Literature DB >> 9196620

Reamed against unreamed nailing of the femoral diaphysis: a retrospective study of healing time.

P V Giannoudis1, A J Furlong, D A Macdonald, R M Smith.   

Abstract

In order to assess the results of the AO unreamed femoral nail (URFN), and specifically its effects on healing, 147 consecutive patients treated were reviewed. These included 50 reamed femoral nails (RFN) and 97 unreamed femoral nails. Exclusion of pathological fractures, revisions and fractures outside the femoral diaphysis left 51 procedures in which the healing process could be studied. Twenty-four unreamed and 27 reamed femoral nails in patients with diaphyseal fractures AO (32) were followed up by clinical review and radiographically until union or death. There were two deaths from multiple injuries (one in each group) and two non-unions (at 52 weeks), one in each group. There were no cases of infection, angular deformity of leg length discrepancy; two cases required early rotational correction. There was a single broken distal locking screw in the URFN group but no other implant failures. The fractures in the URFN cases took longer to heal with a mean of 26.9 weeks as opposed to 20.5 weeks in the RFN group (P = 0.009). This did not cause a significant clinical problem. The URFN proved easy to use with a much shorter operation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196620     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(96)00146-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  [Reaming debris: a source of vital cells! First results of human specimens].

Authors:  K Trinkaus; S Wenisch; C Siemers; D Hose; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The effectiveness of the antegrade reamed technique: the experience and complications from 415 traumatic femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Efthimios J Karadimas; George Papadimitriou; Gerasimos Theodoratos; Anastasios Papanikolaou; John Maris
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-11-21

3.  Clinical outcome of ream versus unream intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Farshid Bagheri; Seyed Reza Sharifi; Navid Reza Mirzadeh; Alireza Hootkani; Mohamad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Hami Ashraf
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

4.  Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; Hai-Ming Jin; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  ANTEGRADE X RETROGRADE NAILING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES: A STUDY ON CONSOLIDATION AND INFECTION.

Authors:  Jorge Rafael Durigan; Ana Carolina da Silva; Pedro Takata; Caio Zamboni; Claudio Santili; Marcelo Tomanik Mercadante
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.