Literature DB >> 9196769

Side effects of mefloquine prophylaxis for malaria: an independent randomized controlled trial.

A M Croft1, T C Clayton, M J World.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized double-'blind' trial was undertaken during a military exercise in East Africa to determine whether there was a significant difference in the incidence of side effects experienced by soldiers taking mefloquine 250 mg weekly compared with those taking chloroquine 300 mg weekly and proguanil 200 mg daily as chemoprophylaxis for malaria. Subject to their informed voluntary consent, male soldiers who were not aviators were included in the study. Identical questionnaires were completed voluntarily at the end of 2 and 8 weeks. Symptoms were classified by nature into-'all', 'neuropsychological', 'enteric' and 'other', and by severity into 'severe' and 'very severe'. The proportions of respondents experiencing side effects were compared to seek statistically significant differences between the chemoprophylactic groups. Questionnaire 1 was completed after 2 weeks by 183 of 317 subjects (58%) randomly assigned mefloquine and by 176 of 307 subjects (57%) randomly assigned chloroquine-proguanil. The incidence of putative side effects was not significantly different between the groups (71/183 vs. 70/176), odds ratio 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 1.47). Questionnaire 2 was completed after 8 weeks by 145 of 317 subjects (46%) randomly assigned mefloquine and by 142 of 307 subjects (46%) randomly assigned chloroquine-proguanil. The incidence of putative side effects was still not significantly different between the groups (95/145 vs. 103/142), odds ratio 0.72 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.19). None of the subjects developed a serious neuropsychological reaction. Among respondents, 12.8% and 38% admitted lack of full compliance at 2 and 8 weeks, respectively. Exclusion of these subjects during a secondary analysis did not affect the results. None of the subjects developed malaria in the 12 months following return to the UK. Subject to the limitations of a response rate that was smaller than desired and the fact that the study was conducted in fit male military personnel, these results support evidence which indicates that mefloquine is no more toxic than chloroquine-proguanil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196769     DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(97)90223-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0035-9203            Impact factor:   2.184


  10 in total

1.  Randomized, double-blind study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tafenoquine versus mefloquine for malaria prophylaxis in nonimmune subjects.

Authors:  Peter E Nasveld; Michael D Edstein; Mark Reid; Leonard Brennan; Ivor E Harris; Scott J Kitchener; Peter A Leggat; Philip Pickford; Caron Kerr; Colin Ohrt; William Prescott
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Mefloquine is active in vitro and in vivo against Mycobacterium avium complex.

Authors:  L E Bermudez; P Kolonoski; M Wu; P A Aralar; C B Inderlied; L S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Modern malaria chemoprophylaxis.

Authors:  G Dennis Shanks; Michael D Edstein
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Compliance with Primary Malaria Chemoprophylaxis: Is Weekly Prophylaxis Better Than Daily Prophylaxis?

Authors:  Chaturaka Rodrigo; Senaka Rajapakse; Sumadhya Deepika Fernando
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  SRI-286, a thiosemicarbazole, in combination with mefloquine and moxifloxacin for treatment of murine Mycobacterium avium complex disease.

Authors:  Luiz E Bermudez; Peter Kolonoski; Lianne E Seitz; Mary Petrofsky; Robert Reynolds; Martin Wu; Lowell S Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Malaria at Christmas: risks of prophylaxis versus risks of malaria.

Authors:  A J Reid; C J Whitty; H M Ayles; R M Jennings; B A Bovill; J M Felton; R H Behrens; A D Bryceson; D C Mabey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28

Review 7.  WITHDRAWN: Mefloquine for preventing malaria in non-immune adult travellers.

Authors:  A M J Croft; P Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 8.  Mefloquine for preventing malaria during travel to endemic areas.

Authors:  Maya Tickell-Painter; Nicola Maayan; Rachel Saunders; Cheryl Pace; David Sinclair
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-30

9.  Sporozoite immunization of human volunteers under mefloquine prophylaxis is safe, immunogenic and protective: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Else M Bijker; Remko Schats; Joshua M Obiero; Marije C Behet; Geert-Jan van Gemert; Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer; Wouter Graumans; Lisette van Lieshout; Guido J H Bastiaens; Karina Teelen; Cornelus C Hermsen; Anja Scholzen; Leo G Visser; Robert W Sauerwein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Malaria Prevention, Mefloquine Neurotoxicity, Neuropsychiatric Illness, and Risk-Benefit Analysis in the Australian Defence Force.

Authors:  Stuart McCarthy
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-12-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.