Literature DB >> 9197292

Assessment of low-flow sevoflurane and isoflurane effects on renal function using sensitive markers of tubular toxicity.

E D Kharasch1, E J Frink, R Zager, T A Bowdle, A Artru, W M Nogami.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carbon dioxide absorbents degrade sevoflurane, particularly at low gas flow rates, to fluoromethyl-2,2-difluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl)vinyl ether (compound A). Compound A causes renal proximal tubular injury in rats but has had no effect on blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or creatinine concentrations in patients. This investigation compared the effects of low-flow sevoflurane and isoflurane on renal tubular function in surgical patients using conventional (BUN and creatinine) and finer indices of renal injury, specifically those biomarkers sensitive for compound A toxicity in rats (glucosuria, proteinuria, and enzymuria [N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and alpha-glutathione-S-transferase (alpha GST)]).
METHODS: Consenting patients with normal preoperative renal function at two institutions were randomized to receive sevoflurane (n = 36) or isoflurane (n = 37) in oxygen and air. Total gas flow was 1 l/min, opioid doses were minimized, and barium hydroxide lime was used to maximize anesthetic degradation. Inspiratory and expiratory compound A concentrations were quantified every 30-60 min. Blood and urine were obtained before and 24-72 h after anesthesia for laboratory evaluation.
RESULTS: Sevoflurane and isoflurane groups were similar with respect to age, weight, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, anesthetic duration (3.7 or 3.9 h), and anesthetic exposure (3.6 or 3 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]-hour). Maximum inspired compound A concentration (mean +/- standard deviation) was 27 +/- 13 ppm (range, 10-67 ppm). Areas under the inspired and expired compound A concentration versus time curves (AUC) were 79 +/- 54-ppm-h (range, 10-223 ppm-h) and 53 +/- 40 ppm-h (range, 6-159 ppm-h), respectively. There was no significant difference between anesthetic groups in postoperative serum creatinine or BUN, or urinary excretion of protein, glucose, NAG, proximal tubular alpha GST, or distal tubular pi GST. There was no significant correlation between compound A exposure (AUC) and protein, glucose, NAG, alpha GST, or pi GST excretion. Postoperative alanine and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations were not different between the anesthetic groups, and there were no significant correlations between compound A exposure and alanine or aspartate aminotransferase concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The renal tubular and hepatic effects of low-flow sevoflurane and isoflurane were similar as assessed using both conventional measures of hepatic and renal function and more sensitive biochemical markers of renal tubular cell necrosis. Moderate duration low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, during which compound A formation occurs, appears to be as safe as low-flow isoflurane anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9197292     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199706000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sevoflurane in paediatric anaesthesia: a review.

Authors:  K L Goa; S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  MCP-1 gene activation marks acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Raj Munshi; Ali Johnson; Edward D Siew; T Alp Ikizler; Lorraine B Ware; Mark M Wurfel; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Richard A Zager
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Sevoflurance: approaching the ideal inhalational anesthetic. a pharmacologic, pharmacoeconomic, and clinical review.

Authors:  L Delgado-Herrera; R D Ostroff; S A Rogers
Journal:  CNS Drug Rev       Date:  2001

4.  Renal cortical albumin gene induction and urinary albumin excretion in response to acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Lorraine B Ware; Ali C M Johnson; Richard A Zager
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2010-12-08

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane.

Authors:  M Behne; H J Wilke; S Harder
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Hemodynamic parameters of low-flow isoflurane and low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia during controlled ventilation with laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  Sohrab Negargar; Ali Peirovifar; Ata Mahmoodpoor; Masoud Parish; Samad Ej Golzari; Haniye Molseqi; Soheil Negargar
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-12-04

7.  Comparison of hepatic and renal function between inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Ji Wook Kim; Joo Duck Kim; Soo Bong Yu; Sie Jeong Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-02-15

Review 8.  The impact of sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Rakesh V Sondekoppam; Karim H Narsingani; Trent A Schimmel; Brie M McConnell; Karen Buro; Timur J-P Özelsel
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.713

9.  Case report: proximal tubule impairment following volatile anesthetic exposure.

Authors:  Evan C Ray; Khaled Abdel-Kader; Nicholas Bircher; Helbert Rondon-Berrios
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-09

10.  Comparative effect of propofol versus sevoflurane on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  A S Ammar; K M Mahmoud
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.