluxes and
that would control both cell release from the substratum
and prevention of intercellular contacts, two critical events
necessary for active cell locomotion. In contrast with αvβ3,
the precise role of the α4β1 integrin in the control of cadherin remains unclear. So far, Ca2+ influxes have never
been described after engagement of α4β1. Nevertheless,
ionomycin could abolish almost entirely the aggregation
effect of the antibodies to α4β1. It should be stressed that
aggregation produced by antibodies to α4β1 was significantly delayed as compared with that obtained with antibodies to αvβ3. Thus, α4β1 may not be directly involved in
the regulation of cadherin activity but possibly may be important for other cellular processes necessary for cell locomotion, which in turn would affect αvβ3.The existence of interplay between members of the different families of adhesion molecules has been suggested
previously in other cellular systems. For example, in a
strikingly similar fashion to neural crest cells, compaction
of mesodermal cells in somites has been found to be promoted by soluble RGD peptides (54) and to be mediated
by cadherins (Yamada, K.M., personal communication).
Likewise, it has been shown recently that, in endothelial
cells, β1 integrin engagement can signal to dephosphorylate PECAM-1, a member of the Ig domain superfamily,
and that this signaling pathway is important for PECAM-1–mediated control of cell migration (60). Conversely, the
loss of integrins that normally occurs in the epidermis during terminal differentiation of basal keratinocytes can be
prevented by antibodies to E- and P-cadherin (43). Stable
transfection of Xenopus XTC cells with E- or XB-cadherin
was shown to cause drastic deterioration of substratum adhesion to fibronectin and laminin and to induce reduction
of the surface amount and expression of both fibronectin
and α3β1 integrin (29). Lastly, in phagocytic cells, ligation
of αvβ3 with vitronectin was found specifically to inhibit
the phagocytosis of fibronectin beads, a process mediated
by the α5β1 integrin (6). In addition, the effect of αvβ3 on
α5β1 requires a signal transduction pathway involving a
serine-threonine kinase as well as integrin-associated protein (6, 7). Cross talk between adhesion molecules may
therefore be a general mechanism that would operate
throughout development as well as in the adult to ensure
both rapid and flexible changes and efficient coordination
between adhesion systems during cell motility, cell differentiation, wound repair, and host defense.
Authors: R Pulido; M J Elices; M R Campanero; L Osborn; S Schiffer; A García-Pardo; R Lobb; M E Hemler; F Sánchez-Madrid Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1991-06-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Mark S Filla; Marie K Schwinn; Amanda K Nosie; Ross W Clark; Donna M Peters Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Viktor Todorović; Bhushan V Desai; Melanie J Schroeder Patterson; Evangeline V Amargo; Adi D Dubash; Taofei Yin; Jonathan C R Jones; Kathleen J Green Journal: J Cell Sci Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 5.285