Literature DB >> 9197355

Impact of acute rejection and early allograft function on renal allograft survival.

F G Cosio1, R P Pelletier, M E Falkenhain, M L Henry, E A Elkhammas, E A Davies, G L Bumgardner, R M Ferguson.   

Abstract

Both acute rejection and the function of a renal allograft early after transplantation correlate with long-term graft survival. In this study we assessed the relationship between these two factors in 843 adult recipients of first cadaveric renal grafts, transplanted at a single institution and followed for a minimum of 3.5 years. Patients were divided into four groups according to (1) history of acute rejection (AR) during the first 6 months after transplantation, and (2) concentration of serum creatinine at 6 months after transplantation (SCr(6mo) < or > or = 2 mg/dl). Death censored allograft survival was not significantly different among patients without AR and with low SCr(6mo) (group 1, n=376), patients without AR but with an elevated SCr(6mo) (group 2, n=117), and patients with AR but low SCr(6mo) (group 3, n=185). In contrast, graft survival was significantly worse in patients with AR and an elevated SCr(6mo) (group 4, n=165) compared with patients in the other three groups (Cox, P<0.0001). The elevated SCr(6mo) in group 4 patients was not necessarily the consequence of AR, as 32% of patients in group 4 had a SCr at 10 days after transplantation (SCr(10d)), before they had AR, that was equal to or higher than the SCr(6mo). Based on this observation we investigated the implications of the SCr(10d) concentration for graft prognosis. The SCr(10d) correlated weakly with graft survival (Cox, P=0.05). However, an elevated SCr(10d) correlated with other potential risk factors for graft survival including: Older donors (P<0.0001), male recipients (P<0.0001), and heavier recipients (P<0.0001, all by multivariate regression); and posttransplant factors such as, increasing numbers of AR (P<0.0001), higher posttransplant blood pressure (P<0.0001), and lower doses of cyclosporine (P<0.0001, all by multivariate regression). In conclusion, graft dysfunction predicts poor graft survival only when associated with AR. Similarly, AR predicts a poor renal allograft survival only when associated with graft dysfunction. The SCr(10d) is an indicator of risk factors from both the donor and recipient, and an elevated SCr(10d) predicts a higher risk of acquiring additional risk factors early after transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9197355     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199706150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of kidney organ quality and prediction of outcome at time of transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas F Mueller; Kim Solez; Valeria Mas
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.623

2.  Donor P-gp polymorphisms strongly influence renal function and graft loss in a cohort of renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine therapy in a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J-B Woillard; J-P Rerolle; N Picard; A Rousseau; A Guillaudeau; E Munteanu; M Essig; M Drouet; Y Le Meur; P Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Long-term follow-up of the DeKAF cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Ann Fieberg; Roslyn B Mannon; Robert Leduc; Joe Grande; Bertram L Kasiske; Michael Cecka; Robert Gaston; Lawrence Hunsicker; John Connett; Fernando Cosio; Sita Gourishankar; David Rush
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Quantitative evaluation of acute renal transplant dysfunction with low-dose three-dimensional MR renography.

Authors:  Akira Yamamoto; Jeff L Zhang; Henry Rusinek; Hersh Chandarana; Pierre-Hugues Vivier; James S Babb; Thomas Diflo; Devon G John; Judith A Benstein; Laura Barisoni; David R Stoffel; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Raman spectroscopic differentiation of activated versus non-activated T lymphocytes: an in vitro study of an acute allograft rejection model.

Authors:  Kristian L Brown; Olena Y Palyvoda; Jagdish S Thakur; Sandra L Nehlsen-Cannarella; Omar R Fagoaga; Scott A Gruber; Gregory W Auner
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  The pathogenesis and treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Authors:  Can Li; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Steroid-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: rationale for and [corrected] outcomes following conversion to steroid based therapy.

Authors:  Scott Sutherland; Li Li; Waldo Concepcion; Oscar Salvatierra; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Induction therapy in renal transplant recipients: how convincing is the current evidence?

Authors:  Steven J Wagner; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 9.  The Interplay between inflammation and fibrosis in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Irina B Torres; Francesc Moreso; Eduard Sarró; Anna Meseguer; Daniel Serón
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.